A mysterious haunting is next established; a room in the house which has not been entered in many years, allegedly because of a spectre occupying it. The main character declares he wishes to investigate; the others stay seated. ‘If you go to the red room tonight… you go alone’ said the man with the withered arm. The old woman exclaims ‘Tonight of all nights’. This shows that the room must be very dangerous to venture in, especially on that specific night.
The Withered Arm, however, is very different from a typical ghost story. The atmosphere is very casual and calm, and unlike the previous two tales, the story is stretched over a time period of more that a year, whereas the others are very quick, one night in the Red Room. An average village day is being described, with everyone going about his or her daily tasks as usual. The story does not seem to be leading into a horror story. The characters (Rhoda Brook and her son) are situated in a dairy farm with 80 cows. There is general conversation taking place between them concerning the arrival of a young lady (Gertrude Lodge), who recently married her lover. Gertrude seems very tender and kind, with a young pretty face – ‘Her face as comely as a live doll’s’, apparently very innocent. Currently there is nothing that prepares the reader for anything even mildly horrific, with the exception of Rhoda’s forthcoming dream. She dreams of an ‘incubus’ ‘sitting upon her chest’, strangely resembling Gertrude. The ghost in this dream adds the essential feature that a gothic horror story must have. Rhoda attempts to prise Gertrude off her, leaving her with huge welts on her arm in the unmistakable shape of a hand. The story bases itself around this dream. This is quite different from the two previous stories, which strongly resemble components of gothic horror.
Part 2
The problem comes next. This involves how the stories unfold, the relation between the central characters, whether the story causes us to ponder on what is to come, and how the tension increases.
In the monkey’s paw, the main characters are the White family. The family seems very close to each other.
Mr White appears to be a man who is usually quite direct; he gets straight to the point, and avoids any misunderstanding (unless he is losing a game!). He seems rather nosey at times, and doesn’t listen to the opinions of others; he frequently believes he is right. Subsequently, he is somewhat naïve; he only looks at what is on the outside of something; he rarely considers the consequences of his actions beforehand.
Mrs White seems to be a very calm, attentive woman, quite the opposite of her husband. She doesn’t converse much, but when she does, she is very polite and subtle, but also quite curious and information seeking – ‘Monkey’s paw? … And did you really have the three wishes granted? … And has anybody else wished?’
Herbert White seems to be an average young man; he is relatively cheeky, and acts quite clever from time to time – ‘Well, why don’t you have three sir’. I suspect he nearly always has a reply to each remark.
The family interact fairly well with each other, though there is not much communication between them in the story.
When Sergeant Major Morris explains about the monkey’s paw, the reader begins to contemplate what is to come. He states that the first man had his three wishes, but his third was for death, implying that the consequences of the wishes were so awful, that death was the only solution. He also says that the paw has caused enough mischief already, and he no longer wanted it; he subsequently threw it into the fire, but Mr White dishes it out with haste, not realising that the soldier tried to destroy it for a reason. When Mr White asks for possession of the entity, the soldier refuses – ‘I wont … if you keep it, don’t blame me for what happens’. The tension increases here, as we consider what is to come later on.
In the red room, the narrator seems to be a very dependant man, who follows his own beliefs in situations, and seldom wavers. He is very straightforward, and does not believe in any sort of supernatural forces (e.g. Ghosts/ spirits). It seems he thinks rather highly of himself – ‘I can assure you that it will take a very tangible ghost to scare me’. He always has an answer; as the old man warns him, he rapidly acknowledges this. He appears to mock the three aged by stating the many ways he will prove them wrong concerning the red room – ‘If you will show me to this haunted room of yours, I will make myself comfortable there … I will relieve you from the task of entertaining me’.
The reactions towards the red room from the senior citizens is quite remarkable; it is as if anyone who dares to venture is not likely to come out alive, and endure the most horrifying demise. The old man with the withered arm frequently makes comments with regard to the man’s choice – ‘It’s your own choosing … It’s your own choosing … I said, it’s your own choosing … But if you go to the red room tonight, you go alone … It’s your own choosing’. More than once the old woman says – ‘This night of all nights’; implying that that particular night of all nights was especially dangerous. The old man with the terrible cough does not contribute much to the conversation; the only relevant thing he says is – ‘And are you really going’. This indicates that he does not really believe that the young man is genuinely going to risk the endeavour. These are all features of gothic horror. The disfigured people increase the tension, as they seem rather ghostly and subhuman.
