• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare Shakespeare's presentation of the characters Brutus and Mark Antony. Julius Caesar was written in 1599, a time in which the monarchy was in power in Britain

Extracts from this document...


Compare Shakespeare's presentation of the characters Brutus and Mark Antony. Julius Caesar was written in 1599, a time in which the monarchy was in power in Britain. Shakespeare would have to be very careful what to put in his plays; he had to stay in favour of the royalty. If for example, Brutus was portrayed as the overall hero for procuring the safety of Rome through the assassination of someone who was going to rule Rome as a monarchist, Shakespeare would have been in trouble. Therefore, he had to ensure that this assassination was seen as unnatural, something that unsettled the natural order of things. For this reason, he made the night before the assassinations one of strangeness and peculiarity: " Men, all in fire, walk up and down the streets. And yesterday the bird o night did sit Even at noon-day upon the market place, Hooting and shrieking when these prodigies Do so conjointly meet let not men say 'These are their reasons, they are natural' For I believe they are portentous things Unto the climate that they point upon." -Casca Shakespeare had also intended his portrayal of leadership to capture the audiences attention as England herself was having leadership issues at that period of time. Queen Elizabeth was old and she didn't have an heir. He links this in a way as the Julius Caesar depicted in the play also doesn't have an heir. His wife was shown as having conceivement problems. ...read more.


Again using the example of Act 3, Scene 1, Mark Antony appeals directly to Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar's funeral by directing Brutus' attention to providing reasons for Caesar's death, to which he knows full well that Brutus will be the one who answers. Mark Antony does this as he is able to see that out of them all, Brutus' naivet� and unconsciousness of underlying political meanings would be an trait to play on. He sees that Cassius would see through his ploy but Brutus wouldn't. Brutus wanted Caesar to have "all true rites and lawful ceremonies." Comparing the inner selves of the two men through looking at the ways they treat people, Brutus is kind and caring, while Antony, cruel and manipulative. Examples depicting this would be Brutus asking his servants and guards to rest in his personal quarters ("call Claudio ad some other of my men, I'll have them sleep on the cushions of my tent"), - Brutus and Antony purely and simply using Lepidus as someone to do his dirty work- ( [My horse] is a creature that I teach to fight, To wind, to stop, to run directly on, His corporal motion governed by my spirit; And in some taste is Lepidus but so.) -Mark Anthony A direct contrast of Brutus and Mark Antony can be made as Brutus refuses to kill Mark Antony along with Julius Caesar even as Cassius almost predicts the future by saying that Antony is a "shrewd contriver". ...read more.


We can be certain that Brutus did love Caesar; but as for Antony, it can be said that he did indeed like Caesar. We can't however, be sure about his intentions where Caesar was concerned when he was alive. If the presentations of the characters are taken at face value, Mark Antony can be seen as the 'villain' and Brutus, the 'tragic hero'. However, one of Shakespeare's themes is the relativity of goodness. Brutus assassinated Caesar allegedly for the 'good of Rome'. And Brutus himself did believe in this a 100%. But nevertheless, this was betrayal. Caesar fell at his stab with the words: "Et tu Brute?- Then fall Caesar!". Caesar said it perfectly. A friend whom he had trusted, completely and totally, was stabbing him. And this is perhaps, the most tragic thing of all. Mark Antony apparent stance is perfectly paraphrased by E.M Forster: "If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend, I hope I should have the guts to betray my country." But, this view seems rather selfish. To be loyal to one friend, causing the downfall of the entire country seems to be almost securing your own future by compensating it with others. And yet, admiration can't be not shown as Mark's Antony unwavering loyalty to Caesar is portrayed. Then again, admiration can't not be shown as Brutus places nation before self. Both stances require equal amounts of courage. Courage to betray your friend, and courage again, to betray your country. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Compare and contrast the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus. Which is the most ...

    While Brutus based his speech on delivery alone, Antony bases his on delivery, but also a good use of repetition, and rhetorics to make his speech more effective than Brutus'. While Antony pauses to 'compose himself', the crowd is discussing what he has said but when Brutus had paused the crowd said nothing.

  2. Compare and Contrast - Cassius and Brutus from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    weak, this is how Shakespeare wanted Cassius to be portrayed at his death. Brutus dies the honourable Roman death, for the same reason (the realization of defeat), he gets his servant Strato to hold out his sword for him to run in to.

  1. Who is the real hero of ‘Julius Caesar’?

    When could they say till now, that talk'd of Rome, That her wide walls encompass'd but one man? Now is it Rome indeed and room enough, When there is in it but one only man. Also in actI sc3 we can confirm his jelousy: And why should Caesar be a tyrant then?

  2. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    "If you have tears prepare to shed them now." Ironically Antony then remarks where Brutus stabbed Caesar "Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed" this is ironic because he did not see the killing of Antony, yet the plebeians do not realise it.

  1. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    beginning of Antony repeatedly calling Brutus and the conspirators 'honourable' and noble, that by the end, it has become so sarcastic that no one believes it. Also by calling him noble, he is able to keep the crowds onside so that they will continue to listen to him.

  2. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    He was driven by his emotions so therefore he is going to whole heartedly persuade the crowd into his way of thinking, to avenge the death of Julius Caesar and cause a riot against the conspirators. Brutus' task is to calm the crowd and to persuade them that he had

  1. How suitably is the theme of the supernatural depicted in the play 'Julius Caesar'?

    Casca reveals to Brutus that Caesar may be feeling to powerful and ambitious. The Soothsayer comes to Caesar again, "shriller than all the music", " Beware the ides of March" and he is ignored again. "Shake off their sterile curse"(Act1Scene2), Calpurnia has no children and so to take off the

  2. Examine all the soliloquies spoken by Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony.

    But, just as Caesar said before his murder, "Unshak'd of motion: and that I am he, Let me a little show it, even in this, That I was constant Cimber should be banish'd And constant do remain to keep him so."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work