The Dearing Report ’Higher Education in a Learning Society’ (1997) made explicit the requirements and expectations of the government, bringing the skills debate to the fore. It promoted the development of key skills and significance of work experience. Since then, however, the discussion has further developed to include the issues of employability and work related learning.
What is Employability?
There are various interpretations of the term employability. If there is some disagreement about what employability is, at least it is a bit clearer what employability is not; ie, it is not the same as employment. Employment refers to having a job, whilst employability, or being employable, refers to the qualities needed to maintain employment and progress in the workplace (Lees, 2002). Fundamentally then, employability is about learning – learning how to learn – and employability is not a product, but a process (LTSN Generic Centre).
Knight and Yorke (2003) define employability as "a set of achievements, understandings and personal attributes that make individuals more likely to gain employment and be successful in their chosen careers“ and Lees (2002) concludes that employability is a difficult concept to define "much more complex than the relatively restrictive key skills agenda focused on by Dearing“.
However, other studies point out that traditional definifitions of employability “concentrate overmuch on the attributes and motivations of the individual, at the expense of a consideration of some of the wider environmental factors that impinge on the individual’s ability to take up employment“(Report of the Taskforce on Employability and Long Term Unemployment, p. 21, 2002). I think this wider definition is important because the issue of employability is not just one of knowledge, skills, motivation and personal attributes but also one of the the barriers to work, such as travel or childcare. The Taskforce identify a range of interconnected factors such as personal attributes, managing in the labour market, personal circumstances and structural aspects, all of which widen the definition of employability.
If basic skills are the building blocks for further learning and more advanced skills, they can be fundamental to other forms of learning and development that is relevant to the workplace and the labour market in general. Lack of basic skills therefore will be a barrier to any form of progression in the workplace or the labour market more generally. Hence, they will directly affect employability.
The Changing Labour Market
Changes such as rise of flexible working patterns, rise in part-time employment and rising female employment (especially in service industries) have seen the development of a much more flexible labour market in which employment patterns change quite quickly, the knock-on effect of which has important economic and social implications.
The labour market is constantly evolving and this has implications for everybody involved in the world of work. Because the nature of the economy changes it is expected that structural changes in the pattern of employment take place but one of the main long term structural changes in recent years has been the shift from manufacturing to services industries. There has been a long decline in manufacturing employment in the economy and an increase in service sector employment. Technological change has meant that many jobs that, in the past, required few skills are themselves becoming more demanding in skill terms, the result of which is that those people who are poorly skilled or whose skills are redundant in a modern economy will keep experience difficulties in finding and keeping work.
Therefore, much of the reason behind the current need for better basic skills lies in changes in the workplace itself. Jaine Chisholm-Caunt, Director for the Workplace Basic Skills Network explained this: “We do not have so many low-skilled jobs any more. Take a person who has been working in manufacturing for 30-40 years and who left school with no qualifications...over that period the job has changed. Computers have been brought in, new kinds of quality standards which mean the employee may have to get NVQs as a minimum qualification. That person might now have to hold team meetings and communicate with clients...“ (New Statesman, 2004).
Initiatives to increase Employability
There is no doubt that lack of basic skills is a signigicant barrier for a large number of those seeking work. Currently it is estimated that roughly a third of unemployed people in England have literacy, language and/or numeracy needs that prevent them from finding and keeping secure work. From April 2001 the Employment Service has been screening clients for basic skills needs. Following the screening, those who may have a basic skills need are offered the opportunity of an independent assessment. Following that, those who need it may be referred for basic employability training or basic skills provision. Initiatives such as ’New Deal’ are part of current government strategy to get people back to work, including training and job preparation. The emphasis here is very much on work or education activity. New Deal offers either a subsidised job, work and training with a voluntary or environmental group, or studying full time for a qualification, thereby enhancing employability skills.
Programmes such as Sure Start seek to support children and their families and can act as a bridge for parents into education, training and employment and often work in socially deprived areas. In particular they promote the employability of parents, defining employability as “the capacity to gain and keep a job, to cope with changes at work and in the wider economy, and the ability to get a new job if necessary“(Improving the Employability of Parents in Sure Start Local Programmes, 2004). Sure Start state employment has a direct impact on incomes, thereby lifting families out of poverty and research suggest this can have significant effects on children’s mental health, behaviour and social integration. There is also evidence to show that children with employed parents do better at school and therefore improve their own learning potential.
