• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Animal testing necessary?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Is Animal Testing necessary? "A key question in science is not whether something can be done, but whether it should it be done."- Dr Maggy Jennings, Research Animals Department, RSPCA. The use of animals in research generates two key questions: Are animal experiments necessary and are they morally justified? These points are hotly debated, but there are no simple, black and white answers. The use of animals in experiments is one of the traditional approaches to finding out how human and animal bodies work (both when healthy and in times of illness or disease) and for testing products such as medicines and industrial chemicals. Scientists who use animals argue that there is no other way of achieving their scientific objectives, and that alternative methods, such as using computer models or cell cultures, will not provide the information they require. ...read more.


These viewpoints are reflected in UK law. Before granting a licence to carry out research using animals, the Home Office has to be satisfied that the harm caused to the animals is outweighed by the potential benefits of the project. This 'harm/benefit analysis' is part of ethical review. The Home Office also has to be satisfied that there are no non-animal alternatives available and that the number of animals used, and their suffering, is minimised. Apart from the scientists themselves, and the Home Office, there are other influences. For example, Regulatory bodies implementing the laws concerning the safety of medicines and chemicals may require testing on animals; major funders of research (such as the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust), and medical research charities, decide which experiments to fund; and Scientific journals can influence whether and how research is done as their editors decide what research is published. ...read more.


The serious ethical dilemmas involved demand that a wider range of perspectives is included in decision making. We just know that in the 21st century, we can now accomplish all of this without using animals. Recent advances in cell biology and biotechnology provide humans with incredible new opportunities to make great advances in fighting human diseases without using animals, which can often be poor models for how humans will respond to drug therapies. I vote for not torturing innocent animals and caging animals that belong in the wild and testing on prisoners with life sentences and those on death row. No matter how many "pain killers" they administer, animals don't understand what's going on, and they don't deserve to be tested on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Of Mice and Men - Loneliness

    In the same way, George shooting Lennie was also the kindest option available. Candy is devastated and lost without his dog, and this is when his loneliness really sets in. There is little future left for him, except misery and a life of being alone, and he tries valiantly to change this by buying into Lennie and George's dream.

  2. Should animal testing be banned?

    I believe that no one can say science is morally justifiable, especially if it is being used to create a weapon which one day, may harm that very person. Yet another argument people make to justify vivisection is that every major medical breakthrough in the past century is because of animal testing.

  1. Coursework B Animal Testing

    Also she argues that the HLS is corrupted and are undertaking brutal activities, evidence shown; 'extreme animal cruelty as well as serious breaches of the law' this tells us that they are getting away with crimes like 'staff repeatedly stabbing dogs with needles' this is extreme violence to animals, they treated unfairly.

  2. Arguments for and against Animal testing. I disagree with K. Archibalds opinion of banning ...

    As a result the experiment's results will be pointless. This could not only mislead researchers but even contribute to illnesses or deaths by failing to predict any toxic effect on drugs. As mentioned previously, most animals in laboratories are used for genetic manipulation, surgical intervention or injection of foreign substances.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work