• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the presentation of three pilgrims from Chaucer's General Prologue' and show how their descriptions add to our understanding of his society

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the presentation of three pilgrims from Chaucer's General Prologue' and show how their descriptions add to our understanding of his society 'The Canterbury Tales' is a group of tales written by Geoffrey Chaucer in about 1387. Chaucer planned to write 24 tales but died before he could complete them, so, The Canterbury Tales consist of 22 verse tales and two long prose tales. The 'General Prologue' gives a brief but vivid description of each pilgrim journeying to Canterbury before the pilgrims actually begin telling their tales. Most literature written in the medieval period was written in either French or Latin, especially poems or Holy Scriptures, so when Chaucer wrote 'The Canterbury Tales' in Middle English he was making a statement. Chaucer wanted to promote the vernacular language of England and so wrote 'The Canterbury Tales' in Middle English. Three of the best portraits of the pilgrims in the 'General Prologue' are of the Knight, the Wife of Bath and the Monk who all tell us a great deal about Chaucer's society. The Knight is a "verray, parfit, gentil knyght", who earns his living by fighting for his faith and his king. ...read more.

Middle

The five husbands could suggest that the Wife of Bath was an early feminist because she uses men to her own advantage and in her tale she claims women's superiority over men. Chaucer gently mocks the gregarious Wife of Bath by telling the reader in an exaggerated manner that on Sunday at Church the wimple that she wore "weyeden ten pound", this also hints at her materialistic and vain nature, which is completely opposite to the Knight. The Wife of Bath had clothes such as; "hosen of fyn scarlet reed Ful streite yteyd and shoes ful moyste and new" That show that she is vain and materialistic because she has bought new shoes for a pilgrimage and red stockings which would be very expensive because to dye clothes bright colours was very expensive in those days. The Knight, however, "Of fustian he wered a gypon/Al bismotered with his habergeon" which is completely the opposite. The Monk is "a lord ful fat and in good poynt"; he is indulgent; the fact that The Monk likes to eat swan also suggests that he is indulgent, not what a monk should be. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Knight she is on the pilgrimage for materialistic reasons whereas the Knight, like the Parson, is on the pilgrimage for authentic religious reasons. The Monk could be on the pilgrimage to socialise or it could be a reason to get out of the cloistered of the monastery; neither of which are holy reasons. In conclusion I believe that the Knight is the only person, along with the Parson, who is on the pilgrimage for the right reasons. The Knight is on the pilgrimage to give thanks to God and he dedicates his time to those who are in need. On the other hand The Monk is on the pilgrimage for one of two reasons, either to socialise with other people or just to get out of the monastery. This reflects the view at the time that the Church was corrupt and rich. The Wife of Bath is on the pilgrimage for vain and materialistic reasons the most likely reasons are either to show off her wealth or to find another husband. This reflects the position of women because could not go out and live on their own they needed the support of a husband or a father. Peter Redmond 4AC 4E3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    I am going to compare and contrast two stories the first 'The Fury' and ...

    3 star(s)

    She's sarcastic and attractive 'I was the one that fell for her sharp tits and long legs' and she like Mrs Fletcher will argue as she is strong and independent and she shows this when she leaves her husband and won't accept being hit.

  2. How do the Canterbury Tales explore the idea of gender? Discuss with reference to ...

    She holds her own opinions on selected texts and will argue her cause. Alisoun rejects her chastity by engaging in an erratic relationship with Nicholas, and making a mockery out of her husband shows her to have a lot in common with one of Jankyn's Wikked Wyves.

  1. What are the arguments of the Wife of Bath in relation to marriage? How ...

    Besides the argument about age and outlook, we can find other examples of similar views between the Prologue and the Tale that helps to bring them into a coherent whole. Take nobility as an example - From the Old Wife's view, people with noble names - possesses wealth and blood which "claime [them] to [be] of heigh parage" (line 1126)

  2. Carnival and Pilgrimage in The Canterbury Tales

    Noses and mouth, Bakhtin tells us, dominated the medieval popular image of the body, whereas in modern times expressive features like the eyes dominate; even with the Lady Prioress the nose is mentioned first. We are drawn up to their skin and facial hair--the white skin of the Friar's neck,

  1. Compare and contrast the presentation of three pilgrims from Chaucer's 'General Prologue' and show ...

    The Wife of Bath lives "biside Bathe" and she likes to weave, she has been married five times and she gives advice to people in love. She is a vain and materialistic unlike the knight. She had "And thries hadde she been at Jerusalem", which suggests that she is a holy woman who has been on a lot of pilgrimages.

  2. General Notes on Chaucer and the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales

    with a chilling description of the Plague (Boccaccio, First Day ), which provides the impetus for the journey in which the tales are told. The Preface defines an audience somewhat different from Chaucer's, as does the Conclusion, which includes a defense of broad speech and indecorous stories somewhat similar to that which Chaucer offers in the General Prologue.

  1. Taking together the portrait of the Miller in the 'General Prologue' with the framing ...

    The detailed description accounted by Chaucer provides the reader with a clear visual image of the Miller, allowing his character to become more realistic. Specific physical qualities of the Miller, such as the wart on the end of his nose crowned by hairs, provoke elements of humour for the reader,

  2. The Canterbury Tales is more than a collection of stories, many of them taken ...

    In The Miller's Tale, the parish clerk, Absolon, gets the worst of it, not because he goes after a married woman but because he acts against the values he supposedly upholds as a member of the Church hierarchy (RT 3102).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work