Survival in the Face of Oppression In Solzhennitsyn's One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich and Kafka's The Metamorphosis.

Authors Avatar

In both One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, written by Solzhenitsyn, and The Metamorphosis, written by Kafka, there were struggles for survival in face of oppression.  Both of the protagonists had lost control of their own lives and were forced to fight to keep the little control that they had. Shukov, a character created by Solzhenitsyn, was imprisoned in a Stalinist labour camp designed to attack its prisoners’ physical and spiritual dignity. Gregor from The Metamorphosis became isolated in his own house after being transformed into a bug. He could not communicate with his family and he increasingly became a financial and emotional burden on his family, because of this they alienated him from the rest of the Samsa’s. In these characters’ struggle for survival we see three main factors to their ability to survive: cooperation, attitude and food.

        First, cooperation would obviously be a key element for survival. This became evident in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich. Squads that worked together, survived. The members of the 104th squad worked together and depended on one another to get their assignments done. If one member of the squad did not complete a task, the whole squad would be punished.  Therefore, being able to depend on your squad and squad leader was essential.  There were personal advantages to having friends in the prison as well.  For example, because Ivan showed kindness toward Caesar by standing in line for him, he got Caesar’s share of supper and some food from the package Caesar had received.  The prisoners being able to depend on one another to complete tasks and to share were huge factors in their survival in the prison camp.  Dependence in The Metamorphosis was also important. Although in this case it was more the lack of dependence.  Gregor was isolated from his family and from society.  Despite his sister’s minimal effort to feed Gregor, he received no aid from anyone throughout the novel.  If he were able to depend on his family like Ivan could his friends he probably would have survived. His family simply turned their back on him the moment that they could not depend on him. This shows a similar message as to the message in Solzhenitsyn’s writing about dependence within the groups. Both authors showed, from different sides, how dependance is vital to survival.

Join now!

        Second, the two novels use personal attitudes as a factor in the characters’ struggle for survival.  In One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, the prisoners had hope.  Ivan, personally, lived each day and tried to make the best out of life in prison.  He had a positive attitude toward the prison because he focused on only the positive events that occurred during his day.  He did not complain about the negative events that occurred, he only had pure determination to get through it.  “Shukov complained about nothing: neither about the length of his stretch, nor about the length ...

This is a preview of the whole essay