• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chamberlain's policy towards Germany - source related questions and answers

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Study Source A What can you learn from Source A about Chamberlain's policy towards Germany? From Source A, we learn that Chamberlain was evidently in "no position" and not ready to go to war with Germany. Chamberlain describes Germany as "a formidable power", which suggests Chamberlain's view of Germany's strength and how strongly he was against the idea of another war. Also from source A, we learn that Germany may also have been "aided by Italian attacks on our Mediterranean possessions and communications", which Chamberlain thought of as an even bigger threat on Britain's empire if Hitler was united with Italy. This was another reason why Chamberlain's policy was needed. Germany also seemed to know that France's army was strong but also was "desperately weak in some vital spots". Chamberlain knew that this meant if there was another war, not only would the British army fail but the French army would also not be able to withstand Germany's power. Therefore, Chamberlain decided to "adjust" the means of foreign policy in his favour so he could buy himself enough time until Britain's rearmaments, among other countries i.e. France, were "strong". 2. Study Sources A and B Does Source B support the evidence of Source A about Chamberlain's foreign policy? Explain your answer. ...read more.

Middle

Both sources were written before the Munich Conference and invasion of Czechoslovakia. These sources show the first impressions Chamberlain gained of Hitler. Source C shows how Chamberlain thought he was incapable of starting a war and source D shows that Chamberlain thought Hitler was an honest and good man who was true to his word. Both of these first impressions were wrong and Chamberlain was fooled when Hitler took over Western Czechoslovakia. This changed Chamberlain's opinion of Hitler considerably. 4. Study Sources E, F and G How useful are these sources in helping you to understand Hitler's demands in September 1938? Sources E, F and G are all official documents. This suggests that the sources are extremely reliable because it gives the Czechoslovak government and the British government's true points of view. Both governments would not lie on such a serious matter and lie through very important, official statements and therefore are reliable. Source E describes Hitler's demand for "areas of Czechoslovakia with probably 50% German population", which he want to become part of the Reich (the German Empire). This meant he would gain vital areas to Czechoslovakia's wealth and industry, which was the main reason for this demand. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the Munich Conference, Chamberlain gave away the Sudetenland without the consultation of the Czechs. Czechoslovakia was not invited to the meeting because Chamberlain knew they would oppose to the handing over of the Sudetenland region. This action did not please the Czechs and showed Chamberlain to be very cowardly and not courageous in the way he handled the situation at Munich. Source E explains "The British and French governments recognise how great is the sacrifice that is required of the Czechoslovakia government" which shows they should have helped the Czechs if they supported this, but they felt they couldn't help in "the cause of peace". Chamberlain may have been seen as a coward at this time but if he stood up to Hitler, the Rhineland may have not been captured. In conclusion, I agree with the writer of Source H and I think that war was avoided in 1938 because of Chamberlain's foreign policy. This year of peace allowed Britain to become stronger and would not have survived if they went to war with Germany over the Sudetenland. Chamberlain knew that if they went to war when Germany invaded Czechoslovakia six months after the Munich Conference, they would have lost the Battle of Britain and become part of the Reich. Appeasement Coursework 01/05/2007 Kunal Khanna 11WN ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    a way to use the emergency powers as suggested in ii), but it does not prove anything, and it does not say anything about whether Van der Lubbe acted alone or not. Source D suggests that Van der Lubbe set fire to the Reichstag, as it has a picture of

  2. Holocaust Sources Questions

    because it says that most took part in the Holocaust whereas Source J says that most Germans didn't care and it was only a few that joined in. Q.6 Sources K and L are the views of two German Soldiers.

  1. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    Churchill saw Munich as an overwhelming disaster. Churchill blamed the politicians involved for neither preventing Germany from failing to reform Britain. Another quote in this speech is that 10"they quarrelled with Italy without saving Ethiopia." This clarifies that Winston Churchill saw the Munich agreement as a big failure.

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    The stereotypical views this propaganda created also was the gateway for the Nazi Party being allowed to force Jews to emigrate in 1939, without any opposition from the German public. Finally the ultimate crime this propaganda allowed to happen was decided at the Wansee Conference in 1942, where the mass extermination policy of all Jews in Germany was planned.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Other than that, Source J is very accurate, as the photograph wouldn't be edited on computers. Clearly, Source I and J prove that the communist could not have planned all of the fire by only using one man. If the communist were not the mastermind, then it's mostly like that the Nazis were.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    There is no need to lie in this source so it shows the truth. It shows the build-up to 'Kristallnacht'. Overall, I think that this source implies that it was a 'spontaneous event by the German people' because, for example, people owning shops did not want them in there.

  1. The Munich Putsch 1923 - source related study.

    This is another opinion. They are both two very different opinions. It all depends on a point of view. An opinion is a point of view it can not be fact. However it can still help to find the truth.

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    Each step of the process was designed to dehumanise the prisoners, both physically and emotionally. Life in the camps was a living hell. Woken up at dawn and given little bread and liquid. Then sent out to work for 10-14 hours in mines, factories, and road or airfield building, often in subzero weather or the severe heat of summer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work