In the Withered Arm, Rhoda Brook and her son are discussing Gertrude Lodge, and how Rhoda is planning to send her son to find out what she looks like – ‘You can give her a look, and tell me what she’s like’. From first impressions, I suspect Rhoda despises Gertrude, from the way she regards her with disgust – ‘If you do see her … and if she seems like a woman who has ever worked for a living, or one that has been always well off, and has never done anything, and shows marks of the lady on her, as I expect she do’. This may lead the reader to believe that Rhoda is planning to harm Gertrude in some way. In the beginning, there does not seem to be a problem present. Later on, Rhoda meets Gertrude, and befriends her due to the benevolence Gertrude shows to Rhoda’s son. This is rather ironic, as she had once despised the woman for supposedly stealing her husband. Rhoda next notices the handprint-like marks on Gertrude’s arm, as she did in the dream, leading the reader to believe that this dream could well have been a premonition. This is the first hint of supernatural behaviour in the story, and also questions the innocence of Rhoda. Gertrude seeks advice, and hence visits a conjurer to find a cure. As a friend, Rhoda is asked to accompany her. As in the Monkey’s Paw, Hardy uses the atmosphere and weather to create tension; the thought that evil will prevail on this occasion. Upon arrival at the conjurer, Gertrude is told with much tension ‘Tis the work of an enemy’. She looks into a cup of egg and water, at the face of her enemy… Rhoda. This is quite effective, but also rather predictable. Gertrude now believes Rhoda has supernatural powers.
Part 3
In this section I will be comparing how each story develops, and what in particular builds up the tension.
In The Monkey’s Paw, Mr White asks wishes for 200 pounds. Initially, the reader thinks - ‘how can 200 pounds hurt you’, as do the characters. Herbert White however does not believe they will receive 200 pounds – ‘Well, I don’t see the money, and I bet I never shall.’ Then Mrs White suggests that it may drop out of the sky onto his head. This begins to bring ideas into the reader’s head, as Sergeant Major Morris stated that things happened so naturally.
Later in the story, Herbert goes to work in a machinery factory. Whilst he is out, Mr and Mrs White are sitting down to a meal, when Mrs White notices a man hovering at the gate as if contemplating whether to enter. She invites him in; he has a very grim face. He tells the two adults that Herbert is very badly hurt, but not in any pain. The sinister meaning dawns upon the two; Herbert is dead. Next, he states that the company was willing to pay compensation of 200 pounds. This could easily be related to coincidence; there is a possibility that it could happen, another aspect of gothic horror. The couple are distraught, and begin grieving over the loss of their son.
In The Red Room, the narrator describes his feelings and reactions, as he walks down the long winding corridors towards the red room, then as he enters it. The first person narration describes his surroundings and how he interacts with them. He uses many similes and metaphors to describe the environment he is in. He is alone.
The initial passage is ‘draughty’ and ‘subterranean’, suggesting darkness. There are shadows everywhere – ‘A shadow came sweeping up after me, and one fled before me into the darkness overhead’. His surroundings make him rather edgy and vigilant – ‘A bronze group stood upon the landing, hidden from me by the corner of the wall, but its shadow fell … and gave me the impression of someone crouching to waylay me … with my hand in the pocket that held my revolver, I advanced, only to discover a Ganymede and Eagle glistening in the moonlight’. By the time he reaches the red room, he is already incredibly apprehensive. As he climbs the steps leading to the room, he remembers that his predecessor was found dead on these steps. He is uneasy about the likelihood of the same misfortune. He enters the room, to find it is red, the colour that is associated with, blood, evil, danger, and the Devil. The room is lit by seven candles, which is rather suspicious, considering no one had supposedly entered the room in many years. The narrator is not satisfied by the amount of light in the room, and proceeds to light another ten, but is shocked to see that one by one, the candles are put out, ‘as if the wicks had been suddenly nipped between a finger and thumb’. This is an very good example of personification. His fear is portrayed though his constant self-chatter, as though attempting to rebuild his courage via rhetorical questions – ‘Did I do that in a flash of absentmindedness?’ and ‘That draught’s a strong one!’ By noticing the narrator’s panic, the reader also becomes slightly panicked. This, as well as the narration being in first person also shows how well written the story is; being able to feel the narrator’s emotions through his words. As he continues to light and relight the candles, his fear is rapidly increasing. He visibly begins to panic, as his actions become more frequent and strong. He is eventually plunged in darkness, and in his fright screams, stumbles, and falls heavily, his head colliding profoundly with the floor. We do not know whether his is dead, or merely unconscious, and we are also left in awe of what was in the room at the same time as he was, if anything.
In The Withered Arm, Gertrude and Rhoda are also alone, but for different reasons. Rhoda is besieged with guilt, as she now also believes she subconsciously caused harm to Gertrude, out of pointless hatred. Her ‘face grew sadder and thinner’ through despair. Gertrude, however, is alone because of her arm. It is rapidly deteriorating, along with her usual warm-hearted image. Her husband soon discards her, turning her ‘into an irritable, superstitious woman’. Her seclusion turns her depressed and miserable, as she becomes more desperate to heal her arm. In a final attempt to restore her arm back to health, Gertrude turns to supernatural forces, knowing they are her only hope.
