• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of sources describing the changes brought about by evacuating children in WW2.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐The feared bombing of England by Germany during the Second World War threatened to jeopardise the safety of civilians, especially those in main cities targeted. To prepare, the Government planned Operation Pied Piper, at the outbreak of war, this lead to the mass evacuation of millions to the safety of the countryside. This upheaval caused many short and long term changes to people?s lives. During this essay I will explore the contrasting experiences people had and compare this with existing knowledge of the period to comment on the reliability and utility of the sources. Many people say the poverty children were in when they arrived in reception areas lead to a long-term change in Britain; it brought about ?The report to the Parliament on Social Insurance and Allied Services? or the Welfare State in 1942, and then the NHS in 1948. In source A2, which was taken from a school text-book written in 1993 by a group of history teachers, it outlines the shock the local residents of the reception areas felt when they saw the ?dirty? and ?deprived? children arriving from ?industrial cities?. ...read more.


Overall, both sources are clear in accentuating the bad conditions some children were in whilst in cities, and the long term changes it triggered after the war. Although privileges were what some children were met with, some had a totally different experience; this was what happened to Mrs. Beryl Preedy in Source A4. She was seen as ?help? and remembers doing chores like cooking and cleaning, and also falling down the stairs because the staircase was dimly lit. This completely contrasts with Bernard Kops in source A6, who was met with benefits and adds to the idea that there was an assortment of changes people experienced. Source A4 was taken from Mrs. Beryl Preedy?s book (1992), which was based on the diary she kept during her life as a wartime evacuee. This makes the source quite reliable, as her diary is a personal item that most likely would not have been sensationalised, and as it was not written from memory, experiences were not blemished. ...read more.


It also recapitulates the ?deep and long-lasting? effects it had on education, health and welfare. As this source was written by a historian who had the benefit of hindsight, I believe it is quite reliable. To terminate, I believe that these sources are useful and reliable in telling us how some people lives were changed by evacuation. The sources are clear in outlining the different conditions evacuees were in, and the changes in Britain this brought about, but are lacking diversity in the type of person affected. Most of the people in the sources are children, and come from the point of view of an evacuee or a host family, they fail to mention the other types of people evacuated or the families left behind in the main cities. Although there was a range of different experiences, all the sources are quite personal, which means we don?t get a sense of the bigger picture and how people on a whole were affected by Evacuation. 868 Words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. In WW2, evacuation was very important for the safety of children, how effective was ...

    The main reason for evacuation was safety for the child, but the other one is safety for the parent. When there is an air raid the parent wouldn't need to worry about getting the child to the shelter, they could just go themselves.

  2. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    Not only did the war affect men and women but also children. As before most of the changes were for the worst. The biggest and most extreme of these changes was evacuation. Children were sent to places in Kent, Sussex, Wales, Devon and Cornwall with major evacuation starting on September 3rd 1939.

  1. Explain the Differing Reactions of People in Britain to the Policy of Evacuating Children ...

    was produced before the Blitz began and when parents began to doubt whether bombing would take place or not. As well as the Government Evacuation Scheme, many families took part in private evacuations. These were identical to the government evacuation except for the fact that the child's parents communicated directly

  2. History Assignment 2

    This particular women's account: Source G, is a fairly common case as I know from my own knowledge and that I have seen many other sources with these circumstances. This source could prove somewhat unreliable because it is only one women's account experience, however I do know from my own knowledge that women did experience these conditions.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    are that the foster parents in Scotland are looking after them but source E is giving the impression that parents would not be grateful as they would rather have their children stay at home with them. Source E is also similar to source F.

  2. Evacuation in WW2

    Another Source that can back up my point is Source I, this is an extract from a Mass Observation Survey in May 1940. This man described his dislike for his son to be evacuated to the countryside. He quoted, 'Well, there nothing there, they were starving before the war', this

  1. Why the government decided to evacuate children during WW2

    Children in major cities were evacuated to protect them from the dangers of heavy bombing.

  2. Explain the differencing reactions /feelings of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating ...

    They could only get a small postcard from them, which wasn't in detail, therefore they didn't know if they were being treated well, if they got on with the host, if they were ill etc. Some women who had young children were worried that when they returned their children would be a lot different and their children wouldn't recognise them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work