• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Diversity in Modern Family Life

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Diversity in Modern Family Life. Holly Anderson. "Explain and discuss how modern family life is catagorised by diversity." George Peter Murdock (1949) believed that the nuclear family should perform 'vital functions,' namely sexual, economic, reproductive and educational. He argues that 'No society has succeeded in finding an adequate substitute for the nuclear family, to which it might transfer there functions. It is highly doubtful whether any society will ever succeed in such an attempt.' [1.] Functionalists such as Murdock are inclined to ignore any diversity in family life in industrial society. There are few mentions of lone-parent families, cohabiting families and reconstituted families, or a variety of family lifestyles based on class, ethnicity, religion and locality. Of course there are alternatives to these opinions. R.N. Rapoport and R. Rapoport (1982) are critical of the assumption that the nuclear family is the 'ideal' family type. They mention that in 1994 only 20% of nuclear families still named the father as the sole breadwinner and the mother as the home-maker. The Rapoports argue that family life is now charactarised by diversity and that there is now a wide range of family types, other than the nuclear, in British society. The Rapoports believe there are five main elements of family diversity in Great Britain. Organizational, Cultural, Social Class, Life-Cycle of the family and Cohort. David Eversley and Lucy Bonnerjea add a sixth variable, Region. ...read more.

Middle

Studies such as Geoffrey Driver (1982), Mary Chamberlain (1999) and Berthoud and Beishon (1997) [7], generate a picture that suggests that families of ethnic minorities in Britain have indeed adapted. But they have not fundamentally altered their traditions to those they are now familiar with in the UK. When this point is made, it is clear that ethnic minority groups have most certainly contributed to the diversity of family life in Britain, while retaining their cultural heritage at the same time. However, it has been pointed out that changes are taking place within the ethnic societies in Britain, namely the younger generations, who are becoming increasingly familiar with British culture that surrounds them, and less familiar with their parents'. Errol Lawrence (1982) agrees that different cultural and ethnic histories produce new and different family 'norms' [6.] Young and Willmott (1973) argue that working-class families are more likely to be extended and while urban renewal policies have led to many being split up, this type of family will generally try to remain as close as possible to each other. They also state that middle-class families are less likely to live close by, but they do keep in regular contact. The Rapoports claim that there may be more significant differences between middle-class and working-class families, that stem a little deeper. They claim that the relationship between husband and wife will differ, as well as the way the children are socialized and disciplined. ...read more.

Conclusion

[12.] Others, such as, Graham Allan and Graham Crow (2001) believe that not only were the Rapoports right about diversity contributing to change, but that it is a change that has only continued to grow. In fact, they believe the diversity to have become so great that they claim, 'in an important sense there is no such thing as "the family."' [13.] 'Families in Britain today are in a transition from coping in a society in which there was a single overriding norm of what family life should be like, to a society in which a plurality of norms are recognized as legitimate, indeed, desirable.' Rapoport and Rapoport (1982) [14.] [1.] OCR GCE Sociology pg 77 [2.] Sociology Review, September 2002, pg 12 [3.] www.independent.co.uk/news/uk (The Independent newspaper -Britain's Children.) [4.] Sociology Review, September 2002, pg 18 [5.] Haralambos and Holborn - Sociology Themes and Perspectives, pg 497 [6.] Suki Ali, Sociology review, sept 2002, pg 6 [7.] Haralambos and Holborn - Sociology Themes and Perspectives, pg 504 [8.] Janet Foster - Villains, 1990 [9.] Haralambos and Holborn - Sociology Themes and Perspectives, pg 505 [10.] Stephen Moore, Steve Chapman and Dave Aiken - AS-Level sociology, pg 53 [11.] Haralambos and Holborn - Sociology Themes and Perspectives, pg 506 [12.] Haralambos and Holborn - Sociology Themes and Perspectives, pg 506 [13.] Haralambos and Holborn - Sociology Themes and Perspectives, pg 495/496 [14.] Haralambos and Holborn - Sociology Themes and Perspectives, pg 506 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Discuss the view that the modern family is becoming more diverse

    It wasn't until 1979 that the Household Survey, the main source of data for British households, that actually gave an option of cohabiting. It has been recorded that the number of unmarried men and women living together has increased indefinitely and has risen around 400% in the past 40 years.

  2. Discuss the view that the modern family is becoming more diverse

    However, like functionalists, Marxists believe that the family reproduces and socialises children but for differing reasons. Eli Zaretsky (1976) claimed that the modern capitalist society created the illusion that the family is able to provide warmth and support, whereas in reality he felt that it was not equipped well enough to cope with the psychological and personal needs of individuals.

  1. Is the modern family breaking down or is it simply changing?

    Berthoud and Beishon said that South Asians were "most likely to marry and marry younger than their white equivalents. Few of them lived as married and separation and divorce were relatively rare." Almost all Asian women were married, and many with children lived in the same house as their husband's parents.

  2. How cultural deprivation affects the educational attainment of students.

    maybe at a disadvantage and how the education system benefits white students. Parental interest is also an important factor. Douglas found that parental interest is the most important factor that will affect educational progress. Parental interest may also be a deciding factor when encouraging their children to carry on into further education.

  1. Sociology Family Revision Notes

    1 greater gender equality ? challenged male domination expect equality in home and work 2 greater individualism ? actions are influenced by calculations of self-interest, rather that obligation to others Beck ? Gernshein 1995- these trends have led to the negotiated family- does not conform to the norm of patriarchal

  2. Is the nuclear family in decline?

    common, marriage rates have declined and a big rise in numbers of step families. Thus this view are partly in agreement to that of Murdock and Nicholson. Again the guy and lesbian households have become common. Jeffrey Weeks and Catherine Donovan (1999)

  1. Families and Households. Notes on Diversity Childhood and Industrialisation.

    the parent Families and Households ? Function of the Family Functionalist ? Argue the role of the family is to perform stabilisation and socialisation effectively. Feminists ? Feminists argue the role of the family is to oppress women New right ? Argue the main role of the family is to

  2. Sociology Research Paper - To examine how teenage pregnancy affects the teen mothers health ...

    25% were nervous because of their parents and 50% stated that they were traumatized Figure 4 Fig 4 shows the percentage on how would the teen mother maintain financial function of her family 67% of the respondents said they would depend on welfare, 5% said that they will get money

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work