• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Battle Of Hastings

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of Hastings In October 14th 1066, William, Duke of Normandy, Harold Godwineson, Earl of Wessex and both their armies, fought a treacherous battle at Hastings to claim the throne of England. The battle lasted for nearly 9 hours and many men were killed in the process. But in the end, Harold was killed and William won the battle, thus claiming the throne. Here are the four main reasons behind William's victory. The first reason why William won the battle was because of his skills. An example of this is that when Harold put his army in a strong position on a hill, William was full of will power and was determined to destroy it. William also persuaded many powerful French nobles into joining his army and to fight for him by promising them land in England when victorious. ...read more.

Middle

William also won because of the few mistakes made by Harold, such as: When William's men started running away, Harold sent his men to chase after them. It was actually a trick and the Normans killed them. Another example behind this is that Harold did not let his men rest before the battle and his men were already worn out and could not fight as well as they could with full energy. Harold also wasn't that good a strategist and put his men in a tightly packed formation, which made moving very difficult. And after the battle with Harald, he did not share his booty with his men and so many soldiers left his army. The final example of Harold's mistakes is that he chose to wait all summer for William in the south coast but instead the Vikings arrived first in the north. ...read more.

Conclusion

This example is also linked to the fact that in the middle of the battle, Harold was killed, partly because his army was weaker now. Many of his men did not want to fight any longer without their leader and fled. And because of this, William was able to be leading in the battle. The last reason William won has something to do with the two armies. An example of this is William's men were heavily armoured and rode war horses and William had brought professional soldiers to join his army. But Harold's army was mostly made of untrained farmers and peasants. And so William's army was clearly the more powerful one allowing William to have an easy battle. Overall, I think the main reason for William winning the Battle of Hastings was his skill. This is because an un-skilled leader would not win a battle with pure luck and the advantage of his enemy's mistakes, let alone having a good army. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Why Did William Of Normandy Win the Battle of Hastings?

    William of Normandy's Claim to the throne of England was: William justified his claim through his blood relationship with Edward the Confessors they were distant cousins. William also claimed that Edward the Confessor had made him as his successor. William claimed Harold Godwinson had sworn a sacred oath of his right to the throne.

  2. Why did William the Conquerer win the battle of hastings

    as he had planned, some of the Saxons chased them down the hill. Immediately, the Normans caught up with them and cut them into pieces.

  1. The battle of britain and the battle of the atlantic project.

    If the Germans had attacked quicker the RAF would probably had been too weak to hold them off. At the beginning of the war there was only 1 Army division in Britain. They had no tanks or anti-tank guns. However, because there was no quick German attacks, the productions grew.

  2. Battle of Hastings

    go to the south without enough rest plus in the middle of the battle he changed his battle tactics and told a part of his army to pretend to run away knowing that Harold's inexperienced soldiers would chase after them to try to slaughter them and by doing that they would make the shield weaker.

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    Stated by Sergeant Charles Windolf, 7th cavalry. From the negative aspect of his personality in this quote, it enables us to see that it is impossible to tell why and what was going through his mind on that day. However the source is unreliable even though other sources and facts back it up, because many people during

  2. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    that included killing many Indians, but only losing 6 of his own men. These victories had inflated Custer's ego even more and given him an obscene amount of confidence. This confidence was exactly what made Custer feel so sure that he would win at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

  1. Why did William win the battle of Hastings?

    Luck also helped William because there was a rumour going around that he was killed in battle and his men started retreating, but then William lifted his visor and the Norman army charged back up Senlac Hill. William kept using that on all sides of the hill.

  2. Why did William duke of Normandy win the battle of Hastings ?

    While the French were very powerful they had the best archers in Europe and were coming with 700 ships and 2000 horses. The English used a shield tactic in which they made a wall of shield so the enemy can?t get through but they had to use their tactic in the right way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work