To What Extent Does William Golding Portray Mankind As Being Inherently Evil?

Authors Avatar

To What Extent Does William Golding Portray Mankind As Being Inherently Evil?

Sir William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies, was born on 19th September, 1911 in Cornwall.  A rational, scientific view of life was forced on him by his parents, but he sensed the dark, irrational world was all around him.  The surroundings he was raised in included a 14th century house in a churchyard with a dark graveyard and dank cellars; these heavily affected his beliefs and views of the world.  He went to school in Marlborough, before going to Oxford and (eventually) studying English Literature.  He joined the Royal Navy during World War II, which is where he found inspiration for Lord of the Flies.  After World War II had ended, he returned to teaching before leaving in 1962 to become a full-time writer.  Lord of the Flies (1954) was Golding’s first novel, and is undoubtedly his most famous.  Golding died in 1993, aged 82.

It is hard to classify Lord of the Flies as a certain type of story.  It is often described as one, or a mixture, of three things:

•        A Myth is an ancient, traditional story which doesn’t have to be true but explains the unexplainable like human nature or the world we live in.

•        A Fable is a simple story, often using animal characters with a moral (hidden message) which can be seen in, or applied to, real life.

•        An Allegory is a story with two levels of meaning – the literal interpretation and a spiritual, moral or religious level.

Lord of the Flies is mainly an allegory, as the war between the boys echoes a real war going on as well.  It is not just a story about boys on an island – the island is a microcosm of the real world.  This war could be World War II, but as the novel was written in 1954, nine years after WWII ended, it seems unlikely.  The war is more likely to be a future war where the threat of nuclear attack is even greater.  However it is not accurate to just call it an allegory, as it has elements of fable and myth in it as well.

Jack and Roger are both evil characters; their evil is present from the start of the novel, but it is yet to surface, but it is clear from the start that they are disagreeable people.  As soon as Jack arrives at the gathering of boys, he insults Piggy.

        “‘You’re talking too much,’ said Jack Merridew.  ‘Shut up, Fatty.’”

This is unnecessary abuse towards Piggy, and it shows that Jack considers himself to be better than his peers – in this case, the other boys on the island.  Ralph then stands up for Piggy by telling the group that he isn’t called “Fatty”, which seems to please Piggy.  However Ralph feels a twinge of evil in him, and decides to go against Piggy’s wishes and make fun of him, maybe getting Jack to like him at the same time.  He does this by telling everyone that “his real name’s Piggy!”.  This makes everyone laugh at Piggy, which makes Ralph feel one of the crowd more, as many other people are making fun of Piggy.  However, he may have genuinely forgotten – as he tells Piggy later on, but I find this unlikely, after the amount of fuss that Piggy made.

Join now!

Golding intentionally made Jack a figure of dislike; he is very arrogant and egotistic, and he assumes others will obey him.  The reasons he gives for assuming leadership (the fact that he is a chapter chorister, can sing C sharp and is a head boy) are irrelevant, although being a head boy will provide experience of leadership.  Being a chorister even suggests he has angelic properties; though, we find out later that this is definitely not true.  He is solely interested in non-vital hunting (there are other food sources available).  Later on in the novel, Jack uses the skills ...

This is a preview of the whole essay