• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare two pieces of text called: 'It's a crying shame' and 'Sorry, but I think dying people are more important than dumb animals,' by an Animal Rights Group and Polly Toynbee respectively.

Extracts from this document...


I am going to compare two pieces of text called: 'It's a crying shame' and 'Sorry, but I think dying people are more important than dumb animals,' by an Animal Rights Group and Polly Toynbee respectively. The first article is intended to appeal to a younger audience who think that killing animals is wrong because they are cute etc. The second extract is aimed at adults who are interested in the welfare of human beings. The Animal Aid leaflet is persuasive as it is trying to pledge donations to stop animal experiments. The newspaper article is informative and persuasive by saying that killing an animal to save humans is good because would you rather die than an insignificant canine or rat. The Animal Rights leaflet is very eye catching. It has a colour image of a dog, which appears to be crying. The size of the text is varied form size 22 to 9 points and is in the font Arial which is an easier to read font than Times New Roman. ...read more.


People will instantly want to read this leaflet because of the expression on the dog's face. On the back of the leaflet there is picture of a mouse with some sort of growth coming off its side, I suspect that this is a tumour of some sorts. Personally I don't find this disturbing but a vast majority of the public will do and will never want that to happen again so they will want to pledge money to help stop animal experimentation. There is another picture of a monkey of some sorts and it appears to be very sad as if it has been tortured etc. I think the choice of pictures on this leaflet is rather good and will help put the point across to the reader. The newspaper articles picture is very plain and boring. It is just a picture of Poly Toynbee in black and white, and I think that she looks rather stern. I think this picture is just there to let you know who actually wrote the article. ...read more.


They want members of the public to feel the same that they do towards animal experimentation, and also want them to campaign against it as they think it is wrong. Poly Toynbee's article uses mainly very blunt and to the point language. She also uses real life facts and statistics: 'only 5 per cent of medical research uses animals.' And 'Maybe because only 7 per cent of the population is vegetarian, so an out-and-out vegetarian war wouldn't catch the public imagination.' This proves points very well and gets it to the reader plainly and simply. As before she is trying to get the reader to approve of her opinions and to simply really care about human welfare. Overall, I agree with Poly Toynbee's argument. Personally, I would much rather survive than a canine or rat. Human life is one of the most important factors in this millennia's time frame and as the world is ultimately going to be destroyed we should inhabit it as long as humanly possible, no matter what the cost... Zetta Hayden GCSE English Language Coursework 2004 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Animal Farm section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Animal Farm essays

  1. Animal Farm.

    literally rewriting the law on the side of the barn-no significant popular revolt among the working classes ever occurred. Similarly, the animals show no signs of rebellion. Minimus's poem provides compelling evidence for the animals' largely uncritical attitude toward the regime that oppresses it.

  2. Analysis of the Christian (or another religion) teachings to the ethical debate about animal ...

    Vegetarianism was first borne to America courtesy of British churchgoers3. What would become the RSPCA, the world's first animal welfare society, was founded on Christian principles and designed upon Christian lines. Additionally, the RSPCA/SPCA received some of its initial impetus from the first Jewish animal rights activist, Lewis Gompertz.

  1. Animal Experimentation

    Millions of pounds are spent each year by scientists who perform outdated and inaccurate tests. These tests are proven to be of no benefit to man or animals. This money would be better spent on our health service i.e. hospitals or education or even on the world crisis such as the tsunami relief or world famine.

  2. The Inuit People

    permanent communities and live in animal- skin tents at favourite spots for seal hunting, for fishing, or for collecting birds, eggs, and plants. The igloo (from an Eskimo word meaning "home") was constructed of packed snow and used only during the winter, villages of igloos were built on the firm

  1. Animal Rights

    For many years afterward, the tobacco industry was able to use these studies to delay government warnings and to discourage physicians from intervening in their patients' smoking habits. We all know now that this is totally untrue and that smoking is a large contributor to cancer.

  2. Animal Rights.

    Their are two tests that I would like to tell you about. One of the tests is called the Draize Eye-Irritancy Test. This was designed to measure how harmful a substance was to human eyes by using rabbits eyes. This test was developed in 1944 by the U.S Food and Drug Administration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work