An Explanation Of Market Forces

Authors Avatar
An Explanation Of Market Forces

There have been a number of phrases, which define the term "economics", the most modern and widely used of which is as follows; "the science which studied human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses". Quoted by L. Robbins during the 1930's, it takes the bias of the neo-classical approach as opposed to one of a more typically classical economist. (A.G. Anderton, 1992: 289).

The subject of economics is too large to comprehend sometimes. I intend to merely skim the surface on various topics within the field of economics.

Talking About Fundamental Economic Problems

Just as in politics, the term "economic" tends to be used in a variety of ways and contexts in order to describe certain aspects of human behaviour, ranging from activities such as producing, distributing and consuming, to the idea of frugality in the use of a resource. Modern definitions stress how such behaviour, and the institutions in which it takes place (e.g. households, firms, governments, banks), are concerned with the satisfaction of human needs and wants through the transformation of resources into goods and services which are consumed by society. These processes are said to take place under conditions of "economic scarcity". (Worthington & Britton, 2000: 82).

The economist's idea of "scarcity" centres around the relationship between a society's needs and wants and the resources available to satisfy them. In essence, economists argue that whereas needs and wants tend to be unlimited, the resources, which can be used to meet those, needs and wants are finite. The assumption here is that both individual and collective needs and wants consistently outstrip the means available to satisfy them, as exemplified, for instance, by the inability of governments to provide instant health care, the best roads, education, defence, railways, and so on. This being the case, "choices" have to be made by both individuals and society concerning priorities concerning resources, and every choice inevitably involves a "sacrifice" (i.e. forgoing an alternative). Economists describe this sacrifice as the "opportunity cost" or "real cost" of the decision that is taken (e.g. every pound spent on the health service is a pound not spent on some other public service) and it is one, which is faced by individuals, organisations (including firms), governments and society alike. (Worthington & Britton, 2000: 82).
Join now!


Because resources are scarce or finite, and human wants are infinite, society has to construct economic systems to resolve the resulting conflict. There are three aspects to this conflict:

. An economic system has to decide what to produce. In what proportion will it produce cars, or nuclear bombs, or flower pots? (Refer to appendix, 1.1).

2. It has to decide how to produce its goods and services. In what proportion will it use labour or machines, for instance? (Refer to appendix, 1.2).

3. It has to decide for whom production is to take place. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay