• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the presentation of three pilgrims from Chaucer's General Prologue' and show how their descriptions add to our understanding of his society

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the presentation of three pilgrims from Chaucer's General Prologue' and show how their descriptions add to our understanding of his society 'The Canterbury Tales' is a group of tales written by Geoffrey Chaucer in about 1387. Chaucer planned to write 24 tales but died before he could complete them, so, The Canterbury Tales consist of 22 verse tales and two long prose tales. The 'General Prologue' gives a brief but vivid description of each pilgrim journeying to Canterbury before the pilgrims actually begin telling their tales. Most literature written in the medieval period was written in either French or Latin, especially poems or Holy Scriptures, so when Chaucer wrote 'The Canterbury Tales' in Middle English he was making a statement. Chaucer wanted to promote the vernacular language of England and so wrote 'The Canterbury Tales' in Middle English. Three of the best portraits of the pilgrims in the 'General Prologue' are of the Knight, the Wife of Bath and the Monk who all tell us a great deal about Chaucer's society. The Knight is a "verray, parfit, gentil knyght", who earns his living by fighting for his faith and his king. ...read more.

Middle

The five husbands could suggest that the Wife of Bath was an early feminist because she uses men to her own advantage and in her tale she claims women's superiority over men. Chaucer gently mocks the gregarious Wife of Bath by telling the reader in an exaggerated manner that on Sunday at Church the wimple that she wore "weyeden ten pound", this also hints at her materialistic and vain nature, which is completely opposite to the Knight. The Wife of Bath had clothes such as; "hosen of fyn scarlet reed Ful streite yteyd and shoes ful moyste and new" That show that she is vain and materialistic because she has bought new shoes for a pilgrimage and red stockings which would be very expensive because to dye clothes bright colours was very expensive in those days. The Knight, however, "Of fustian he wered a gypon/Al bismotered with his habergeon" which is completely the opposite. The Monk is "a lord ful fat and in good poynt"; he is indulgent; the fact that The Monk likes to eat swan also suggests that he is indulgent, not what a monk should be. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Knight she is on the pilgrimage for materialistic reasons whereas the Knight, like the Parson, is on the pilgrimage for authentic religious reasons. The Monk could be on the pilgrimage to socialise or it could be a reason to get out of the cloistered of the monastery; neither of which are holy reasons. In conclusion I believe that the Knight is the only person, along with the Parson, who is on the pilgrimage for the right reasons. The Knight is on the pilgrimage to give thanks to God and he dedicates his time to those who are in need. On the other hand The Monk is on the pilgrimage for one of two reasons, either to socialise with other people or just to get out of the monastery. This reflects the view at the time that the Church was corrupt and rich. The Wife of Bath is on the pilgrimage for vain and materialistic reasons the most likely reasons are either to show off her wealth or to find another husband. This reflects the position of women because could not go out and live on their own they needed the support of a husband or a father. Peter Redmond 4AC 4E3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    I am going to compare and contrast two stories the first 'The Fury' and ...

    3 star(s)

    She's sarcastic and attractive 'I was the one that fell for her sharp tits and long legs' and she like Mrs Fletcher will argue as she is strong and independent and she shows this when she leaves her husband and won't accept being hit.

  2. Compare and Contrast Chaucer’s Presentation of the Monk and the Pardoner

    give up all material possessions and live a life of near poverty, however the Monk does not seem to have obeyed this rule, "with gris, and that the fineste of a lond And, for festne his hood under his chin He hadde of gold ywroght a ful curious pin; This

  1. General Notes on Chaucer and the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales

    She koude muchel of wandrynge by the weye. (General Prologue, I.464-67). Pilgrimages began as exercises in penance, as defined in The Parson's Tale: Commune penaunce is that preestes enjoynen men communly in certeyn caas, as for to goon peraventure naked in pilgrimages, or barefoot.

  2. Taking together the portrait of the Miller in the 'General Prologue' with the framing ...

    The Miller responds by pulling the Reeve's leg, as he says "Who hath no wyf, he is no cokewold...That knowestow wel thyself, but if thou madde". In ironically implying that most women are faithful, the Miller casts doubt on the Reeve's marriage, whilst providing no obvious cause for offence.

  1. What are the arguments of the Wife of Bath in relation to marriage? How ...

    necessarily worth claiming true nobility unless they live virtuously - it adds information to Chaucer's definition of nobility. One of the most distinctive examples of the similarity between the Prologue and the Tale is the "sovereinetee" (line 1044) that both the Wife of Bath and the Old Wife use to "wel over [their] [husbands] as [their] love" (line 1045).

  2. In this essay I am examining the three short stories "Turned" written by Charlotte ...

    They wanted to get rid of from each other. But they could not, due to impractical traditions and values of that time. Mr Bodman decides to kill his wife without any doubt to the society. To implement his plan he told her that he is going for Switzerland for one month.

  1. How do the Canterbury Tales explore the idea of gender? Discuss with reference to ...

    His reward for his submissiveness is that his elfin wife gains youth, beauty and faithfulness; this argument although seemingly unrealistic like the similar misread arguments proffered in The Wife of Bath's Prologue, incites a challenge to patriarchy. As discussed earlier, The Miller's Prologue and Tale are fabliaux, coarse and comic

  2. How do the Canterbury Tales represent female desires?

    Could this be a hint to her using whatever means possible for her monetary gain? Her fourth was a cheater, she may be many things but Alisoun is not an adulterer. She 'fries him in his own grease' making him as jealous of her as she is of him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work