• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of sources describing the changes brought about by evacuating children in WW2.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐The feared bombing of England by Germany during the Second World War threatened to jeopardise the safety of civilians, especially those in main cities targeted. To prepare, the Government planned Operation Pied Piper, at the outbreak of war, this lead to the mass evacuation of millions to the safety of the countryside. This upheaval caused many short and long term changes to people?s lives. During this essay I will explore the contrasting experiences people had and compare this with existing knowledge of the period to comment on the reliability and utility of the sources. Many people say the poverty children were in when they arrived in reception areas lead to a long-term change in Britain; it brought about ?The report to the Parliament on Social Insurance and Allied Services? or the Welfare State in 1942, and then the NHS in 1948. In source A2, which was taken from a school text-book written in 1993 by a group of history teachers, it outlines the shock the local residents of the reception areas felt when they saw the ?dirty? and ?deprived? children arriving from ?industrial cities?. ...read more.


Overall, both sources are clear in accentuating the bad conditions some children were in whilst in cities, and the long term changes it triggered after the war. Although privileges were what some children were met with, some had a totally different experience; this was what happened to Mrs. Beryl Preedy in Source A4. She was seen as ?help? and remembers doing chores like cooking and cleaning, and also falling down the stairs because the staircase was dimly lit. This completely contrasts with Bernard Kops in source A6, who was met with benefits and adds to the idea that there was an assortment of changes people experienced. Source A4 was taken from Mrs. Beryl Preedy?s book (1992), which was based on the diary she kept during her life as a wartime evacuee. This makes the source quite reliable, as her diary is a personal item that most likely would not have been sensationalised, and as it was not written from memory, experiences were not blemished. ...read more.


It also recapitulates the ?deep and long-lasting? effects it had on education, health and welfare. As this source was written by a historian who had the benefit of hindsight, I believe it is quite reliable. To terminate, I believe that these sources are useful and reliable in telling us how some people lives were changed by evacuation. The sources are clear in outlining the different conditions evacuees were in, and the changes in Britain this brought about, but are lacking diversity in the type of person affected. Most of the people in the sources are children, and come from the point of view of an evacuee or a host family, they fail to mention the other types of people evacuated or the families left behind in the main cities. Although there was a range of different experiences, all the sources are quite personal, which means we don?t get a sense of the bigger picture and how people on a whole were affected by Evacuation. 868 Words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Why the government decided to evacuate children during WW2

    Also, no child care had to be provided for evacuated children. Secondly, the organisation of evacuation gave the impression that Chamberlain's government was in charge and it showed that the government was doing something to protect the people. This comforted the people, because they felt that the government was taking actions to protect them from harm.

  2. Explain the differencing reactions /feelings of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating ...

    When the children returned the fathers found it very hard to get used to their newly independent wives who wanted to have rights and work and have free time, the number of divorces after the war doubled. In an extract from a mass observation survey in may 1940 they interviewed

  1. F Bommber Command decisive in bringing about victrory for Britan WW2

    The reason why there was a change from precise industrial targets to large urbanised areas was because of the overall inaccuracy of Bomber Command. In late 1942 the average bomb error was 1,000 yards and even as technology developed and better mapping devices became available it was only reduced to

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Source E is also similar to source F. Source F is a scene from the film 'Hope and Glory' which was directed by John Boorman in 1987. The scene shows a mother's refusal to allow her children to be evacuated. These sources are similar because they both show parents wanting to keep their children with them in the cities.

  1. History Assignment 2

    Attitudes towards women in the 19th and 20th century were that a women's place was in the home, and work was heavily male dominated. Men felt threatened towards the prospect that they may lose their jobs and those women to take over after the war.

  2. In WW2, evacuation was very important for the safety of children, how effective was ...

    Some other children were sent to places abroad were relatives lived, places like Australia, Canada and the Caribbean. One thing that made children have a bad time when evacuated is whether they were wanted by the hosts; this would make you feel sad, scared and neglected.

  1. Evacuation in WW2

    I think Source G is reliable as evidence about some evacuees because it was true that people who lived in the city were poorer than people who lived in the countryside. To live in the countryside and to own land, people had to have a considerable amount of money at their disposal.

  2. Comparing three sources describing the German bombing of Britain.

    broad spectrum of valuable information which makes it quite a good representation for teaching us about the Blitz.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work