Analyse, review and comment on the three different presentations of Simon's death in 'Lord of the Flies'

Authors Avatar

Analyse, review and comment on the three different presentations of Simon’s death in ‘Lord of the Flies’.

In exploring the breakdown into savagery of a group of boys free from the imposed moral constraints of civilization and society, Lord of the Flies dramatizes a fundamental human struggle. They conflict over the impulse to obey rules and behave morally and the impulse to indulge in brute power over others. Golding’s novel, known to have been his most compelling, symbolizes his pessimism about the natural state of human beings, their culpability and sinfulness and his own cynicism about life inevitably inform the style and tone of his writing. The castaways, who were initially cathedral choirboys of higher class yield to the fringe of repugnant behaviour and this consequents in ritual and sacrifice. Their inner natures convert to barbaric conduct resulting in the collapse of any civilised behaviour there once was to succumb to their surging urge of tribal power rather than of rescue and survival. It was Golding’s intentions to expose the beast within every one of us and to tell a ‘true’ story about the collapse of a once civilised group of boys.

        The death of Simon represented great sympathy towards characters and to a reader or audience. He portrayed an enigmatic character symbolizing Christ for one of God’s disciples was name Simon Peter. This spiritualistic idea is shown through his epileptic fits and that he is the first to die of the boys; which are revealed in all three versions of the novel including the original text itself. The black/white version shows Simon with blonde hair, which I think reflects a more prophetic view of heaven and angels than the Simon in the colour version with the brown hair does. His death was an imperative part of the novel showing that the savage boys killed the less brutal character in the novel. It is Simon who walks in the forest alone at night, who acknowledges that there may be a beast and “… maybe it’s only us.” Thus it is Simon who senses what Golding calls:   “mankind’s essential illness.” He is trying to say that man may fear darkness and solitude because they rob him of the worlds he builds with his daylight mind, and force him to live with his own interior darkness.

The dance itself is exceptionally symbolic in the novel and the film versions. It portrays a meaning beyond ritualistic actions that ever occurred on the island. It tells the reader to a time of pre-speech and where body language gave out messages, especially in the film versions where this is expressed with clothing, which gives non-verbal signals. The dance is a powerful way of communicating and it expresses many emotions across many cultures and can a story and takes place of a narrative. In Peter Brook’s black/white version, I think that the choreography is cleverly executed and collated with the military drum rolls and this has proved effective in contrast with Harry Hook’s version, where the boys use simulation. Harry Hook uses a knowledgeable technique in which he depict s the boys simulating, then emulating and this leads to devastation at Simon’s death. Expressionism and body language has been know to man to have been the most common forms of communication, and in this case gives powerful thoughts to an audience or a reader.

Join now!

Harry Hook builds up tension and suspense before the scene of Simon’s death with Jack giving dictatorial orders to the boys, such as, “Killed a pig today. There’s going to be a feast tonight”. I think this reflects cannibalistic behaviour, which signifies with the occurrence of Simon’s death.

The camera shot is taken to Simon viewing the Pig’s head. In my opinion this signifies an allegory of what has happened on the island. The pig’s head is flyblown and is allegorical in that it is decaying like society on the island. This scene is not illustrated in Peter Brooke’s version, but I ...

This is a preview of the whole essay