• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Shakespeare wrote 'Julius Caesar' in such a way that it is difficult to say whether Caesar had tyrannical instincts or not.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shakespeare wrote 'Julius Caesar' in such a way that it is difficult to say whether Caesar had tyrannical instincts or not. Weigh the evidence provided in the play and give your considered opinion on this matter. Throughout Shakespeare's play Caesar demonstrates both tyrannical and non tyrannical instincts in such a way that it is difficult to reach a decision on whether Caesar wanted control of Rome or not. This made Brutus' choice to kill him hard to justify. In scene one Caesar gives both reason for being power hungry but also for not wanting the crown. In this scene Caesar is offered the crown three times by Mark Anthony. Each time he denied the crown more willingly. This suggests that he actually did want the crown to be laid upon his head. This can be supported in the way that Caesar and the crowd reacted. The crowd were very pleased that he denied the crown. This annoyed Caesar, possibly because he wanted the crown, and caused him to faint. In this way he displayed tyrannical instincts. On the other hand this scene could be viewed in an entirely different way. The fact that Caesar denied the crown three times albeit each time more unwillingly could be interpreted as Caesar not wanting power. ...read more.

Middle

In saying this Caesar is indicating that whatever circumstances that will affect him shall be dealt with last. This means that he is not worrying for himself but for what may be concern for others. In other words it seems as if Caesar is concerned with the fate of Rome, not himself. This behaviour is not typical of a tyrant and consequently gives evidence that Caesar did not have tyrannical instincts. Furthermore the speeches of other characters also provide evidence for Caesar having tyrannical instincts. Words from Cassius in act 1 scene 2 also help give evidence that Caesar looks upon himself as better than the people of Rome. ' Like a Collosus; and we petty men Walk under his huge legs, and peep about To find ourselves dishonourable graves' With this Cassius is saying how Caesar has become like collosus which was a huge statue and how the insignificant men wander beneath his legs searching for dishonourable graves. This means that he sees himself as better than ordinary men. In argument to this it can be said that when Cassius said this he was trying to persuade Brutus to help himself and the conspirators kill Caesar. On top of this Cassius also showed signs of jealousy towards Caesar. ...read more.

Conclusion

This can be viewed as strange as it wouldn't be the normal behaviour of a tyrant. However, it could also be argued that it wouldn't of mattered to Caesar what was in his will. By giving away money and his gardens doesn't mean that he wasn't a tyrant because it wouldn't of affected him as he would've been dead. The content of the will would have no affected on Caesar's hold on Rome. It is possible that the will could have been a way to enhance his image and popularity after his death. It can be seen that throughout much of the first half of the play Caesar himself and other characters give evidence of how he shows tyrannical and non tyrannical instincts. Despite the fact that Caesar does display non tyrannical instincts I think that the evidence for him being tyrannical far outweighs the evidence against. I think that the scene where Caesar denies the crown three times and then faints is one of the best examples of how he wanted the crown. The way in which he was constantly building himself up as a better person than everyone else also shows me his tyrannical instincts. Consequently I think they Brutus' decision was right and that Caesar had tyrannical instincts which demonstrated in the play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gender Transformation of Caesar

    5 star(s)

    strong figure is accessible and needs the support of the fickle masses. Show you sweet Caesar's wounds, poor poor dumb mouths, And bid them speak for me. But were I Brutus, and Brutus Antony, there were an Antony Would ruffle up your spirits, and put a tongue In every wound

  2. If Caesar had lived, would he have become a tyrant?

    We are told that Caesar was offered the crown. Not once, nor twice, but three times. This is an important moment in the play. It makes the reader wonder whether Caesar really is ambitious as Cassius has made out he is just a few moments earlier. This could make Cassius re-think his ideas about Caesar but it does not.

  1. What is Julius Caesar like?

    First, he says how fearsome he is. "Caesar shall go forth. The things that threatened me Ne'er looked but on my back; when they shall see The face of Caesar, they are vanished." (Caesar. II.ii.10-12) "...Danger knows full well That Caesar is more dangerous than he."

  2. 'Julius Caesar'- Shakespeare

    Brutus came into a confused and curios crowd. After he explained himself and his purpose, the people were reluctant to believe him, however they were convinced for only a short time. Mark Antony makes a speech after Brutus. He has a difficult task of speaking to a hostile crowd outside the Roman Parliament where Caesar was stabbed to death.

  1. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of the speeches of Brutus and Antony in Act 3 Scene ...

    The citizens are now beginning to regard him in a new light. The phrase "Yest Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man" is now at its second repetition, each time the level of sarcasm is increasing all the more.

  2. How suitably is the theme of the supernatural depicted in the play 'Julius Caesar'?

    events taking place, "Why all these fires, why all these gliding ghosts". Cassius welcomes the tempest and despises Casca's fear. (Act1Scene3). "That thunders, lightens, opens graves, and roars", Cassius hints that the tempest is a warning that should rouse the people of Rome, and even the dead become alive.

  1. Show how Shakespeare demonstrates the use of persuasion with close reference to the play ...

    Cassius' persuasion is seen as devious and powerful. He is a very clever man, shrewd and impulsive. Brutus is a victim of persuasion a lot in the play. His sense of honour makes it easy for Caesar's enemies to manipulate him into believing that Caesar must die in order to preserve the republic.

  2. Julius Caesar

    The crowd should feel sympathetic towards Brutus as he thought that if he killed Caesar, Rome would become better. Also Brutus had a troubled mind in the beginning about what he should do - he was forced and manipulated. Brutus was a very honest man who killed himself when he realized what destruction he had done to Rome.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work