Antony And Cleopatra

Authors Avatar
Compare and contrast the way in which Roman values are presented in Act II Scene II and the way that Egyptian values begin to impinge upon the value of the Roman states and know how exactly other Romans fall under the spell

Act II Scene II is a rich piece of text, replete with oppositional imagery. We have the duty, honour and strategical strength of Rome pitted against the description of Cleopatra and the world of Egypt in a profligate hyperbolic manner.

From the very commencement of Act II Scene II we are met with the third Triumvir, Lepidus, who is neither gallant like Antony nor politically judicious like Caesar. He lacks the power and command of his fellow triumvirs, he vainly tries to maintain a balance of power by keeping Caesar and Antony on amiable terms. He attempts to enlist the support of Enobarbus, Antony's trusted friend. The language Lepidus uses is far from authoritative even though he is a Triumvir, "Good Enobarbus, 'tis a worthy deed, and shall become you well, to entreat your captain, to soft and gentle speech." However Enobarbus replies that he will "entreat him / To answer like himself." Here we are met with the opposition of authority within the Romans.

Lepidus' opening speech shows that he is, indeed, a meek, mild- mannered man who attempts to please and offend no one. He tells the other Triumvirs, "That which combined us was most great, and let not / A leaner action rend us,"... "for I earnestly beseech, touch you the sourest points with sweetest terms, nor curstness grow to the matter."

Throughout this scene Lepidus is shown to have the least lines, in the opening of this scene Enobarbus has more lines than Lepidus which tell us as an audience of the structure of the play. Enobarbus might be socially beneath Lepidus however he is more politically astute than his counterpart.

The conversation and language used between Caesar and Antony tells us of the two personalities in great depth. The meeting and conflict between Antony and Caesar is entirely Shakespeare's own creation, for it was not reported in Thomas North's translation of Plutarch. The scene is important for it reveals more information about both men.

From the very beginning we are met with the clash of power within the two protagonists, Caesar says, " Sit," Antony replies with, " Sit sir," Caesar replies, " Nay then." Here the language is short and severe, telling us of the growing antagonism between the two triumvirs. Also it highlights the fact that even though Caesar is the , "the prepubescent boy," he is marked as an equal to Antony. For he orders Antony to sit down first.
Join now!


Caesar is thoroughly accusing within this scene, whereas Antony is proving himself to be self-confident and able to handle Caesar's many grievances against him. The idea of Caesar of being accusing is gathered from the alliteration of the word, "you,"... "myself offended, and with you,"... "Once name you derogately, when to sound your name." Caesar is both a menacing adversary to Antony and a rigid representation of Roman law and order. In Act II Scene II he seems bent, rather ruthlessly on destroying Antony in front of his men. Caesar is depicted in a less positive light than ...

This is a preview of the whole essay