• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criminology can be considered a hybrid of various other sciences.

Extracts from this document...


Criminology can be considered a hybrid of various other sciences. It has been influenced by numerous disciplines including: - sociology (social influences), psychology (personality, moral development etc), psychiatry (mental illness and crime), biology (genetic influences etc), law (legal aspects) and statistics (the measurement of crime). See Appendix A for a time line of criminal theories. There are many perspectives from which crime can be defined, just as there are many opinions about why people commit crimes. Society often defines crime from a strictly legal point of view, as the commission of any act prohibited by criminal law, or the omission of any action required by it - with a criminal defined as any person who commits a crime. But crime can also be defined by referring to some moral or religious code, or by formulating a definition based upon an intellectual or cultural frame of reference for human behaviour (such as biology, medicine, psychiatry, and sociology). What constitutes crime varies from culture to culture and time period to time period - what was considered 'criminal' a few centuries ago (or even a few decades ago) e.g. homosexuality is not now considered criminal in our culture (in other cultures it is still considered a crime). On the other hand what once was not illegal e.g. marital rape and slavery, are now considered criminal acts. In some cultures abortion is still illegal, whilst in this country it is not. ...read more.


These studies help in identifying trends in crime and are useful in aiding risk assessment and/or management strategies. Crime surveys are also useful in recording the publics attitudes towards the police. However, these surveys are expensive, not totally accurate and can be biased in the sampling. These surveys do not provide us with a clear picture of the 'real' crime rate. There are problems such as selective memory - events may be forgotten, may be made to seem less or more important, according to the social position and post-event biography of the witness. Embarrassment or modesty - victims of rape remain less likely to report - indeed, some women who have reported rapes to the police do not do so to victimisation surveys. This is particularly true when the assailant is related to the victim. Unconcern or lack of knowledge - people tend not to report such acts as vandalism or when reporting the crime isn't financially rewarding (e.g. when the excess on an insurance policy is higher than the value of the goods stolen). Also these surveys cannot discover those candidate acts that are perceived by no one. These studies, then, suggest that a great deal of unpleasant behaviour is never reported to the police, but they still cannot be said to give us a clear and accurate picture of such behaviour in itself. The self-report study is an attempt to discover what kinds of people commit offences - in this case, a sample - ...read more.


For the countries covered in this report, interviews were mainly conducted by telephone (with samples selected through variants of random digit dialling). The overall response rate in the 17 countries was 64%. Samples were usually of 2,000 people, which mean there is a fairly wide sampling error on the ICVS estimates. The surveys cannot, then, give precise estimates of crime in different countries. But they are a unique source of information and give good comparative information. Among the further advantages of the survey are the diverse uses of its data. The desegregated data can be presented in many more informative ways than simple national crime rates or age-specific rates included in most surveys. Most statistical series have not so directly addressed questions of the contextual factors of crime incidence. Secondary analysis of the data could shed light on the effects of socio-economic changes on victimisation rates, repercussions of victimisation, including fear, prevailing attitudes and official responses. It has also been suggested that more work should be done to refine the methodology so as to increase the accuracy and comparability of the victimisation rate estimates across countries, and bases for finding predictor variables on models of crime and justice policies cross-nationally. Another approach would be to pool cases across countries with important common characteristics, and developing nation-types. Other elements of multilevel analyses might be prediction of the extent of crime-related loss, role of insurance in recovery, public demand for punishment, persistence of fear and factors involved in the decision to call the police. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    This began the positive school of thinking. This was debated through the years in the professions of biology, psychology and sociology. Each science had its own specialists who in turn had their own interpretation of the etiology of criminality. The main emphasis of most of the theories was that behaviour was determined by traits associated by each discipline.

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    label offenders ordinary people who commit ordinary crimes. Criminals are not abnormal; it is their rational decision to commit crime. Criminals are responding to the criminogenic situations they find themselves in. Compared to radical criminologists, radical criminologists propose the situation of society forces society into committing crime. "Criminological theories have been little concerned with the situational determinants of crime.

  1. How does positive criminology differ from classical criminology in its approach to understanding criminology ...

    They think that this is human nature. They believed that each one of us is a potential criminal, and that crime provides a short cut way to getting what we need. Responsibility- the classical school believed that if we do something wrong or do something at the expence of someone

  2. Literature Review: The Impact of Heroin Prices on Robbery Trends

    (2001), The Federation Press, Sydney, at 1076-1081. 5 Maher, L. Dixon, D. Lynskey, M. and Hall, (n 4) at 1076-1081. 6 Chilvers, M. and Weatherburn, D. (n 1) 7 Mukherjee, S. and Jorgensen, L. Burglary: A Social Reality, (1986) Proceedings of Seminary on Burglary, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.

  1. How far does Becker's account (The Outsiders 1963) of the processes underlying the selective ...

    - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution" In R v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ex parte Blackburn (1968) - Lord Denning said: "Although the chief officers of police are answerable to the law, there are many fields in which they have discretion..."

  2. Critical Criminology, as a specific theoretical approach to explaining, understanding and controlling crime is ...

    (Tierney, 287) They are interested in how particular crimes are not inherently "wrong" or "bad" and at how some crimes, which are deemed atrocious and worthy of great disciplinary action, are focused on through mechanisms of popular discourse while other (just as serious)

  1. The Classical School of Criminology

    In this sense, punishment can be seen as preventative. But in order to be effective, the deterrence must possess celerity (swiftness), severity, and certainty (Beccaria, 1764, p.282-284). If a punishment is quick to follow the crime, people are more likely to recall the connection when contemplating a criminal act, and weigh it into their consideration-this is celerity.

  2. In what way can the state be accused of taking part in criminal activity?

    The State socialise the people who will be committing the crime; so to an extent they are brain washing them into doing the crime but the State is not convicted for it. So the people being ?brainwashed? are just pawns used by the State and ensure that the crime

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work