• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance in contemporary society

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance in contemporary society Marxist criminologists argue that the state passes laws which support ruling-class interests, and maintain its control and power over the subject class. They put forward the view that laws do not reflect value consensus, but instead reflect the values of ruling class ideology. Therefore, laws work towards false class consciousness, as laws only benefit the ruling minority. Many Marxists also argue that there are a vast number of laws protecting property, and Snider (1993) argued the state is often reluctant to pass laws which might threaten profitability. She also argued capitalist states often pour large amounts of money into attracting business; for example offering new investors tax concessions and grants. The state may also be reluctant to pass or enforce laws against pollution and worker health and safety, as it may affect profit. Lauren Snider further argued that 'many of the most serious anti-social and predatory acts committed in modern industrial countries are corporate crimes'. ...read more.

Middle

He said crime should not be attempted to be eliminated completely, as society needs it in order to maintain acceptable limits. Marxist arguments also place an endue amount of emphasis on corporate crime, as Left realists argue. Crimes such as burglary and other violent crimes cause much greater harm than Marxists imply. Victims of crime are completely ignored in the Marxist analysis of crime; the harm done by offenders is not taken into account, and as victims are often drawn from less well-off sections of society, the consequences of these crimes can perhaps be more devastating than if a person from higher social strata was targeted. Marxists offer a very one sided view of crime, as the focus on corporate crime is based largely on economics, and ignores the social side of crime. Marxist criminology offers no view on the types of crimes which are of most concern to the majority of the population. The 'full social theory of deviance', put forward by Taylor, Walton and Young argues that rather than just focussing on structural reasons; individual motivation should also be considered. ...read more.

Conclusion

Labelling theorists interpret deviance as a process of interaction between deviants and non-deviants. For example minor acts of childhood deviance may be regarded as harmless in an affluent area, but in less affluent areas they might be seen as evidence of tendencies towards teenage anti-social behaviour. Once a child is labelled a delinquent, they may consequently be considered untrustworthy by teachers and prospective employers. Howard Becker argued 'deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label.' He also said that a person's dress, manner of speech or ethnicity could be the key factors that determine whether or not the deviant label is applied. The Marxist perspective on crime is useful to the extent of determining crime in economic terms. However, it places undue emphasis on corporate crime. It also argues that the state passes laws only to benefit the ruling classes, however, this theory neglects the fact that the majority of laws are made to protect the lives of the whole population. Crime covers a huge variety of forms of activity-from minor crimes such as petty theft, to mass murder. Due to this, it is difficult to produce a single theory that would account for all forms of crime. ?? ?? ?? ?? Emily Kaill ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Liberal & Radical Feminism These early feminist explanations largely accept the statistics and believe that females are less criminally inclined than males. They stress that women are more likely to be victims of domestic violence and sexual assaults than men.

  2. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    They may then start believing that everyone else was right. They really are suffering from a mental illness and will accept their label. Interactionists also challenged the functionalist's view that deviants formed a specific group of the population. They concentrate instead on the interactions involved in branding someone as a

  1. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    This explanation of criminal deviance is useful and, alongside Hobbs' work, shows that for some people crime can be a career choice. But the approach is not completely correct, it shares similar weaknesses to Merton's Strain Theory. One criticism which is shared with Merton, is the categorisation of individuals; there

  2. Assess the usefulness of consensus theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in ...

    However Durkheim believed that the purpose of the punishment was not making the wrongdoer mend his ways but the reaffirm shared norms reinforcing social solidarity. An example of this would be a court report in the local newspaper. In contemporary society this should be a way of warning other offenders

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    However, drug companies put pressure on the government not to enforce this law so capitalists owned factories could continue to manufacture amphetamine and continue their profits. This shows that capitalists are exempt from the law. Another example is given by Carson who took a sample from 200 firms, all of which had broken health and safety laws at least once.

  2. Outline & Evaluate the Marxist view of crime (45 Marks)

    The home office statistics probably underestimate the extent of middle and upper class crime more than they underestimate crime from a general perspective. Left realists argue that the damage created by working class crimes should not be ignored, violent street crime is far from what is seen as normal in our society and is still a growing problem.

  1. Outline and assess Marxist explanations of crime and deviance.

    The laws created by the bourgeoisie (middle class) were created to protect property owned by the bourgeoisie. However when the wealthy are caught in deviant behaviour it is much more accepted even excused they are rarely branded criminals. In the opinion of the Marxists the difference between illegal and deviant

  2. Critically evaluate Marxists contributions to the study of crime and deviance.

    (It is interesting to note that with age, Young has become less radical) Working class people are the victims of a great deal of working class crime and Young now recognises that the social controls provided by the state can protect working class people from crime and criminals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work