• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

deliverance and disaster

Extracts from this document...


History GCSE coursework: assignment 1 The efficiency of sources may differ as some are more restricted, thus more inadequate than others. The utility can be scrutinized by exercising various analyses's and conditions. You have to consider the writer, status, motive and accuracy. On this basis I have started with a theory that the sources could be subjective as they were all written by British men. You can also note that all three sources give a different interpretation of what occurred. For example in source a, commander Thomas Kerr deems the lingering soldiers as useless and condemns their faith in the navy. Nevertheless, according to source C, there was a valiant and courageous sergeant who heroically took on eight Heinkels (planes). First of all, source A, in my opinion is very useful as it is an account from a high ranked commander of war. It must have some authenticity in it as Thomas Kerr is being extraordinarily negative of the army whereas he is being positive of the navy. ...read more.


This source is a primary one as it was written by a soldier who was present at the time, so in all likelihood, he would tell the truth. He also gives us a very first-rate outlook of the battle. His account has a much unbiased initiative of what happens; he portrays both British and Germans in positive light, hence enhancing its usefulness and believability. He informs us that, although the Germans took them to the boundaries it only spurred them on to greater heights and they certainly did not relinquish. Meanwhile, he also enlightens us concerning how the Germans were massacring the British armed forces. Albeit it is very constructive, in some places the source seems fabricated. The writer gives the intuition that the amount of planes and weaponry that the Germans beheld were minimal. He says 'a German fighter' which implies that there was only one German combatant perceptible. The are also some limitations in this source; Bill Elmsie was a seaman manning one of the boats, so it is implausible for him to have much understanding or credibility. ...read more.


None of the sources give us a date, when or where it was published nor do they enlighten us on the foundations of this epic battle which leads me to believe that they are incompetent. They also only comprise of British viewpoints, hence it would have been very accommodating to have French or German adaptations to collaborate what these sources are saying. Irrespective of whether the sources were authentic or not, they were all based on personal opinion rather than fact. In my opinion source A is without doubt the most useful as it told us about more of the battle than any of the others and due to the fact that it was written by a commander, who gave us a more realistic account and must have had more knowledge of the battle than the other authors. In contrast, I believe that source C was evidently the least useful, as it seems particularly fictional, it is severely limited and gives a much fantasised version of what really took place. ?? ?? ?? ?? By Abdul Wali 10RN ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Britain on the other hand had a good chain of command, headed by the able and respected commander-in-chief, Air Marshal Dowding, and his second-in-command, Air Marshal Park. Dowding had previously designed the Spitfire and the Hurricane - the two Planes Britain was using in the Battle of Britain and had encouraged the development of Radar.

  2. War Poetry GCSE

    He describes war to be 'Obscene as cancer' a very deep subject which many people may be able to relate to as it describes mainly that u must face the fact that you probably will die as a result unless it is cured, in war terms the war coming to an end.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    because they left squadrons vulnerable to attack. They employed the looser and more flexible four-ship 'finger four' developed in the Spanish Civil War.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    The main reason for him to write this interpretation was because he was terribly injured and was trying to justify his injuries, and also he was trying to come to terms with what he had experienced. This was written at a time when the outcome of the war was not

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    Churchill probably guides the poster, because once again this poster reinforces Churchill's myth about 'the few'. The pilots look happy, proud, smiling and looking at the sky meaning they are looking to the future. This poster suggests that the Battle of Britain was a great victory.

  2. Battle of Britain.

    Because of this emotional content, it is very effective in reaching its audience and getting people to understand what the pilots went through. However one of its main weaknesses is the fact of personal aggrandisement and is glorifying himself, because he has been injured very badly, he wanted to say

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work