• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Free Speech Double Standards.

Extracts from this document...


Mark Klinker 3/6/03 Essay 2.6 Free Speech Double Standards Though people may be opposed to them, we live in a world today that says it is alright to have double standards because they do exist. Some say women cannot hold jobs just because they are women, and men are able just because they are men. We hold men out of baseball for gambling, and allow others to stay instated even after repeat drug offenses. Our freedom of speech is often looked upon as having many double standards. The First Amendment has many different interpretations that can be used as a way to incriminate or protect a person. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"(Constitution). What does "Free Speech" actually mean? Our forefathers left the interpretation up to us. Through the years, these different interpretations have lead to many different forms of speech which are considered legal or illegal. Speech is defined as any act of communication between two or more people. ...read more.


Others abuse their power through the use of words. Some believe that free speech entitles them as a person to say whatever they want. But it doesn't. The use of fighting words is considered to be an offensive act and is therefore illegal in the United States. You can however wear or give a gesture that is offensive to another and have the legal right to do so. An example of this would be if you walked up to a Jewish person and said, "Hail Hitler", you would be legally responsible if a fight then occurred. On the flip side of this situation, if you were to wear a swastika symbol on a shirt and proceeded to get into a fight with a Jewish person, the Jewish person would be legally responsible. How does this occur? Can't a symbol be considered a fighting word? My Business Law professor, Roland Carlton, a practicing lawyer, said a symbol is not considered to be offensive to others according to the law. He also stated during class that the person wearing the symbol must confront another person with the symbol for it to be considered offensive; otherwise it is just a symbol on a shirt without any meaning at all. ...read more.


Ignorance of the law does not save you from our legal system. Mark Twain said it best when he stated, "It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence to never practice either of them" (Miller, 173). Freedom of speech is the most prized freedom that Americans have. Without it we would not be able to express our disgust of political actions or policies. Our nation was formed on the basis of expressing our opinions without being persecuted for expressing our thoughts. This forms the foundation of our democratic system. But the line must be drawn somewhere. There are too many double standards that cause certain actions to be legal and others to be illegal. Freedom of speech should be granted to any words, actions, signs, or symbols used that do not infringe on the rights of any other human being and are not considered offensive. If we allow others to abuse their free speech privileges, then out system begins to be abused. Allowing people to express their opinions should never be taken away, but to a certain extent should be regulated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Reviews of Personal Performances section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Reviews of Personal Performances essays

  1. Matrimonial consent - in the eyes of the law.

    bond is unfitting if a person bind himself to what he cannot give or do, so the marriage contract is unfitting, if it be made by one who cannot give or do, so the marriage contract is unfitting if it be made by one who cannot pay the marital debt 3."

  2. "Explain the meaning of authority in relation to the public services"Authority:This can be defined ...

    have the obligation to follow commands from higher ranks, so legitimate commands should be followed without question. In most occasions it would be unacceptable to question orders as this would be seen as questioning your superior's authority. Disobedience: It is necessary to maintain good discipline levels as lack of discipline would cause chaos and put people's lives at risk.

  1. Types of abuse.

    This is because there could be pressure forming all on one spot. This leads to a sore forming on the skin. A pad must be applied so that the sore heals. A career in the care home may not be giving the client specific attention, this could result in the client getting bedsores.

  2. Describe the nature, qualities and essential object of matrimonial consent according to Canon law ...

    in giving consent and in realizing a true community of life and conjugal love as understood by the Christian community does not 4. The incapacity referred to in canon 1095 is a juridical one, even though the motives that cause such juridical incapacity are of a psychological nature.

  1. Our stimulus for these Dramas was the play "a legal weapon" by Mark Wheeller.

    We showed for the first time in the play how Andy actually felt a lot smaller than some body else. I think that this was really good because it showed a different side to Andy. We acted out this part of the play quite early during our assessment period; I

  2. We had to create a tableaux image of the four strong words in the ...

    The characters I played in this piece were; a father in the still image for 'love', a father in the still image for 'hate, I was part of the circle in our representation of 'peace' and I played someone having just killed another person in 'war'.

  1. Drama exercise on 'women of courage'.

    This helped me further to understand the emotions running through both of them in this time and also showed me lots of reasons for and against Edith going home. The third task was in pairs of Edith being visited by the Princess.

  2. Inspector's Final Speech

    For example: If a scenario like this did arise and a person wanted to commit suicide and they confided in a close friend or family and the person they confided in talked them out of it, then the person who wanted to do it would be grateful and so would

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work