• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

deliverance and disaster

Extracts from this document...


History GCSE coursework: assignment 1 The efficiency of sources may differ as some are more restricted, thus more inadequate than others. The utility can be scrutinized by exercising various analyses's and conditions. You have to consider the writer, status, motive and accuracy. On this basis I have started with a theory that the sources could be subjective as they were all written by British men. You can also note that all three sources give a different interpretation of what occurred. For example in source a, commander Thomas Kerr deems the lingering soldiers as useless and condemns their faith in the navy. Nevertheless, according to source C, there was a valiant and courageous sergeant who heroically took on eight Heinkels (planes). First of all, source A, in my opinion is very useful as it is an account from a high ranked commander of war. It must have some authenticity in it as Thomas Kerr is being extraordinarily negative of the army whereas he is being positive of the navy. ...read more.


This source is a primary one as it was written by a soldier who was present at the time, so in all likelihood, he would tell the truth. He also gives us a very first-rate outlook of the battle. His account has a much unbiased initiative of what happens; he portrays both British and Germans in positive light, hence enhancing its usefulness and believability. He informs us that, although the Germans took them to the boundaries it only spurred them on to greater heights and they certainly did not relinquish. Meanwhile, he also enlightens us concerning how the Germans were massacring the British armed forces. Albeit it is very constructive, in some places the source seems fabricated. The writer gives the intuition that the amount of planes and weaponry that the Germans beheld were minimal. He says 'a German fighter' which implies that there was only one German combatant perceptible. The are also some limitations in this source; Bill Elmsie was a seaman manning one of the boats, so it is implausible for him to have much understanding or credibility. ...read more.


None of the sources give us a date, when or where it was published nor do they enlighten us on the foundations of this epic battle which leads me to believe that they are incompetent. They also only comprise of British viewpoints, hence it would have been very accommodating to have French or German adaptations to collaborate what these sources are saying. Irrespective of whether the sources were authentic or not, they were all based on personal opinion rather than fact. In my opinion source A is without doubt the most useful as it told us about more of the battle than any of the others and due to the fact that it was written by a commander, who gave us a more realistic account and must have had more knowledge of the battle than the other authors. In contrast, I believe that source C was evidently the least useful, as it seems particularly fictional, it is severely limited and gives a much fantasised version of what really took place. ?? ?? ?? ?? By Abdul Wali 10RN ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    They were also very efficient; they were ready to take of at a moments notice. At the height of the battle, they would be fighting practically all day. Just landing for fuel and ammunition. They fought with real passion and determination and this was a very important factor concerning the British effort.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    It is aimed at a much younger audience therefore aimed at a generation that were not touched by the war. It creates a new impression of the battle of Britain, as a result of new findings and research. The interpretation is a piece of historical work for A-level students, so it should be balanced, and indeed it seems quite reliable.

  1. Battle of Britain.

    All of these interpretations reflect the moods of the people and therefore they are also afraid to upsetting people, seeing the time was so close to the war, especially to the people who got injured, pessimistic messages would be hurtful, and most importantly disrespectful for the families who lost their kids through this battle.

  2. War Poetry GCSE

    He states that 'We would not die in that mans company That fears his fellowship to die with us'. This is Henry's way of saying he doesn't want to be in the company of cowards if the time of death in battle would come and states 'Let him depart; his

  1. English Tennyson Coursework

    Charge for the guns! He said' the name isn't mentioned because Tennyson doesn't think that he deserved to be named as he had been the cause of the death or severe injury of 600 of England's greatest soldiers. 'Not though the soldiers knew someone had blundered' that someone was lord cardigan.

  2. The Crimean War.

    and the French were far too weak to defend Balaclava on their own,11 however Liprandi viewed the battle as over and won, they had possession of the high ground, and in their minds they had avenged their earlier defeat at Alma.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work