• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

New Right Realism & New Left Realism. The realist approach to crime treats crime as a real problem.

Extracts from this document...


New Right Realism & New Left Realism The realist approach to crime treats crime as a real problem. This involves finding practical solutions to help repair problems within the criminal justice system and to find solutions to why a certain crime is being committed in the first place, by looking at problematic sources in our society. Interactionists and Marxists would say that crime and deviance is socially constructed, whereas realists see crime as "real" and believe they are more concerned with solving the problem of crime than other critical theories. Both left and right realist approaches were developed as a result of a large increase in crime and public disorders in the 1980's to try and address the problem. Both approaches are critical of non realist approaches, for sympathising and romanticising the criminal, ignoring damage victims have faced and failing to produce practical solutions to crime. New left realism stems from Marxism and Interactionism; Agreeing with Marxism that society is exploitative and unequal. Despite this, it criticises both approaches to crime as they tend to sympathise with the criminals and ignores the damaged caused to the victims of crime. New left realists also accept that the official criminal statistics are biased yet they still argue that members of ethnic minority groups and working class youths are more likely to indulge in criminal activity because they have more reason to do so, such as youths who experience extreme levels of material deprivation. Left realists accuse Marxists of romanticising the criminal by portraying them as resistant of the capitalist system. ...read more.


An insight into relative deprivation can also explain white collar crime, as it can occur in all social classes. This shows that as a person becomes wealthier, it is likely they will become greedier, so they still want more expensive investments which they may not be able to afford. A solution that Kinsey, Lea and Young produced enabled them to make police aware of the fear of crime in certain geographic areas. They argue stop and search policies are largely ineffective as the officers rarely find anything and merely antagonise the public sphere as a whole, on which the police rely. They also suggest that the police should work with the young people to solve the criminal activity problems in their local areas. Priorities need to be made correctly in problematic areas. There needs to be more investment in these areas to improve the living standards of poorer families and to provide jobs for the unemployed. An improvement on leisure facilities would be ideal, to "keep kids off the streets" and making something of their teenage years rather than thieving or fighting. When coming to evaluative conclusions of the Left Realist approach, you will find that they offer practical solutions to the criminal activity problems within society. More than other theories do, they focus on the victims of crime to get more of an idea as to why the criminals are offending in the first place. Left Realists also put forward a theory of why poorer groups in society are likely to commit crime. ...read more.


Wilson and Kelling found that the neighbourhood effect intertwined with a reluctant amount of social control can also help reduce crime. They also found that vandalism attracts further vandalism; this is known as the broken windows effect. Another way to reduce crime would be for the public could report local nuisances and any forms of criminal activities. New Right theorists suggest that individuals will make a rational decision to commit crime if the opportunity is there and it is easy to commit crime. They will also consider if the potential benefits outweigh the potential costs. They therefore argue it should be made difficult to commit crime and the costs of committing crime should be higher. A big problem with this theory is that it fails to look at unequal opportunities and the causes of crime such as poverty. The theory is also based on assumptions that may not be accurate, such as lone parent families being a factor of crime. Jones states that factors such as a lack of investment are far more important in preventing decline in of an area than tolerance of a few broken windows. He also points out that the theory ignores the three strikes and out rule that the American law system uses. Interactionists would say that this theory ignores the notion of the typical offender, because it focuses on all races. Right realism has had a considerable amount of influence on policymaking in Britain, yet it has led out society to preoccupation with retribution and punishment, making a rise in prison population. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Tertiary deviance occurs when the deviant fully accepts the deviant role but rejects the stigma associated with it, as when lesbians and gays proudly display their identity. DEVIANT IDENTITY Another contribution of labelling theory is the understanding that deviance refers not jus to something one does, but also to something one becomes.

  2. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    Example of negligence where blame could not be placed is shown in the highly publicised sinking of the cross-channel ferry Herald of Free Enterprise in 1989. The tragic death toll of over 100 was investigated and found that the person responsible for closing the bow doors had fallen asleep, a

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    Cohen's explanation for the reasons crime and deviance occur offers a valid conclusion for the unequal nature of the social structure. However he does not explain why some delinquent subcultures eventually rejoin society and become law-abiding citizens whilst remaining in the same lower class stratification.

  2. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    Marginal groups often resort to riots and acts of violence as forms of political action. Left Realist criminologists pay certain attention to practical ways of tackling crime. Richard Kinsey, Young and Lea put forward a variety of suggestions about was of changing policing.

  1. Assess the value of the right realist approach to crime and deviance

    low intelligence, and low impulse control that could put them at greater risk of offending. Inadequate socialisation may also contribute to the risk of an individual offending, since it is supposed to teach self-control and internalise values of right and wrong.

  2. Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors ...

    control such as better housing, however there have too be more forceful measures into deterring criminals, such as the views of the right realists. They believe that it would be best for crime and deviance to be solved by formal social control such as harder prison sentences due to the

  1. REVISION - CRIME, PUNISHMENT AND PROTEST INTRODUCTION Crime, Punishment and Protest covers a period ...

    Once writing was invented, these laws could be written down. These dealt with a greater range of crimes, such as theft, damage to property, violence against people and family relationships. Many were also connected to religious beliefs. Although the number of laws tended to increase, many general aspects remained the

  2. Why do people commit crime?

    The offenders are often men with a lower socio-economic background and have committed other violent non-social acts. They may have previous convictions, alcohol dependency, and display macho, narcissistic attitudes towards women. Some academics have analysed the social-structural reasons for domestic violence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work