• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Hamlet is primarily a personal rather than a political tragedy

Extracts from this document...


'Hamlet is primarily a personal rather than a political tragedy" Would an Elizabethan audience have agreed with this response to the play? As a member of the 21st century audience, is this how you respond to the play? Watching Hamlet, an Elizabethan audience would feel many resonances with their own world. England, like Denmark, was a troubled country with much drama surrounding its political situation. Therefore, an Elizabethan audience would probably have responded to Hamlet as essentially a political tragedy. Through studying the contextual background-surrounding Hamlet, we can understand their immediate response, however, with the gift of hindsight, the 21st century audience can see through the political aspect and analyse the personal one. Therefore, as a member of a 21st century audience, can see both sides that this argument proposes. Thus, posing a fundamental question to us: How far is Hamlet a personal tragedy, and how far is it a political one? More educated members of an Elizabethan audience may even have seen Hamlet as an attack on the monarchy and the worrying political situation in England. It is arguable that Shakespeare intended to use Hamlet to show his views without the possibility of being labelled treacherous. From the very beginning of the play even the most ignorant, unperceptive member of the audience would find it impossible to ignore the similarities between Denmark and their own Elizabethan England. ...read more.


Many critics have found in this balanced and careful piece of rhetoric evidence of Claudius' self-assurance and political competence, but Hamlet's opening speeches reject the language of impersonal ritual and insist on private feelings as the touchstone for behaviour. His first soliloquy Hamlet reveals the depth of his pain about his mother's hasty marriage. This unadulterated communication with the audience may have been intended by Shakespeare to create sympathy for Hamlet from the audience. We can learn from historical sources that in the Elizabethan period, Claudius' marriage would have been considered unlawful and incestuous by society. It is also a union forbidden in Leviticus XVIII. His objections also imply that Hamlet is a religious man which also would have been admired by the audience. However, we are also shown that he is aware that it is dangerous in the current climate to reveal his feelings: "But break my heart, for I mist hold my tongue" (Act I, scene ii, line 159.) This line can also be interpreted as the first sign of Hamlet's undying affection for his mother. Many critics follow this line of argument further and apply Freud's theory of the Oedipus complex to Hamlet's feelings for his mother (For example, Earnest Jones.) ...read more.


Another factor that must be taken into account is the associations with Hamlet's genre. It was a common theme with conventional tragedy that the events at the top of the social strata reflect on the entire state. This is emphasised in Act I, scene I, line 69 by Horatio "This bodes some strange eruption to our state." If the political aspect of Hamlet was insignificant, why would it by highlighted at the start of the play? In conclusion, the Elizabethan audience are less likely to have been as well informed or educated as a 21st century audience and therefore may not have been intelligent enough to analyse the relationships between the characters of the significance of the soliloquies. However, we can be sure that they could not ignore the fact that fictional Denmark almost perfectly mirrored their own Elizabethan England; thus supporting my argument that the Elizabethan audience were likely to have seen Hamlet as a political tragedy. Even from a 21st century perspective, the political aspect of the play cannot be ignored, particularly when we are educated of the historical time period in which its first audiences would have viewed it. However, as a member of a 21st century audience, contrasting with my conclusion of the Elizabethan response, my response is to interpret it as primarily a personal tragedy rather that a political one. Charlie Matthews 12 CAS 10/05/2007 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hamlet essays

  1. Hamlet & Madness

    it comes near the circumstance/ Which I have told thee of my father's death. / I prithee when thou seest that act afoot,/ Even with the very comment of my soul/ Observe my uncle. I his occulted guilt/ Do not unkennel in one speech/ It is a damn�d ghost we have seen, / And my imagination's are as foul..."(a.3.s.3L-60-77).

  2. 'Hamlet is primarily a personal rather than a political tragedy' - To what extent ...

    We are told by Marcellus and Horatio that Denmark is preparing for war so desperately that the shipwrights 'do not divide the Sunday from the week'. This would surprise the strictly Christian Elizabethan audience. This preparation for war is due to an expected military invasion by the Norwegian prince Fortinbras,

  1. In Act I what do we learn about the political and personal situation in ...

    Shakespeare had recently written Julius Caesar, and as such his audience would have been well aware of what it symbolised. It also symbolises unrest, the upset of not belonging to either this world or the next, that in fact it belongs nowhere.

  2. Compare the opening sections of Kenneth Branagh's and Franco Zeffirelli's film versions of Hamlet.

    The next few seconds introduces Horatio, Marcellus, Francisco and Bernardo. Their dialogue tells us about the ghost and what they have seen before, we get close-ups as they speak and we find out that Horatio does not believe that this ghost exists.

  1. Select two soliloquies from Hamlet and analyse their significance to the play as a ...

    However, the advantage that the audience have now is that they understand Hamlet's character and state of mind. After everything that Hamlet has had to suffer, he still refuses to blame Claudius for the death of his father, "The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" this shows that Hamlet believes that he is suffering the pain of ill fate.

  2. Hamlet has been portrayed as a man with a fatal flaw,a misfit in a ...

    Claudius is likened to a grotesque creature part human, part goat and symbolised as having a sexually promiscuous nature which conveys Hamlet's hatred towards him. While he denotes his father 'Hyperion', the titan god of light which represents honour and virtue.

  1. To what degree to do you consider Hamlet to be mad? How do you ...

    This does not indicate madness, but again shows that he is irrational, just that he is careless of the consequences. However, the scene with the ghost also reveals perhaps the beginning of Hamlet's 'illness'. Although Horatio and Marcellus see the ghost, it is only Hamlet that can hear him.

  2. Hamlet is a well-known tragedy written by William Shakespeare in the year 1600.

    He is here stating that he wishes his body would just melt away so he could be no more. It shows I think how much he loved his father if he does not want to live in a world without him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work