A View From The Bridge Essay

Authors Avatar

A View from the Bridge – How does Arthur Miller show tension escalating during Act 1?

Tensions exist in families because of arguments and disagreements occurring between parents and their children especially teenagers, about boyfriends and the way they dress, which refers back to Eddie and Catherine Carbone’s disagreement in the first scene when Eddie comments on Catharine’s skirt. ‘A View from the Bridge’ was set in the 1950s in an Italian American neighbourhood under the Brooklyn Bridge in New York.  The area, which the Carbone family lived in, was called ‘Red Hook’. It is a poor place where crime, gangsters and the Mafia had been well known in recent history. Tension in the Carbone household is present right from the beginning of the play and the narrator, lawyer and family friend Alfieri warns the audience of a tragic ending in his opening speech. Alfieri also gives us some background information on the Carbone family and it sets a mood to the start of the scene.

Alfieri introduces the play, narrates the story in , focussing on key scenes, and then closes the play. Arthur Miller himself says, “ I wanted to write a play that had the cleanliness… the clear line of some of the Greek tragedies.” Meaning that the audience would be confronted with a situation and that the audience would be told in the beginning what the ending was. The question was not what was going to happen, but how it was going to happen. Each of the following aspects of the play contributes importantly to the build up of dramatic tension as the play progresses and the audience will slowly see how the tragedy will play out. Alfieri tells us at his opening speech that he was powerless” and that nothing he could have done would have altered the bloody course”. Miller also uses Alfieri to maintain the dramatic interest in the play because the audience wants to know how this “bloody course” will take place.

Join now!

Arthur Miller makes the audience question Eddie and Catherine’s relationship from the first moment they appear on stage. Miller makes us think that Eddie and Catherine are in some sort of relationship because when Catherine greets Eddie he is “pleased” and also “shy” about it. The word “pleased” show us that Eddie is happy that Catherine had greeted him, which suggests to the audience that Eddie may have a crush on Catherine because he is also “shy”, which in my opinion shows that Eddie maybe hiding his feelings for Catherine or he is attracted to her. Arthur Miller creates ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Quality of Writing The candidate's quality of written communication is excellent; his/her ideas are expressed clearly and arguments are developed and well-explained. The act is discussed at length, and the play as a whole is also taken into account. A good habit to get into, particularly if intending to continue English Literature to A-Level and beyond, is to write about characters in the text as constructs by the writer and not as people. It should be clear that the decisions and actions of characters are controlled by the writer. This is a skill that is not necessary to achieve a good grade at GCSE, but it reflects well on candidates and will give the examiner a good impression of the candidate. Spelling and grammar are also of a very high standard, with very few minor errors.

Level of Analysis The essay includes detailed and extended analysis at the level of language (the third paragraph is a good example), with focus on individual words and a discussion of the different ways they could be interpreted by the reader. The use of these skills demonstrate that the candidate is a strong English Literature student. The methodical and chronological approach to the analysis of Act 1 allows the candidate to build on the points previously made and make links to earlier parts of the essay. The conclusion reached is justified with quotations and the candidate explores the reasons Arthur Miller may have had for ending Act 1 at such a tense point in the play, with some reference to the events that are to come in the second act. These references to aspects of the play that are not explicitly included in the question shows that the candidate is a strong student and has the initiative to explore the play as a whole, and not just Act 1.

Response to Question The candidate provides a detailed examination of the different methods used by Miller to escalate tension in Act 1, building upon his/her points appropriately. Some of the content feels a little irrelevant (the paragraph on the play as a modern Greek tragedy), but putting the play into its context of production demonstrates a high level of thinking. Overall, the essay could be more succinct, but it is not an issue that would cause the candidate to lose marks.