Meursault's murder of the Arab.
Meursault is arrested and brought to trial. During the trial, it becomes clear that various members of the courtroom
feel a need to explain the senseless, unmotivated killing. It refuses to convict him of the murder without giving a
sensible explanation for him doing it.. Unfortunately, Meursault ends up being tried and sentenced to death more on
the basis of his atheism and lack of emotional attachment to his mother than on the basis of anything connected to
the murder. By the end of the trial, the court interprets his lack of emotional attachment to his mother as an
explanation of the murder, and vice versa. Together, the two justify the prosecutor's definition of Meursault as a
"monster."
Meursault's predicament develops Camus's idea of the absurd. He focuses on the problem of accepting the absurd
world we live in without going mad. Meursault becomes the Absurd Hero when he can accept the absurdity of the
reasons for the court finding him guilty without sinking into depression. Hope is just a distraction from the short time
he has left but Meursault still manages to stay optimistic, which allows him to make the most of the short life he has
left.
It is clear that the author is always trying to get a reaction from the reader by keeping the reader changing their
opinion of Meursault. He does this by using vague language with double meanings and this tends to make you keep
changing your mind about what it could mean. Meursault doesn’t seem to have a memory or an imagination and
doesn’t connect up events in life with any meaning. The person reading the story sort of does this, or else the story
has nothing to keep your interest. This means that each person will have created their own idea of the type of person
Meursault is, and this is exactly what the author is trying to do. When the court tries to get Mearsault to think about
his past and use his memory and then again when he is in his jail cell and has nothing to do but imagine he is forced
to develop his own awareness of his life. This in turn means that the reader has then to start to compare between the
ideas they had conjured up themselves and those now being shown from Meursault himself.