• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

He may be entertaining, he may be clever, but Falstaff is morally repulsive and Hal should be having nothing to do with him. Discuss this comment fully with relation to Henry IV part one

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"He may be entertaining, he may be clever, but Falstaff is morally repulsive and Hal should be having nothing to do with him." Discuss this comment fully with relation to Henry IV part one Throughout Henry IV part 1 Falstaff introduces and sustains most, if not all of the comic value of this play. Though primarily a humorous figure, Falstaff still exemplifies a kind of depth common to Shakespeare's complicated comedy. However, how is it, when his actions would repulse many in both a modern and medieval context, we find ourselves so attracted to him. This is perhaps a na�ve and unanswerable question; most of the audience however, are so compelled to this '...huge hill of flesh' (2.4.202) that they completely ignore the abhorrence of his banter. It is in fact believed that the Queen of England requested the making of 'The Merry Wives of Windsor' which is a Shakespearian comedy that revolves around the character of Falstaff. Whether this is true or not, it still shows how this lovable oaf seems to escape trouble through his expressions. It illustrates his immeasurable popularity with people of all ages and of all fields to the extent that a man may escape inexorable situations. Whether any of this should actually affect his relationship with the prince is a different story. Falstaff and Hal have an exceptionally strong relationship from the start of the play and it is somewhat obvious that Falstaff is Hal's entertainer. ...read more.

Middle

This offence is particularly momentous because Hal calls him a 'misleader of youth'. If Hal is referring to himself as 'youth' then he is agreeing that Falstaff is doing him no good and that he would be better off without him. These frequent offences are happening all the time and are not specifically concentrated to a certain scene or section. Hal is therefore not having an unsystematic surge of loathe towards Falstaff but is in fact showing the audience how he regularly acts and possibly how he truly feels. If Falstaff is failing to satisfy Hal's pleasure then Hal has no advantage of being or even knowing Falstaff. Despite all accusations, Falstaff and Hal have a powerful relationship to the extent that Falstaff could replace the King in the role of Hal's Father. Act 2 scene 4 in particular shows this side to their friendship, it shows them acting as father and son yet these two roles do appear to fit them well. Hal tells Falstaff to '...stand for my father and examine me upon the particulars/of my life' (2.4.310-311), thus demonstrating Hal's attitude and possibly his requirements. This has established Hal's need for Falstaff; this is also true the other way round. Falstaff too has a desperate need for Hal, a need for someone he can take care of and love, a need for a son. ...read more.

Conclusion

It has shown Falstaff as a thief and literally stealing away Hal's honour. This strengthens the argument against Hal's relationship with Falstaff, that perhaps Falstaff is only using Hal for his own benefit. Falstaff frequently speaks about honour and it is made very possible and almost inevitable that Falstaff is in search for more honour, this source could indeed be Hal, Falstaff's supposed friend. It is acknowledged that Falstaff is Hal's entertainer as well as his friend. They bond together incredibly well all through the play yet to the extent that their affiliation could deceive individuals to be as far as father and son. However, despite this physically and mentally powerful relationship, Hal is frequently speaking of Falstaff's negative side and showing his observations of how Falstaff has a dull and declining outlook. Falstaff however, is telling Hal of his bountiful future and is attempting to maintain their relationship, quite divergent to Hal. This could be for Falstaff's benefit to both stay close to people of a high importance or as a supply of honour. Throughout most of the play it is made rather oblivious that Hal is trying to eschew Falstaff from his presence, yet at the end the roles seem to reverse; Falstaff betrays Hal but Hal maintains the relationship. Therefore Hal should not let Falstaff's outrageous banter affect their relationship because they are strongly connected and deep down inside, they both want to maintain their relationship with one another despite Hal having other things to attend to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Other Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Other Plays essays

  1. How and why does the character of Scrooge change?

    In the first stave, Scrooge uses negative, short sentences, giving brash answers and terse instructions. He is unwelcoming and insecure; his Nephew's caring attitude when querying Scrooge's dismissal of a dining proposal, is responded to with the repeated use of "Good afternoon."

  2. Compare and contrast the relationship between Hal and Henry IV and the relationship between ...

    The relationships he has with these two can have powerful similarities at times, however at other times they seem most controversial. Falstaff is a long term friend of Hal and can almost be considered as a father figure to him.

  1. In As You Like It Act 1 scene 2 and Act 2 scene 3 ...

    Orlando's courage here is prominently displayed by the manner of his response. He stands up to those who mock him, even though the Duke Frederick is extremely powerful in comparison to Orlando, who essentially is a mere stable boy. In Act 2 scene 3, the mere actuality of Adam's presence

  2. Henry VI Part 1

    people who he keeps in his company are worthless and allows them to be seen with him to damage his image intentionally. Hal has read Falstaff's personality because he is a true judge of character, I know you all. In this part of Hal's soliloquy he states that he will

  1. An inspector calls essay

    audience feel slightly in suspense wanting to know how he knows her, this also leads to great tension between Gerald and Sheila, and as the inspector leaves the room they begin to argue about Gerald's reaction towards the name Daisy Renton and how he knew who she was.

  2. What is John Proctor? I am no saint; for me it is fraud. I ...

    But the stage directions read that he only 'Glances' at her, an act that makes it obvious that he does not seem to return her feelings for him, as he only carelessly 'Glances' as her whereas she seems to be love struck by his presence.

  1. What does Shakespeare show us about Father Daughter relationships?

    The reason this argument comes as a shock to the readers is because in Act1 Scene2 Capulet tells Paris to wait for one more year and make Juliet fall in love with him and then he can marry Juliet. Ultimately Capulet is saying it's up to Juliet this shows how

  2. Women's Roles During The Shakespearean Era

    These women were expected to run the households and provide children. It was common to see many large families because mortality rate for children was so high. On average, a woman had a child every two years; however, several children died from sickness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work