• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare two pieces of text called: 'It's a crying shame' and 'Sorry, but I think dying people are more important than dumb animals,' by an Animal Rights Group and Polly Toynbee respectively.

Extracts from this document...


I am going to compare two pieces of text called: 'It's a crying shame' and 'Sorry, but I think dying people are more important than dumb animals,' by an Animal Rights Group and Polly Toynbee respectively. The first article is intended to appeal to a younger audience who think that killing animals is wrong because they are cute etc. The second extract is aimed at adults who are interested in the welfare of human beings. The Animal Aid leaflet is persuasive as it is trying to pledge donations to stop animal experiments. The newspaper article is informative and persuasive by saying that killing an animal to save humans is good because would you rather die than an insignificant canine or rat. The Animal Rights leaflet is very eye catching. It has a colour image of a dog, which appears to be crying. The size of the text is varied form size 22 to 9 points and is in the font Arial which is an easier to read font than Times New Roman. ...read more.


People will instantly want to read this leaflet because of the expression on the dog's face. On the back of the leaflet there is picture of a mouse with some sort of growth coming off its side, I suspect that this is a tumour of some sorts. Personally I don't find this disturbing but a vast majority of the public will do and will never want that to happen again so they will want to pledge money to help stop animal experimentation. There is another picture of a monkey of some sorts and it appears to be very sad as if it has been tortured etc. I think the choice of pictures on this leaflet is rather good and will help put the point across to the reader. The newspaper articles picture is very plain and boring. It is just a picture of Poly Toynbee in black and white, and I think that she looks rather stern. I think this picture is just there to let you know who actually wrote the article. ...read more.


They want members of the public to feel the same that they do towards animal experimentation, and also want them to campaign against it as they think it is wrong. Poly Toynbee's article uses mainly very blunt and to the point language. She also uses real life facts and statistics: 'only 5 per cent of medical research uses animals.' And 'Maybe because only 7 per cent of the population is vegetarian, so an out-and-out vegetarian war wouldn't catch the public imagination.' This proves points very well and gets it to the reader plainly and simply. As before she is trying to get the reader to approve of her opinions and to simply really care about human welfare. Overall, I agree with Poly Toynbee's argument. Personally, I would much rather survive than a canine or rat. Human life is one of the most important factors in this millennia's time frame and as the world is ultimately going to be destroyed we should inhabit it as long as humanly possible, no matter what the cost... Zetta Hayden GCSE English Language Coursework 2004 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Animal Farm section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Animal Farm essays

  1. An analysis of Eric Arthur Blairs writing

    There is a kind of tension in Animal Farm between the sad story the author has to tell and the lucid, almost light way he tells it. This is very ironic, because the content of the story is very different from the style.

  2. Animal Experimentation

    Millions of pounds are spent each year by scientists who perform outdated and inaccurate tests. These tests are proven to be of no benefit to man or animals. This money would be better spent on our health service i.e. hospitals or education or even on the world crisis such as the tsunami relief or world famine.

  1. The Inuit People

    permanent communities and live in animal- skin tents at favourite spots for seal hunting, for fishing, or for collecting birds, eggs, and plants. The igloo (from an Eskimo word meaning "home") was constructed of packed snow and used only during the winter, villages of igloos were built on the firm

  2. Animal Rights

    It turns out that cancer research is especially sensitive to differences in physiology between humans and other animals. Many animals, particularly rats and mice, synthesize within their bodies approximately 100 times the recommended daily allowance for humans of vitamin C, which is believed to help the body ward off cancer.

  1. Animal Farm.

    Analysis This chapter illuminates Napoleon's corrupt and power-hungry motivations. He openly and unabashedly seizes power for himself, banishes Snowball with no justification, and shows a bald-faced willingness to rewrite history in order to further his own ends. Similarly, Stalin forced Trotsky from Russia and seized control of the country after Lenin's death.

  2. Animal Rights.

    They use six rabbits for each substance that they want to test. The technician places the substance into the lower eye of the rabbit, then the rabbits eyes are then examined at different times. The technician records signs of damage, such as redness, swelling, inflammation and clouding of the cornea.

  1. Animal Rights.

    It's just wrong to do something like that to the animals we came into existence from! We have been exploiting animals for so long now, that we simply continue doing so by habit alone. Animals are treated as things, and more specifically as property to people.

  2. Analysis of the Christian (or another religion) teachings to the ethical debate about animal ...

    But activists would do well to remember the influence of religion upon early legal considerations for animal welfare, as well as the first humane societies. These roots run deep. Today's animal rights movement has grown in part from Puritan legal codes of animal protection2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work