Why be good?

Authors Avatar

Josh Igoe – 5th October 2003 – Philosophy and Ethics

Why Be Good?

What does "being good,” mean? Are integrity and character important? Is being "ethically fit" beneficial to us in the here and now? Philosophers, spiritual thinkers, and religious leaders have pondered these questions throughout the ages. They are even harder to answer today, when it seems as if the fame and fortune of others are a result of so much outrageous, unethical, and just plain bad behaviour. Is striving to be a good person worth it in a world where, too often, people seem to get ahead by being bad? What does being "ethically fit" do for us in the long run? As we are well into the millennium, is being "moral" an old-fashioned notion or a modern human necessity? Do our politicians, corporations, public institutions, and small businesses really profit when they leave ethics behind? In a time when behaving badly is financially rewarded, the question must be asked, why be good?

In order to be able to fully answer the question, one must first evaluate the criteria on which the value Good is associated upon. What is good? What is bad? These are the questions, which must first be answered before we can truly understand why to be good or bad.
In John Stewart Mill’s opinion and my eyes, it is much easier to determine what a bad event is, rather than a good one. The reason for this is simple. If the end result of the action is harm, it is therefore bad.
Anything, which harms the body or the mind of a person, can therefore be classified as bad. So, in accordance John Stewart Mill’s harm theory to define a good action would be also easy. Meaning that anything, which
doesn’t cause harm is a good action. However, this is where the problems begin to arise, as the very much black and white clear area of bad, is now a grey unclear area for good. Questions and examples can be brought forward to challenge Mill’s Harm theory of good and bad.

Join now!

For example, in accordance to John Mill’s theory, if I am watching a young child drown in a river, I would be doing a good action. This is classed as a good action in this theory because I am not causing any harm to the child, who is drowning, and therefore I am not creating harm myself, and so I am good.

Now it is clear that its certainly impossible to use John Stewart Mill’s harm theory to class what a good or a bad action is, so I’m right back where I started. So Lets take a new approach.

Lets ...

This is a preview of the whole essay