• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part of the War. However, not all later interpretations fully follow it. Why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of Britain The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part of the War. However, not all later interpretations fully follow it. Why? Introduction It was obvious that after France surrendered to Hitler on 17th June, Britain would be the next victim of the Blitzkrieg, but the Dunkirk evacuation, which was seen by the British public as a victory, enabled the Allies to prepare themselves for war. It is said that Hitler did not have big intentions on invading Britain. He really planned to invade Russia. This was shown when Hitler simply offered Britain a negotiated surrender in July 1940, Britain rejected it straight away, this meant that Hitler had to invade, he codenamed his plan Operation 'Sealion' The English Channel was the only obstacle for the Germans. Hitler realised he had to gain air superiority. Therefore it was up to the R.A.F. to defend Britain from the German invasion. The German fighters started the battle by making intense attacks on the British shipping in the English Channel to clear the Channel of ships and to draw out and to destroy as many British fighters as possible before the full frontal attack on Britain itself. This intense bombing went on for weeks. As well as ships, the Luftwaffe destroyed almost 260 British fighters. The Luftwaffe felt that the time had come for a really massive strike to finish off the R.A.F., but what it did not know was that the destroyed British fighters were frequently replaced (late July to 11th August) At this early stage of the war a popular myth about the Battle of Britain had emerged. From the 12th August until the 23rd August Eagle Attack was launched upon Britain. Almost the whole of the Luftwaffe attacked a large number of targets all over the country; radar stations, airfields, factories and naval bases, at this stage the Luftwaffe had almost defeated all the British air force and left the targets brutally demoralised, but because ...read more.

Middle

He mentions Dowding and says how he could not defeat the enemy. He says that the British plans were better than 'anything the Germans had produced' which I know is true. Lastly he mentions the radar systems in an in direct way. All of these were not mentioned in the earlier interpretations. He has mentioned all of the above so that his article appeals to its readers. Maybe he wrote this article for propaganda, but this is unlikely because the outcome of the battle is known and there is no need for propaganda. This article should be quite reliable because it is written by a historian, meaning that his writing should be well researched, but he had very traditional and patriotic views and was not afraid to include his own personal views in his writing of history, which makes his writing unreliable because some of the things he says may only be his own view of what happened, also he is nationalistic and biased because he is British, and therefore he probably would have exaggerated, although by reading some of the things he has mentioned, we can see that he has done good research. He has the benefit of hindsight, which means that he could look back at the earlier war events. The next interpretation is by J.R.M. Butler in 1957, this was after the war, when the government authorized the official history of the Second World War and invited distinguished military historians to write a book. This interpretation shows how the British had success. It mentions that Hitler was defeated, but he did not intend on invading Britain, he really wanted to invade Russia. Hitler's plan was that when he invaded Britain and crumbled the British morale, he would then go on to 'operation Barbarossa' which was a codename for the invasion of Russia and then he would go on to invade the rest of Europe. ...read more.

Conclusion

* To make the public realise that the pilots have played a role in defending Britain, and so should they. * To boost the morale of the pilots, to make them think that they were winning even though they were outnumbered. * Makes people want to believe they are winning even if they are not. The people believed the myth because it was all around them (on posters, in radios, newsreels, in newspapers and in Churchill's famous speeches) and they constantly heard it. Also the government was in control of all the means of media, so they only showed/told people what they wanted the people to see/hear. Later interpretations differ from earlier one (how-mentioned above in part2) because know the outcome of the Battle is known- the British have won. The German side of the story was being hared, they were written not for propaganda, they are aimed at different people e.g. students. At the early stages of the war all they wanted to do is to distract people with the myth, they did not care about anything else. But when the war was over, historians only then had the benefit of hindsight and only then did they realise other factors that bought Britain to victory e.g. radars. Also I think that Hitler had not really intended on invading Britain, he really wanted Russia but when Britain rejected the peace treaty made him angry and he also used the Battle of Britain as a cover up of his secret planning of an invasion on Russia (operation Barbarossa). Also he admired the Britain, whose empire he believed powerfully reinforced his ideas of racial domination. The help o all the other nations pilots helped win the Battle, because the British were already outnumbered. The nations that sent their fighter were, Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, South African, Southern Rudician, Irish, American, Polish, Czech, Belgium, French and Israeli. All the factors that were mentioned above helped the British win the Battle of Britain. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did William win at the Battle of Hastings?

    This is typical of Harold as a person, acting too quickly without thinking and being quite impatient. By attacking early his army was not at it's strongest. It could be that he acted quickly because he had heard about the Normans robbing and terrorising parts of Sussex.

  2. A wife in london

    is not much happening in her life at the moment and all she is doing is waiting for her husband to return. In the second section of the poem, which is the day after she has heard of her husband death, Hardy has written 'the fog hangs thicker'.

  1. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    These are the reasons that I believe made poor planning the main reason for the battle of the Somme to be regarded as such a big military cataclysm. I believe that poor planning is a good main structure for a causal web as it links to many things such as pal battalions for example.

  2. English Short Story

    There are some differences to be noted. At Chancellorsville it was Jackson who attacked; at Pickett's Mill, Howard. At Chancellorsville it was Howard who was assailed; at Pickett's Mill, Hood. The significance of the first distinction is doubled by that of the second. The attack, it was understood, was to be made in column of brigades, Hazen's brigade of Wood's division leading.

  1. Saving Private Ryan Examine Steven Spielberg's use of images and Presentation of war. ...

    and shows the audience how scared the soldiers where likely to be and the poor conditions they lived in. I believe that the use of non-diegetic sounds signifies the start and end of the battle scene. Diegetic sounds are used during the battle scene's to show how people had to

  2. "Assess the importance of Britain's contribution to the defeat of Germany in WWI"

    On 30th November the Germans counter attacked and made the tanks retreat in three days, the Germans regained all the land they had lost. The battle was called a draw, but still the tanks had proven they were a good weapon for the British because they needed to be offensive and the Germans only needed to be defensive.

  1. 'Stalingrad was the most significant turning point of the war on the Eastern Front ...

    The limitation with this is that it is one person's view, which may not have been shared by the whole army. Source H shows how German morale lowered due to the battle. There were 'doubts among the civilian population and in high military circles.'

  2. Write a descriptive piece based on the theme of war or disability or degradation.

    said a novice Silence surrounded the room. What WOULD they do if one of them was injured and there were no experienced soldiers present? Before they went to sleep, they all made sure that their kit was clean and ready to save themselves from a pre-battle lecture from the remorseless corporals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work