A Doll's House "Conflict is the Essence of All Drama"

Authors Avatar

A Doll’s House

“Conflict is the Essence of All Drama”

In every play, there is always conflict. Without it, the story would simply be dull and boring. There would be no lessons learnt and nothing that keeps the story going. Everyone has different opinions and perceptions about particular things and this is why conflict occurs – everyone is human and that is the reality. The different kinds of conflict include the conflict between individuals, within the individual and conflict with society.

In Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House, there is evidence that all three of these kinds of conflict exists.

Firstly, Helmer objectifies Nora. For example; “My darling. No one else’s. My sweetheart, my treasure.” (Act 3 Lines 207-208). He also called her names like “my little songbird… my little squirrel” (Act 1 Lines7-10) and “little featherbrain” (Act 1 Line 94). This demonstrates that he really does not know her he only knows his version of her. All this had led to a dishonest and an unopened relationship between Helmer and Nora. There are a number occasions when Nora had lied or misrepresented the truth. She had forged her father’s signature in order to get money from Krogstad for Torvald (Helmer) and she had also said things behind Torvald’s back which reveals her true feelings or personality; “When he’s tired of me dancing, reciting, dressing up. Then I may need something in reserve” (Act 1 Lines 410-411). Torvald had a certain view of her (being all innocent and dependant) which we discover is totally wrong by the end of the play. “I should have expected it. I should have known. Like father – sh! – like daughter. No religion, no ethics, no sense of duty.” (Act 3 Lines 376-378).

Join now!

Although it is hard to see, money is the major determinant for conflict in this play. That is, if everyone had money, there wouldn’t be any need of struggle. “I’d a bedridden mother and two small brothers. We couldn’t wait for you, Nils. You’d no prospects then”, Mrs. Linde exclaimed to Krogstad (from Act 3 Lines 31-33). This shows that Mrs. Linde wouldn’t have been married to her husband if he didn’t have money. Money has also been the main source of destruction for Torvald and Nora. Nora wouldn’t have had to borrow money if they did have money ...

This is a preview of the whole essay