Discuss Chaucer's use of irony in the General Prologue of the Canterbury Tales.

Authors Avatar
Discuss Chaucer's use of irony in the General Prologue of the Canterbury Tales.

Chaucer uses three main comical techniques to portray those characters that he wishes to satirise. Few of the pilgrims are presented entirely by listing visual details, as in the case of the Yeoman; the main method, especially in satirical portraits, is to describe with enthusiasm and admiration all those features of which the victim himself is particularly proud. This task is made easier by the use of two different characterisations of 'Chaucer' - Chaucer the poet and Chaucer the pilgrim. While Chaucer himself may not respect or admire many of the characters' traits, Chaucer the pilgrim regularly praises his fellow travellers on traits which do not deserve to be praised and therefore the foolish pilgrims give themselves away.

An example of this method is during the portrait of the Monk, whose masculinity, fine horses, supple boots and diet are remarked on with approval by Chaucer. Again in the description of the Prioress this method is evident:

"Ful semely hir wimpel pinched was;"

And

"Ful fetis was hir cloke, as I was war",

Both admire the beautiful dress of the Prioress and earlier on in the portrait Chaucer goes into great detail on the subject of her table manners. Chaucer appears to be very impressed by her glamorous looks and the appearance of a romantic rapport, however this is hardly the effect you would expect a Prioress to have on men. So, by describing in great detail the characteristics that she is most proud of, Chaucer shows the Prioress up to be a lady more interested in he own appearance than in charity and obedience to her Holy Vows.
Join now!


The second technique used by Chaucer to satirise the pilgrims occurs when the Chaucer echoes the words of the pilgrim's most notably revealing statements. For example, with the Monk, lines 174-189 practically report a conversation in which the Monk gives himself away by complaining about the strictness of the old Rule of St Benedict. Yet as a monk he should have bound himself to keep these Rules by a religious vow. The pilgrim Chaucer draws further attention to the Monk's corruption by mentioning that he doesn't take part in daily study and manual labour, two of the monastic ...

This is a preview of the whole essay