The Government’s ’Learning to Succeed White Paper’ (2000) highlighted the need to develop the skills of Britain’s workforce. More recently the government acknowledged the vital role skills play in an individual’s chances of success:
“.. A skilled workforce is also important for the wider health of the economy and for UK employers – improving productivity and increasing prosperity. Adults in the workforce with low skills must be supported to develop their potential if we are to increase productivity and tackle social exclusion”. (Developing skills in the UK workforce, 2002)
Indeed besides literacy and numeracy there are other basic skills that are now considered to be equally as important in the workplace. These ‘key’ skills are sometimes referred to as ‘workplace basic skills’ and include communication skills, competence in basic IT and ‘soft’ skills such as teamwork, customer care, attitude and adaptability.
It is estimated that around 8 million members of the workforce have ‘low’ skills, that is, skills below the level 2 standard. This means the UK has a record worse than any other European country. Across Europe around 10% of the population falls into the low skills category; in Britain the figure is over 20% and while over 30 per cent of those in employment in the UK have low skills, this compares to only 17 per cent of workers in Germany (Institute of Education, 2003). Those with higher levels of skill receive significantly more training than those at lower levels. According to the National Skills Taskforce, when surveyed, 19 per cent of employees qualified to level 4 (degree equivalent) had received training in the last four weeks compared to 8 per cent of those qualified below level 2. People employed in small firms also receive less training than those employed in large firms (Developing Skills in the UK Workforce, 2002). Consequently then, low skilled workers are more likely to receive less training than their more highly skilled colleagues.
A report by the Adult Learning Inspectorate suggests that although work-based training has improved, those with the fewest skills to start with are getting a “uniformly raw deal“ and that provision for the 5 million adult learners was “inadequate“. David Sherlock, Chief Inspector of Adult Learning, expressed concern over findings that the lowest-skilled members of society are the most likely to receive a bad learning experience and that this “routinely fails them to achieve their goal of economic independence“ (BBC News, 2004).
Learning to Succeed also (2000) pointed out that everyone needs access to education and training and skills development opportunities and emphasised the need for a “commitment to mainstreaming equal opportunities throughout policy making, implementation and service delivery“.
Employers have not historically seen basic skills as their responsibility, despite the fact that basic skills problems cost UK employers an estimated £4.8 billion each year and that in improving their skills, employees can have the best possible chances at work.
The Workplace Basic Skills Network has been at the forefront of developments in basic skills and states that the central and overriding principle that emerges from its reasearch and analysis of several hundred case studies is the importance of delivering basic skills workplace learning holistically, that is when literacy and numeracy are seen as part of an organisation’s overall development initiatives, not as a kind of ’remedial’ training for poorly performing staff. Historically, they claim in the UK, basic skills have been offered as a ’bolt-on’ provision, separate from other training but focusing on worker’s shortcomings can reinforce a culture of individual blame and responsibility when really the responsiblity is a shared one.
A survey by the Association of Colleges found the assumption “that the acquisition of skills has to happen in schools and colleges“ is still prevalent. The LSC is reponsible for all post-16 education and training outside universities, including further educaiton colleges, work-based learning and adult education. A recent survey by the LSC found that a lack of motivation and their own failure to train staff were reported by almost a third of bosses. A total of 2.4 million workers were classed by their employers as not being fully proficient in their current job – equivalent to 11% of the total workforce (BBC News, 2004).
This has not gone unnoticed. In December 2004 Gordon Brown announced a shake-up of work based training as part of a package designed to improve adults’ poor basic skills, which he complained were Britain’s “achilles’ heel“(Guardian, 2004). He told MPs: “Today 30% of employees have very low skills or no skills at all...for decades, low skills have been our achilles’ heel as a modern economy....“. He pointed to a new “brokerage“ service to enable employers assess employee training needs to run alongside the government’s core offer of giving employees who lack basic skills paid time to train for a first level two qualification.
In my own practice we have spent a considerable amount of time and effort working closely with local businesses and local government in providing skills for life courses.
At Walkers crisp factory we opened a Skills for Life centre which later became a Learn Direct centre. Learning then involved employees’ families, the local community and schools who could use the centre to draw people into the learning culture. Learners could access additional support from tutors and it is now an accredited test centre. It uses innovative ways to attract learners such as using digital cameras or shopping on the Internet – these involve using skills such as estimating image sizes, calculating money and filling in online forms. Many benefits have been seen by the company – 2003 saw their lowest ever absence rate of 4.1%.
