• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the usefulness of Social Surveys as a research method.

Extracts from this document...


Examine the usefulness of Social Surveys as a research method. In this essay I will be looking at the usefulness of social surveys, in particular, Questionnaires and structured Interviews. Social surveys consist of quantitative methods that are preferred by positivists as they are conducted on a large scale and are therefore representative of the population. A large sample size denotes reliability which is also preferred by positivist sociologists. Social surveys are a useful type of research method as they are a good way of studying large numbers of people, therefore making it easy to generalise the population and they can be used to collect data and test hypotheses. An example of a very large scale survey in the UK is the Census. The Census is carried out every ten years and is given to the population to fill out and return. Social surveys consist of two forms: written questionnaires, which respondents are asked to complete; and interviews, that are either face to face or over the telephone. Questionnaires are the most commonly used form of social surveys. They are usually used for reaching large numbers of people and consist of two questions: open and closed questions. ...read more.


Another way to increase the response rate of questionnaires could be to offer incentives such as a pen but then again that would add to the cost of conducting the research as well. Interpretivists would not think that questionnaires are useful as they argue that data from questionnaires lack validity and do not give a true picture of what is studied. People may lie, misinterpret the questions, not know the answers to the question, exaggeration could occur or even the wrong person could fill in the questionnaire making the research to be far less reliable. This is what Schofield experienced when he conducted his research in 1985. One of his questions asked: "Are you a virgin?" and the response were 'no not yet', demonstrating how people could easily misinterpret a simple question. There is also the problem of time lags i.e. the time it takes for the respondent to receive, complete and send back the questionnaire. All these factors question the usefulness of questionnaires and consequently social surveys. The other types of social surveys most used are interviews. Interviews can be conducted face to face, over the internet or over the telephone. ...read more.


The problems of using structured interviews are that they can still have some interviewer bias/effect on the response from the interviewee and therefore an answer could be exaggerated or adapted to likings of the researcher. There are usually a limited range of alternative answers which affects the validity of the research and these limited responses can be limited, overlap or they can be open to interpretation as well. Different interviewers could mean that some variables aren't kept the same and therefore again could have an affect how the response of the responder. As a rapport is not built in structured interviews it means that it is harder to uncover sensitive information as the respondent may not feel comfortable to talk about something to a stranger. In conclusion social surveys usually consist of structured interviews and questionnaires both of which have similar usefulness's and even similar disadvantages. Positivists nevertheless love to use social surveys as they produce hard reliable, quantitative data and they can easily be conducted cheaply again to test the reliability of your first results. Interpretivists disagree with positivists and would say that social surveys are not useful at all as they do not produce valid data that can be used to produce an accurate picture of society. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. METHODOLGY The research design sets out how the researcher will collect evidence and ...

    Another problem with laboratory experiments are that if the subjects (participants) in an experiment know that it is being done they may not act as they usually do because they are in a controlled environment and are nervous about expressing their 'true self' to the researcher.

  2. Interview is a form of research method which involves interaction between interviewer and respondents ...

    In other words, group interview allows larger sample size to be studied in a shorter time than in individual interview. Hence, data collected in group interview will be more representative and generalizable. Furthermore, James Holstein and Jaber Gubrium argue that respondents in group interviews are more reflexive than in individual interviews due to multivocality.

  1. The Making of a Moonie

    Evaluation of Research Findings (350-400) 410 After going to a recruitment session and deciding to study the Moonies, Barker found there was no evidence that physical force or other means of affecting biological or physical make up was used on members. She argues that the fact that most people who are subjected to the Moonies

  2. Assess the usefulness of observations in sociological research

    true, the participants knew they were being observed and thus the observation is classed as overt. When Whyte began his research, he simply observed the gang. However, as time went by he became more involved and even moved away from his home into the area in which the gang lived.

  1. Assess the usefulness of Positivist Research

    Positivist research is also useful because it can highlights trends and patterns in regards to social behaviour or actions. For example, by comparing the rate of divorce with other scientifically measured factors, such as socioeconomic class and location, it is possible to spot correlations that can provide an insight into reasons and meanings.

  2. Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

    It is therefore difficult to claim that the findings can be generalised across the population as a whole. Most (participant) observational studies are concerned with the least powerful groups in society. Positivists would argue, what about the powerful and their activities?

  1. Discuss the usefulness of Quantative and Qualitative Methods in study of Suicide.

    Suicide is an extremely emotional experience for a family to go through and so to observe a family experiencing this and observe the situation is quite insensitive.

  2. Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society

    The goal is to control the image that they are presenting to others. When others get a glimpse behind the mask, backstage, this can disrupt the illusion and can often create conflict. The Dramaturgical Model doesn?t really suggest ways to bring change or reform to the actions of the performers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work