Previous to the attacks, the US economy was in a slump following recent boom years.27 The attacks led to two consecutive quarters of contraction. By the National Bureau of Economic Research’s definition, the economy fell into recession, which in normal circumstances the US had been expected to avoid.28
This was caused by a lack of confidence in the economy, and changes in consumer behaviour nationwide. “September 11 caused people to be less inclined to consume, lowering the velocity of money.”29 Consumer spending and investment are a vital part of the economic cycle. If consumers stop spending, then companies do not receive the capital they need to continue producing and investing. The less producers produce, the less consumers consume and a downward spiral begins. Gradually the flow of money begins to dry up, GDP figures drop, and, eventually, if the government do not intervene, the economy comes to a standstill.30
To avoid this happening the government must reduce uncertainty and stimulate growth. It is argued, “consumption is entirely a function of income.”31 Hence the US government implemented fiscal policy to raise disposable incomes and encourage spending, by issuing tax rebates.32 This was teamed with monetary policy where interest rates were cut to discourage saving and encourage investment.33
Although such policies will help in the short-term and create investment through the multiplier effect, they cannot be sustained long-term.34 Teamed with the cost of war, the increased demand for transfer payments due to increased unemployment, and the “federal reimbursement for rescue, cleanup and infrastructure repair costs,”35 they would create enormous government deficits.
President Bush “shifted federal resources to the war against terrorism”36 at a cost to many other government reliant schemes. This is not merely a short-term plan; he has “proposed spending increases of $48 billion in fiscal year 2003 and $120 billion over the next five years.”37 Increased security costs and insurance premiums will raise expenditures in the private sector as well. These costs “will not increase the quantity or quality of production,”38 and will probably be passed onto the consumer through higher prices. “The transformation into an always-on war economy will not only make the recession more severe but will drag on economic growth for years to come.”39
Following the attack many firms have “re-evaluated the geographic concentration of their talent and facilities.”40 Therefore, in the longer-term, areas outside of New York are likely to see further private investment. This may result in reduced turnover for the small New York firms who supply specialist services to the larger ones. Their market will no longer be concentrated in the immediate vicinity and their large clients will switch to other, more local and cost-effective suppliers.
Globalisation meant that the economic consequences were felt across other global economies as well. Many of the companies situated in the World Trade Center had international insurers, who, particularly in Great Britain, suffered major losses.41 Insurance claims are estimated at about $37 billion.42 In the long-term the multiplier effect is estimated to have a positive impact of $47 billion, of which foreign insurers are unlikely to benefit.43
Passenger numbers on all international routes immediately declined following the attack, not just those to America. “Passengers using (British Airway’s) seven UK airports fell by 10 per cent in the (third) quarter.”44 Combined with the fear that other major cities would be targeted, “all major travel destinations saw substantial declines in travel and tourism.”45 As in America, hotel, restaurant and tourist attraction turnover fell, causing a ripple effect on their suppliers. “September 11 hit Regent Inns sales at their nine unbranded pubs around London.”46
“In spite of the sharp downturn in business travel, many European business travellers paid more for trips than before September 11.”47 The airline industry had to cover their fixed costs. Fewer passengers meant increased costs per head and therefore higher prices per person.48 Despite these higher prices, the large international airlines were reporting extensive losses.49 The small, “no frills” airline carriers, which do not fly to America, have lower overheads and weathered the short-term storm more easily. They gained market share from the larger firms, which is likely to last into the medium and long-term. However all airfares will increase in the long-term, as airline industries pass on additional costs of new security.
The downturn in economic activity and air travel has “noticeably reduced world oil demand… The OPEC cartel is negotiating…to reduce production so as to stabilize prices.”50 Confidence in the global financial market also plummeted, causing a bare market as share prices fell worldwide. The threat of recession spread and investment markets weakened.51 The result was a short-term rise in the demand for gold as investors looked for security.52
“Property owners in big US cities are being asked to pay up to 10 times as much for terrorism insurance as they did before September 11, and property deals are beginning to fall through as a result.”53 This may also happen globally in the long-term. With the increased risk of terrorist attacks, firms producing security devices will see a sudden surge in demand, and investment in research and development will become more profitable.54
“The long-term impact of the terrorist attacks will be to reinforce the pressures of the current US slowdown, and to extend it globally.”55 The United States import a lot of goods from abroad. Due to the recession, demand for these goods will fall, affecting foreign producers’ profit margins. This could lead to the lay-off of workers, and in the long-term, the spread of recession.55 “Growth through innovation will slow down” and many suppliers developing new or untested products will suffer.56 Badly hit will be the developing countries that produce commodities for the States, because as demand for commodities fall, prices will follow.57 The attacks may also result in a slowdown of future globalisation.58
In conclusion, the economic consequences of September 11th will be felt worldwide for many years to come and they highlighted the importance of government intervention within a market driven economy. The attacks were a shock to many industries and created uncertainty. In order to minimise these effects the government and private enterprise must pull together and invest. Globalisation and the growing trend towards a single, interdependent, global market meant that shock waves were felt internationally. September 11th showed firms how such reliance can be detrimental, and reinforced the need to spread risk.