We also run the ’Push Ahead project’ for Durham City Council employees. The project began by targeting the Environmental Services Department - all employees were given a questionnaire to survey their learning needs. Union Learning Reps delivered and collected the questionnaires and offered help in completing them. Due to this level of help, the return rate was over 95%, much greater than we expected. The questionnaires were analysed to ascertain which course had been most requested and those requiring basic skills were interviewed. Dyslexia screening was also offered to those who felt they needed it. A series of 4 hour tasters was provided – with topics such as Understanding your Payslip, Budgeting and Report Writing. A 10 week Brush up your English and similar maths course then ran. We now run various IT courses and as word has spread, the take-up rate has increased significantly. Courses often take place between 4-6pm, sometimes starting with a coffee break as workers arrive straight from shift and the council pays 1-hour overtime per 2-hour course and offers transport home to those who need it.
The crucial thing about this project was that Union Learning Reps were instrumental in breaking down barriers and offering 1-1 support. They offered a direct connection between us, Community Education as a provider, and the workers who initially perceived us as something of a threat. The Learning Reps set an example to the workers by doing the courses themselves and on one of the courses I taught, stayed on after their own course ended to offer assistance and support to new workers coming in.
Conclusion
Low levels of basic skill are strongly associated with low levels of educational attainment, routine, low paid occupations and higher levels of social deprivation. Basic skills are the foundation for other forms of learning relevant to the workplace and the labour market more generally. There is no doubt that lack of basic skills significantly contribute to worklessness. More generally they can lead to social exclusion. Those who lack basic skills are also more likely to lack key skills which employers regard as relevant to the workplace, skills such as communication, basic IT, attitude and adaptability. Lack of basic and key skills can undermine personal motivation and confidence, and thus further limit the employability of individuals.
The priority is to improve the skills of those groups where literacy and numeracy needs are greatest and where they can make the most impact including the unemployed and benefit claimants, low skilled people in the workforce and other excluded groups.
Up to half of the estimated 7 million adults with literacy and numeracy needs will be in jobs, coping well because of the knowledge of the job and the experience they have built up over the years. A further difficulty comes with the changes that people are increasingly expected to face at work. With the introduction of new working practices and new technologies, the level of skill required is becoming greater and people with poor basic skills can find it more difficult to adapt. Many organisations have an ‘embedded’ approach where the course on offer is, for example, ICT but all the time the basic skills of the learner are being observed. Those who need it can be offered help as appropriate. Schemes aimed at improving basic skills for the least qualified staff are far more likely to succeed where the course is advertised as vocational training rather than labelled as basic skills.
Therefore, basic skills are inherently linked to employability but employability is not restricted to the unemployed, it is essential for those who are employed continue to develop their skills to maintain their employability in the 21st century.
Interagency co-operation is essential in dealing with the problem. Organisations such as Jobcentre Plus, the prison service, employers, trade unions and community initiatives can identify individuals with lack of basic or key skills and encourage them to take action.
Bibliography:
Anon (2004) One in 10 workers incompetent. BBC News,
(), date accessed 25/01/05
Dearing, Department for Education and Employment (1998) The Learning Age, Cm 3790, Stationery Office
Department for Education and Employment (2000) Learning to Succeed, HMSO
Department for Employment and Learning, Belfast (2002) Report of the Taskforce on Employability and Long-Term Unemployment, p.21
Developing skills in the UK workforce (2002) (, date accessed 20/02/05
Fryer, R. H. (1997) Learning for the Twenty-First Century, National Advisory Group for Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning
Hawkins, P (1999) The Art of Building Windmills. Graduate into Employment Unit
Kennedy, H (1997) Learning Works, Widening Participation in Further Education. FEFC
Knight, P. T. And Yorke, M (2003) Learning, Curriculum and Employability in Higher Education, London:Routledge
Lees, D (2002) Graduate Employability, University of Exeter
LTSN Generic Centre (2002) Employability Guide to Current Practice Learning, Teaching and Assessment in Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism, LTSN Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism
, date accessed 20/02/05
Meadows, P and Garbers, C. (2004) Improving the Employability of Parents in Sure Start Local Programmes, Institute for the Study of Children, Families & Social Issues
Moser, C, et al (1999) A Fresh Start, DfEE Publications, Nottingham
New Statesman (2004) Adult Basic Skills – Who is Responsible?
http://www.newstatesman.com/supplements, date accessed 04/02/05
Parsons, S and Bynner, J. (2002) Basic skills and social exclusion, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education for the Basic Skills Agency
Skills and Learning Intelligence Module (2002) Adult Basic Skills in the Workplace, University of Exeter
Smithers, R. (2004) The Achilles Heel of Britain’s Skills Deficit. The Guardian, Friday, December