Part 4
This section focuses on the solutions found in each story. Unlike The Withered Arm and The Monkey’s Paw, The Red Room does not have a clear solution, as the narrator has been knocked out. The Monkey’s Paw and The Withered Arm, however, do.
In The Monkey’s Paw, it is Mrs White who finds the solution, although maybe not the best of ones – she wants to use another wish to bring Herbert back to life. Mr White wakes up in the dead of the night to find Mrs White sobbing to herself over her son. He soon returns to his sleep, only to be raised again by the shrieks of his wife – ‘The monkey’s paw! The monkey’s paw… Go down and get it quickly, and wish our boy alive again’ to which Mr White replies – ‘Good God, you are mad!’ They both stumble downstairs, but as Mr White reaches the doorway, he has this mental image of the talisman bringing before him the mutilated body of his dead son. He becomes bathed in cold sweat, and loses his coordination. He suddenly notices the change in his wife’s face as he enters the room; she looked ‘white and expectant’ and had an ‘unnatural look’ upon it. He realised he is afraid of her.
In The Withered Arm, Gertrude becomes more gripped by the supernatural, that she decides to return to the conjurer in a final attempt to heal her disfigured arm. He tells her – ‘you must touch with the limb the neck of a man who’s just been hanged. It will turn blood and change the constitution’. As in the Monkey’s Paw, Gertrude is not too enthusiastic about performing the repulsive task.
Part 5
In this section, I will show whether each story has a climax or an anti-climax, and show how they differ from each other.
In the Monkey’s Paw, the story reaches a climax near the end when Mr White becomes afraid of Mrs White’s hysterical behaviour as they leave the bedroom. She demands him to wish Herbert back from the dead in an unearthly voice, to which he declines. She repeats her command, and he obeys. They return to their bed in silence, when Mr White hears a hardly audible knock at the door. Terrified, he hurries into his room, ignoring the sound. Another knock comes, but this, time, Mrs White hears it. Mr White tries to pretend it was a rat, which had passed him in the hallway, but she seems to know it is Herbert. He tries to restrain her from going downstairs to open the door, both physically and verbally, yet neither seem to work – ‘For God’s sake don’t let it in’ As Mrs White struggles to reach the top bolt to open the door, Mr White is groping around on the floor in search of the paw he dropped. The door continued to knock. As he heard the bolt ease back, he found the talisman and ‘breathed his third and final wish’. The knocking ceased, the door opened, and a long wail of disappointment came from Mrs White’s lips. This is similar to a number of other classic horror stories, where the author makes the reader predict what is to come and then change it drastically; all the horror occurs in the head, unlike in some modern day tales where all the horror is in words on the page.
The Withered Arm also has a climax, but as the story is longer, it takes longer to reach. In the mean time, tension is built, as Gertrude watches the gallows being erected and the ropes being tightened. She is increasingly dreading the task she must perform, and is definitely having second thoughts. The executioner puts Gertrude’s hand on the neck of the recently hung man, and she cried – ‘The turn o’the blood’ just as the conjurer said would happen. Little did she know that the man was actually Rhoda and Lodge’s son until another shriek rang through the air – ‘rent the air of the enclosure… You are like her at last’, meaning she resembles the apparition Rhoda saw in her dream. Gertrude is horrified to see her husband and Rhoda Brook. As in Rhoda’s vision, she grabbed Gertrude by the arm and flung her to the side, leaving her unconscious in a crumpled heap. This was not a predictable end to the story, as the author gave added a twist to the end for effect. The end was very striking and different.
Conclusion
All three stories are different, yet they contain many similarities, for example, they all have features of gothic horror. My reason for this is because they were all written around the same era – late 19th Century. At the time when these stories were written, there was a very strong belief in supernatural powers, hence the stories all contained aspect concerned with the supernatural; darkness, and shadows. These are added for extra effect. Also, traces of the Victorians are evident in the language of each story, for example, in the Red Room, many references are made to ‘sconces bearing candles’. The difference between the Monkey’s Paw and the others was that an American wrote it; therefore his writing techniques would be different. The difference between the Withered Arm and the other two was that it was solely based upon witchcraft, whereas the remaining two were ghost stories. Each story used its own range of similes, metaphor, adjectives and personifications, but mostly the Red Room. As the story was in first person narration, every sentence needed a description, and the author made a very good job of transferring the emotions of the narrator from the page to the brain.
Bibliography
- An Introduction Susan Hill
- The Monkey’s Paw W.W.Jacobs
- The Red Room H.G.Wells
- The Withered Arm Thomas Hardy