• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance in contemporary society

Extracts from this document...


Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance in contemporary society Marxist criminologists argue that the state passes laws which support ruling-class interests, and maintain its control and power over the subject class. They put forward the view that laws do not reflect value consensus, but instead reflect the values of ruling class ideology. Therefore, laws work towards false class consciousness, as laws only benefit the ruling minority. Many Marxists also argue that there are a vast number of laws protecting property, and Snider (1993) argued the state is often reluctant to pass laws which might threaten profitability. She also argued capitalist states often pour large amounts of money into attracting business; for example offering new investors tax concessions and grants. The state may also be reluctant to pass or enforce laws against pollution and worker health and safety, as it may affect profit. Lauren Snider further argued that 'many of the most serious anti-social and predatory acts committed in modern industrial countries are corporate crimes'. ...read more.


He said crime should not be attempted to be eliminated completely, as society needs it in order to maintain acceptable limits. Marxist arguments also place an endue amount of emphasis on corporate crime, as Left realists argue. Crimes such as burglary and other violent crimes cause much greater harm than Marxists imply. Victims of crime are completely ignored in the Marxist analysis of crime; the harm done by offenders is not taken into account, and as victims are often drawn from less well-off sections of society, the consequences of these crimes can perhaps be more devastating than if a person from higher social strata was targeted. Marxists offer a very one sided view of crime, as the focus on corporate crime is based largely on economics, and ignores the social side of crime. Marxist criminology offers no view on the types of crimes which are of most concern to the majority of the population. The 'full social theory of deviance', put forward by Taylor, Walton and Young argues that rather than just focussing on structural reasons; individual motivation should also be considered. ...read more.


Labelling theorists interpret deviance as a process of interaction between deviants and non-deviants. For example minor acts of childhood deviance may be regarded as harmless in an affluent area, but in less affluent areas they might be seen as evidence of tendencies towards teenage anti-social behaviour. Once a child is labelled a delinquent, they may consequently be considered untrustworthy by teachers and prospective employers. Howard Becker argued 'deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label.' He also said that a person's dress, manner of speech or ethnicity could be the key factors that determine whether or not the deviant label is applied. The Marxist perspective on crime is useful to the extent of determining crime in economic terms. However, it places undue emphasis on corporate crime. It also argues that the state passes laws only to benefit the ruling classes, however, this theory neglects the fact that the majority of laws are made to protect the lives of the whole population. Crime covers a huge variety of forms of activity-from minor crimes such as petty theft, to mass murder. Due to this, it is difficult to produce a single theory that would account for all forms of crime. ?? ?? ?? ?? Emily Kaill ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    He discovered that the police etc. had to make a series of decisions which were based on a personal set of meanings held by the participants. First of all the police have to decide where to patrol, Cicourel found that they tended to go to inner city, low income areas

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Liberal & Radical Feminism These early feminist explanations largely accept the statistics and believe that females are less criminally inclined than males. They stress that women are more likely to be victims of domestic violence and sexual assaults than men.

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    Thus the norms and values of mainstream society are rejected and attainable norms and values are produced which redefine the goals. The result is the delinquent subculture, which as Cohen stated "takes its norms from the larger society but turns them upside down".

  2. Marxism is a structural theory, as people's actions are shaped by society and in ...

    While David Gordon argues that crime is rational, it makes sense. In a 'dog eat dog' society where competition is the order of the day, individuals must fend for themselves in order to survive. In evaluation , Marxists have been criticised for assuming that a communist system could solve crime.

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    Slavery benefits capitalists as then they do not have to pay them and so maximise their profits. In modernity, after the invention of machinery, slavery was no longer needed as machines are faster, do not require sleep or feeding and make more money.

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    are many people who may be sat on the border of two categories, and also, it is difficult to except the three categories, as there is no reference to people who break free from this subculture. Furthermore, many argue that both theories fail to recognise female deviance, as this often

  1. Outline and assess Marxist explanations of crime and deviance.

    However if a factory worker died as a result of exposure to dangerous chemicals the worst sentence to be expected would be a heavy fine even if the management were aware of the risk beforehand. Functionalist and New Right movement accept the non-sociologist definition of crime and deviance.

  2. Assess the usefulness of consensus theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in ...

    However Durkheim believed that the purpose of the punishment was not making the wrongdoer mend his ways but the reaffirm shared norms reinforcing social solidarity. An example of this would be a court report in the local newspaper. In contemporary society this should be a way of warning other offenders

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work