• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


GCSE 1637 MODERN WORLD HISTORY COURSEWORK: 'WAS PROHIBITION BOUND TO FAIL?' NAME: George Morrissey TOTAL MARK: /50 = /25 [A] Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? In source A it mentions of the bad influence of saloons and other reasons why prohibition was enforced. Also in the wording it shows that alcohol was bad for example "bad influence of saloons" but the source goes into more detail about the criminal side of prohibition describing the criminality of Americans when this law was in place for example "No earlier law produced such widespread crime" In Source B this passage goes straight in by describing alcohol as a "great evil." Also the wording like "victory" saying it as a triumph of banning the brewing of alcohol. Source B says things against prohibition as well but doesn't go into as much detail about it as source A does. So from my point of view I do not believe source A goes far at all with agreeing with prohibition because it describes the criminal side more than the other side. Whereas I believe source B backs up and agrees with prohibition because of the description and wording of the passage. [B] Study Sources C and D. ...read more.


the chart but if you compared it to the amount of alcohol that was successfully smuggled I think that the number of captured alcohol would be very low. And in source H I think it shows prohibition in a bad way because in the chart all the numbers gradually increase and I believe if prohibition was successful the numbers would be declining because of less drink getting into the illegal bars so therefore there were less people getting drunk. [E] Study Sources I and J. How far does Source I prove that the policeman in Source J is telling the truth? Source J is an account of a policeman during the prohibition; he speaks from Chicago where Al Capone was infamous for his smuggling of alcohol. The policeman says that he was new to Chicago and the first thing that happened was a man came up to him and offered a bribe. Source I can back this up because it shows many different types of officials holding there hands behind there backs waiting for bribes from the criminals. But also from this, in source J the policeman is only patrolling the streets and not expecting any bribes and is surprised when he is offered one by a man. But in Source I the officials are all corrupt waiting there expecting a bribe with there hands out. ...read more.


successful the numbers should have decreased in number because the officials were being successful with catching bootleggers but instead the numbers have increased which shows failures for prohibition. Source I is a cartoon source and it shows all the officials holding there hands out expecting bribes, this shows prohibition was inevitably a failure because without all the officials support on prohibition it was never going to work and if these officials are all taking bribes they don't have full support on prohibition. Reading source J is an account of a policeman talking about when he was walking through Chicago and he was offered a bribe from someone. This shows prohibition could be nothing but a failure because it sounded from that extract that bribing a police officer seemed quite easy and it seemed that there was no bad consequence for bribing the officer because he accepted it so if it was that easy to bribe an officer there must have been a lot of people doing it. From studying all these sources I believe that it was inevitable that prohibition was going to fail because the only three sources that aren't against prohibition are ones that don't explain about what is bad with alcohol it just shows it in a bad way whereas all the other sources show reasons of why prohibition could and will fail. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    In 1920 the commissioner states that he will do his job properly, however this was said before the rise of the gangsters and he could have later been corrupted by bribery like many prohibition and police agents were from gangsters like Al Capone.

  2. Why did prohibition fail? - Gangsters, Widespread illegal drinking, lack of support, impossibility of ...

    The public did not want to be told what they could and couldn't drink by the government and felt that they had no reason to not drink if they could get away with it, which leads to another reason why Prohibition failed - lack of enforcement.

  1. To What extent was Prohibtion doomed to fail from its inception?

    The American citizens found many ways, not just through the speakeasies, of getting hold of alcohol. One way in which American people were able to get alcohol during the period of Prohibition was by getting to from either Canada or Mexico, where the consumption and production of alcohol was not illegal, and taking it over the borders.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    This shows how rapid the business increased in such a small amount of time and gives rise to the fact that maybe Prohibition was not that successful. We also need to take into consideration that even at 192, 414 000 gallons were seized and this was only the first year that Prohibition had been set in.

  1. GCSE Coursework: Prohibition

    Another problem with the source is that it doesn't tell us what the people actually did, it doesn't say if they made moonshine, sold alcohol or drunk and disorderly and it doesn't give us figures for before the 18th amendment.

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    Source E, an extract of a letter written by John D. Rockefeller, appears to be very reliable. It says that "Drinking has generally increased; the speakeasy has replaced the saloon... and crime has increased to a level never seen before" - this is true as there were in fact more

  1. Was prohibition bound to fail?

    The very concept of Prohibition would probably have seemed, at the time, a very good idea. There is no way of denying that alcohol does hold the responsibility for a certain amount of crime, immorality and violence and for this reason the enforcement of Prohibition was not pre-destined to fail.

  2. Why did Prohibition Fail?

    which illustrated the first problem involved in the failure of the "noble experiment". The poor presence of public support created a downfall for Prohibition which saw the birth of Prohibition agents, two successful agents Isadore Einstein and his deputy Moe Smith.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work