• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

3. Who was the more important in bringing about the end of apartheid and minority rule in South Africa, Nelson Mandela or president de klerk? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3. Who was the more important in bringing about the end of apartheid and minority rule in South Africa, Nelson Mandela or president de klerk? Explain your answer. Both were important in bringing down the apartheid but in my opinion it was Nelson Mandela as he was the main reason why the rest of the world saw and put pressure on President de klerk or he wouldn't have released Nelson Mandela from prison if he weren't so popular, and had many millions of people on his side. Mandela, a black South African, dedicated his life to stand up to the apartheid in South Africa. ...read more.

Middle

He taught people that apartheid was wrong, and took it upon himself to try and change things. He dedicated everything he did to something he believed so strongly in, however he, himself could not put an end to apartheid in South African, but played a very important part in opposing it and influencing others to believe what he did. FW De Klerk became president in 1990, he was the son of a leading National Party politician, and he was a life long National Party member and believed strongly in racial separation. Therefore he did not seem like someone who was going to change much. However he came out, surprising everyone, in his first speech as president he, took of the ban on the ANC, the ...read more.

Conclusion

South Africa's economy was in a lot of trouble and if the apartheid continued there was a risk of this increasing. Lastly, De Klerk was a religious person and believed God had called him to lead South Africa to a new future. We can assume that the reasons above are why De Klerk ended apartheid, however the real reason is not known. Son in conclusion I think that both men helped each other to achieve what they both wanted. Nelson Mandela played a part in his whole life against apartheid and De Klerk made it happened. However without each other none of this would have bin achieved. Therefore if this were not carried out then maybe right now the apartheid would still be going on in Africa between the white democracy and ANC. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Describe the treatment of black Africans in South Africa in the 1930s and 1940s.

    In 1937 a law was set up to limit the amount of blacks that could live in an urban area in anytime. This meant that blacks had to live in the rural areas. That law was called Native Laws Amendment Act.

  2. The role of Nelson Mandela

    The ANC viewed themselves as a legitimate political group who had a valid call for power. They tried to shrug off all ideas of Nelson Mandela and the ANC as terrorists as this defeated their cause. For this reason they describe Mandela as a political prisoner in jail because of 'the colour of his skin'.

  1. South Africa and Apartheid: Have the effects of apartheid disappeared?

    Laws of segregation were designed to enforce this. Laws such as Bantu Education Act which limited the curriculum for black students kept whites in labour power in the long run. Because the blacks had no vote or no freedom of speech, they were not listened to.

  2. Apartheid in South Africa

    One of the things whites feared the most about the freedom charter would have been the term in which, "The people shall govern" This gave every man and woman the right to vote, and stand for election.

  1. Describe The Treatment of Black Africans in South Africa in the 1930's and 1940's

    The fact that the whites were at war was a major break through for the blacks because the companies would need people to work there. Like the mining and manufacturing companies, they needed people to make all the guns and machines.

  2. How far did the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 influence the transition to ...

    The aim of the movement was to end the dependence blacks had on white society. The movement caused riots in Soweto where more than 700 blacks died and 970 buildings were destroyed. The death of Steve Biko in 1977 made him appear as a martyr of apartheid which encouraged many young people to defy the government at almost any costs.

  1. In your opinion, was the warren commission correct in its conclusion? Explain your answer ...

    These test were conducted in 1964. This shows that it is impossible to aim and fire a shot within 1.66 seconds. It also proves that you could not have loaded the bullet within the required time. Police marksmen were unable to aim and fire two consecutive shots within the required time of 1.66 seconds.

  2. Why did white minority rule last so long in South Africa?

    This is elementary of course when looking at the relative populations of white and colored peoples in South Africa, in 1978 the difference in population stood at 4.5 million whites to 19 million blacks. Any unified struggle on the part of the Black people would have surely been enough to overthrow the white regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work