1,768 words
References
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, Sept 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
Fiscal Policy Institute, Sept 28 2001, Economic Impact of the September 11 World Trade Center Attack, Preliminary Report,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
Fiscal Policy Institute, Sept 28 2001, Economic Impact of the September 11 World Trade Center Attack, Preliminary Report,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
Fiscal Policy Institute, Sept 28 2001, Economic Impact of the September 11 World Trade Center Attack, Preliminary Report,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
- Anderton. Alain, 2000, Economics – Third Edition, Lancashire, Causeway Press Ltd., pg. 24
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
John M. Olin, September 2001, Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation,
-
Mark Odell, Feb 5, 2002, BAA says recovery will take time, http://www.FT.com
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
Fiscal Policy Institute, Sept 28 2001, Economic Impact of the September 11 World Trade Center Attack, Preliminary Report,
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
John M. Olin, September 2001, Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation,
-
John M. Olin, September 2001, Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation,
-
John M. Olin, September 2001, Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation,
-
John M. Olin, September 2001, Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation,
- Anderton. Alain, 2000, Economics – Third Edition, Lancashire, Causeway Press Ltd., pg. 156
, Wednesday October 17 2001, Rebates Won't Stimulate The Economy, Opinion Editorial,
, Wednesday October 17 2001, Rebates Won't Stimulate The Economy, Opinion Editorial,
, Wednesday October 17 2001, Rebates Won't Stimulate The Economy, Opinion Editorial,
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
, Wednesday October 17 2001, Rebates Won't Stimulate The Economy, Opinion Editorial,
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
Adam Entous, Mon Feb 4, 9:14 AM ET, Bush Unveils Budget to Address 'New Realities',
Adam Entous, Mon Feb 4, 9:14 AM ET, Bush Unveils Budget to Address 'New Realities',
Chairman Jim Saxton, November 2, 2001, October Employment Situation, Press Release, Congress of the United States Joint Economic Committee,
Steven Rattner, Thursday, November 8, 2001, War Is Hell - Especially on the economy, Pg A31, http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
Daily Policy Digest Terrorism Issues, Tuesday, October 09, 2001, Vast Economic Changes Four Weeks After, http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
Mark Odell, Feb 5, 2002, BAA says recovery will take time,
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, September 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
David Blackwell, Feb 7, 2002, Companies and Finance UK and: Regent Inns held back by September 11, Financial Times
Roger Bray, Feb 5, 2002, INSIDE TRACK: Cost of business trips rises TRAVEL UPDATE, Financial Times;
Anderton. Alain, 2000, Economics – Third Edition, Lancashire, Causeway Press Ltd., pg. 310
Mark Odell, Feb 5, 2002, BAA says recovery will take time,
The Likely Outcome for the Economy: Demand Effects and Oil Prices,
Adrienne Roberts, Feb 7, 2002, Gold climbs high as investors seek safety, Financial Times London
Adrienne Roberts, Feb 7, 2002, Gold climbs high as investors seek safety, Financial Times London
Alison Beard, Feb 26, 2002, GLOBAL INVESTING: Terror insurance hurts property deals: Urban real estate deals are under threat from a lack of affordable cover following the September 11 attacks, Financial Times
Andrew Ward, Feb 8, 2002, ASIA-PACIFIC: Demand for biometric ID devices rises, Financial Times
> , November 07 2001, Economic Downs - and Ups
> , November 07 2001, Economic Downs - and Ups
> , November 07 2001, Economic Downs - and Ups
Steven Rattner, Thursday, November 8, 2001, War Is Hell - Especially on the economy, Pg A31, http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/
Bibliography
-
New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce Executive summary, Sept 2001, Economic Impact Analysis of the September 11th Attack on New York,
-
Fiscal Policy Institute, Sept 28 2001, Economic Impact of the September 11 World Trade Center Attack, Preliminary Report,
- Anderton. Alain, 2000, Economics – Third Edition, Lancashire, Causeway Press Ltd.
-
John M. Olin, September 2001, Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation,
-
Mark Odell, Feb 5, 2002, BAA says recovery will take time,
-
, Wednesday October 17 2001, Rebates Won't Stimulate The Economy, Opinion Editorial,
-
Adam Entous, Mon Feb 4, 9:14 AM ET, Bush Unveils Budget to Address 'New Realities',
-
Chairman Jim Saxton, November 2, 2001, October Employment Situation, Press Release, Congress of the United States Joint Economic Committee,
-
Steven Rattner, Thursday, November 8, 2001, War Is Hell - Especially on the economy, Pg A31,
-
Daily Policy Digest Terrorism Issues, Tuesday, October 09, 2001, Vast Economic Changes Four Weeks After,
- David Blackwell, Feb 7, 2002, Companies and Finance UK and: Regent Inns held back by September 11, Financial Times
- Roger Bray, Feb 5, 2002, INSIDE TRACK: Cost of business trips rises TRAVEL UPDATE, Financial Times
-
The Likely Outcome for the Economy: Demand Effects and Oil Prices,
- Adrienne Roberts, Feb 7, 2002, Gold climbs high as investors seek safety, Financial Times London
- Alison Beard, Feb 26, 2002, GLOBAL INVESTING: Terror insurance hurts property deals: Urban real estate deals are under threat from a lack of affordable cover following the September 11 attacks, Financial Times
- Andrew Ward, Feb 8, 2002, ASIA-PACIFIC: Demand for biometric ID devices rises, Financial Times
> , November 07 2001, Economic Downs - and Ups