• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is the Battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

Extracts from this document...


Why is the Battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy? After the Germans Schieffen Plan had failed both sides tried various attempts to make a break though. These were made mainly by the allied troops. Many of the breakthroughs in 1915 included Chapelle, Ypres and Loos, however only small areas of land were gained. In 1916 the German army tried to destroy the French at Verdun; for they knew that the French would pour men into protecting it. Their aim was to "Bleed France dry". The battle lasted six months, and the French did not collapse. However they needed help so they asked the British to bring forward the attack on the Somme in order to relieve the pressure. The aim of the Somme was to "kill as many Germans as possible". As this battle had been moved forward from August to July because of Verdun it became a mainly British fight. The Somme is regarded as a great military tragedy because it had a huge death count and this was the turning point on the view of the war at home. The Somme had a huge effect on the attitudes at home and of the views of the generals and the leadership of the war. ...read more.


Also the communications were so bad that the Germans knew everything about the attack, the tactics when everything was going to take place and what the signal for "going over the top" was. For example a quadrant of men had just sent a group "over the top" and they none had made any progress, so a message was sent to the generals to ask whether another group should go "over the top", the decision was that they shouldn't however as the communications were so bad it didn't arrive in time and they went "over the top" and died. This made it very easy for them to defend themselves. The tactics didn't reach their target and lost many thousands of men. However it wasn't just that the tactics used at the Somme weren't good, it was also the fact that the weapons weren't brilliant either. During the artillery bombardment there were 1� million shells fired (in the first week), 1/3 of them didn't explode. This is shown by the fact that today 90,000 a year are found unexploded. As well as that tanks were first used at the Somme, they were seen as the weapon that would win the war; however it didn't seem like that at the Somme. ...read more.


Also the tactics that had become a success weren't built upon, so therefore it showed that the generals were narrowed minded and not very educated in that didn't seem to see what was wrong with their attacks. Also the weakness of the generals was an important point in that even with all their experience trench warfare was different and difficult to plan. Generals had know idea what to do, because this was a new type of warfare. Even with military schooling generals didn't know because defence was important in trench warfare and in the schools attacking was taught to be important. This is an important point in that if the tactics were built upon they could have meant that the Somme would have had a better effect for the British. However the most important is the huge human cost. The battle of the Somme lost thousands of men, and for some of them it was there first and last fight. The human cost had a huge effect on the view of the war back home. It was the turning point, for after the battle conscription had to be brought in. this showed that the people of Britain had changed their views on the war. It now seemed to them to be a terrible thing instead of an exciting one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Was the Battle of the Somme a success or a failure?

    The next part to Haigs plan was for the British to walk out of their trenches and walk over no mans land and capture what they had thought were empty trenches.

  2. The Battle of Passchendaele (The Third Battle of Ypres)

    On that very day, Haig handed back the battle to the command of Plumer and his staff. He immediately drew up some 'bite and hold' attack plans to take the Gheluvelt Plateau and the Broodseinde and Passchendaele Ridges. Plumer requested, and got, a three-week period to perfect his attack plans and to ready the men.

  1. Are knights and castles a sufficient explanation for Norman military success between 1066 and ...

    In addition to knights and castles, other factors influenced the military success of the Normans, such as the technique of harrying. This was a military technique used by William to get the North of England to come under his control.

  2. The battle of the Somme - This analysis is to debate whether or not ...

    It talks about how well everything was going and how good the plans were, " i can say that the heartening news of the last few days has confirmed our anticipation and hopes that the tide has now turned in our favor."

  1. Book Review: First Day on the Somme

    (288) Middlebrook proposes the consequences of the hesitation. After two days at Montauban, Rawlinson decides to progress the soldiers, but by that time cooperation with the French army in the area had broken down and the Germans were regrouping and prepared for such an attack. A crucial opportunity had been missed.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    This book does mention the myth 'a few hundred young fighters. He also mentions Churchill's famous phrase 'Never, in the field of human conflict, was so much owed by so many to so few' which is part of the myth.

  1. The Battle of Britain

    He keeps to the popular interpretation stressing its importance, the defeat of evil and "the few". However he does hint that there were other factors that contributed to the victory which include the planes being far superior in quality, equipment, radar advantage and the leadership of Hugh Dowding.

  2. The Crimean War.

    field in front of them certain officers, notably Captain Morris of the Light-Brigade, and Captain Nolan, who carried the order to charge, were impatient for the Light cavalry to charge and 'finish off' the Russian troops. It was Lord Cardigan's Light Brigade that would have to lead any forward movement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work