• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

By comparing and contrasting the dramatic presentation of Act 3 Scene 2 in the 1953 film version with Shakespeare's text, consider the different ways Brutus and Antony seek to control the crowd

Extracts from this document...


By comparing and contrasting the dramatic presentation of Act 3 Scene 2 in the 1953 film version with Shakespeare's text, consider the different ways Brutus and Antony seek to control the crowd: Julius Caesar was written in 1599 by William Shakespeare (1564-1616). The play is both a history and tragedy. It was based on Sir Thomas North's translation of Plutarch's lives. Julius Caesar has the tell-tale features of a history and tragedy, such as it being very much based on one leader figure (Julius Caesar) and having rousing speeches, similar to Shakespeare's 'Henry V' (St. Crsipin's Day speech). It also includes a battle, although everything is 'restored' at the end, similar to 'Macbeth'. Brutus and Antony's speeches are a key element in Julius Caesar. They are rousing speeches, as mentioned earlier - and very well written. The techniques used by both characters are distinctly different; they employ a variety of tactics, which can be interpreted in various ways. Within this essay, I will be analysing the 1953 film version of the play, directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz. Brutus and Antony are both seeking to control the citizens of Rome. Brutus needs the crowd to support him and believe he killed Julius Caesar for 'the good of Rome', otherwise there would be chaos and the citizens would revenge the conspirators. Antony wants the crowd to support him because he was a faithful friend of Caesar's and decides to avenge him by stirring the crowd into a mutiny against Brutus and the conspirators. In the confusion of the aftermath of Caesar's death, it is decided that Marcus Brutus will speak at his funeral; the main reason being his reputation as an honourable and noble senator. This was also the reason he was led to be a conspirator in the first place. He was needed in the murder plot from the beginning on account of his nobility. ...read more.


As Antony aims to build up the crowd's trust gradually, his first point is to make clear he comes to 'bury Caesar, not to praise him' (L.71). The word 'bury' makes it sound as though he wants nothing more than a dignified funeral for Caesar. He makes no implications that he wants to do anything else at this point. The first time Antony compliments Brutus as 'noble' (L.74) he sounds sincere, but he also manages to unsettle Brutus' firm accusations of Caesar being ambitious by saying 'if it were so' (L.76) The 'if' implies that Brutus could be wrong in calling Caesar ambitious. By repeating 'grievous', Antony strikes a balance between Caesar's crime of being ambitious, and the price with which he 'answered it' (L.77) i.e. death. Therefore he is neither for nor against what Brutus has said at this point; he is merely stating fact. Which will help to gain the crowd's trust. Marlon Brando uses the 'hand over heart' gesture in the film when he mentions Caesar was 'ambitious' so it seems he is showing that he doesn't agree with this claim at all. Antony flatters Brutus and the conspirators by calling them 'honourable' (L.79) By using repetition of 'all', he makes what he is saying sound earnest and genuine. Just the fact that he repeats it so many times makes it sound sarcastic, yet technically Brutus hasn't said anything against the conspirators. This is a clever tactic, as the repetition makes it clear that the conspirators were not honourable at all. Just this one word is enough to mock Brutus, although Antony claims he speaks not to 'disprove what Brutus spoke' (L.97) Obviously this is ironic, as this is exactly what he is doing! Unlike Brutus, who made outright claims against Caesar, Antony uses examples as evidence, which cannot be argued against, especially as they are things the crowd has witnessed, 'thrice presented him a kingly crown' (L.93) ...read more.


Whether or not there really were seventy-five drachmas for each person we don't know. Brutus didn't have anything to use, such as the body or the will. He could only talk about Caesar's death and his own reputation of being 'honourable'. I also noticed that Brutus didn't use any personal touches in his speech, so the crowd probably didn't have anything to relate to. Ironically, he called them his 'friends' but he didn't really speak with the crowd on a personal level, as Antony did. Neither did he insult or belittle Antony at all; he only encouraged the crowd to listen to him. He obviously didn't know what Antony was going to do - whereas Antony had the advantage of having the time to plan what he was going to say after he had heard Brutus. He knew just how to manipulate the crowd, one of his best tactics being the use of the word 'honourable'. In my opinion, Brutus is the hero of the play. He is certainly the tragic hero - his mistakes in the play definitely affected its course, such as it being his fault Antony was kept alive in the first place: 'let us be sacrificers, but not butchers' (2:1:166) It was also through his misjudgement that Antony got to speak at the funeral - Brutus trusted him too much: 'you shall not in your funeral speech blame us' (3:1:245) Ironic as this is exactly what he did. I think he is the hero because his mistakes lead to his downfall, though the words Antony says at the end of the play 'restore' everything at the end such as: 'this was the noblest Roman of them all' (5:5:68) Also, it is the fact that he genuinely thinks is doing the right thing to kill Caesar. The other conspirators were more interested in plotting the murder, but Brutus did manage to do something for the good of Rome. Ultimately, he was an honourable man; his only flaw his pride and tendency to be too trusting. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Who is the real hero of ‘Julius Caesar’?

    Continues: Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, That he is grown so great? Age, thou art shamed! Rome, thou hast lost the breed of noble bloods! When went there by an age, since the great flood, But it was famed with more than with one man?

  2. To what extent do you sympathise with Brutus?

    They started to shout things such as - 'We'll burn the house of Brutus!' 'Most noble Caesar, we'll revenge his death' and '[Of the conspirators] they were villains, murderers'.

  1. Julius Caersar - Analysis of Brutus

    Marcus Brutus had a very important role in the conspiracy against Caesar. He was the "back-bone" of the plan. According to Cassius, Brutus' main purpose in the conspiracy is for an insurance policy. The people will think, since Brutus is noble to Caesar, that there is a good reason for Caesar's assassination.

  2. Comparison of the Speeches made by Brutus and Antony in the Marketplace

    I say this because it seems as if Brutus sees himself as something more than a man. Throughout Caesar' dialogue, Caesar preferred not to say 'I' and instead referred to himself as 'Caesar'. During Brutus' speech, Brutus does exactly the same; he refers to himself with his own name: "...If

  1. 'Julius Caesar'- Shakespeare

    and causes the crowd to think about how they lost such a great man. " He hath brought many captives home to Rome, Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?" (Act 3 scene 3, lines86-88)

  2. Compare and contrast the speeches made by Brutus and Antony over the body of ...

    It is worth saying that the crowd are like a flock of sheep, and can easily be swayed. Proof of this is at the beginning of the play, when at one moment they support Pompey, and the next Caesar. More recently though, after Brutus' speech, the first citizen claims "This

  1. Why is Mark Antony more successful than Brutus in winning over the crowd at ...

    the Plebeians - either because Brutus would interrupt, or because the Romans' respect for Brutus would stand strong, and remain unmoved as his presence would still electrify the crowd. It is evident that the crowd's attention immediately diverts to Antony as Brutus leaves, and that their focus is on him

  2. Why is Anthony more successful than Brutus in winning over the crowd at Caesars ...

    Anthony also says to the crowd that the people that have killed noble Caesar are honourable men and what grief's they would have is not know to him that made them do what they did. This makes the conspirators look selfish who only think bout themselves and no one else.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work