• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chamberlain's policy towards Germany - source related questions and answers

Extracts from this document...


1. Study Source A What can you learn from Source A about Chamberlain's policy towards Germany? From Source A, we learn that Chamberlain was evidently in "no position" and not ready to go to war with Germany. Chamberlain describes Germany as "a formidable power", which suggests Chamberlain's view of Germany's strength and how strongly he was against the idea of another war. Also from source A, we learn that Germany may also have been "aided by Italian attacks on our Mediterranean possessions and communications", which Chamberlain thought of as an even bigger threat on Britain's empire if Hitler was united with Italy. This was another reason why Chamberlain's policy was needed. Germany also seemed to know that France's army was strong but also was "desperately weak in some vital spots". Chamberlain knew that this meant if there was another war, not only would the British army fail but the French army would also not be able to withstand Germany's power. Therefore, Chamberlain decided to "adjust" the means of foreign policy in his favour so he could buy himself enough time until Britain's rearmaments, among other countries i.e. France, were "strong". 2. Study Sources A and B Does Source B support the evidence of Source A about Chamberlain's foreign policy? Explain your answer. ...read more.


Both sources were written before the Munich Conference and invasion of Czechoslovakia. These sources show the first impressions Chamberlain gained of Hitler. Source C shows how Chamberlain thought he was incapable of starting a war and source D shows that Chamberlain thought Hitler was an honest and good man who was true to his word. Both of these first impressions were wrong and Chamberlain was fooled when Hitler took over Western Czechoslovakia. This changed Chamberlain's opinion of Hitler considerably. 4. Study Sources E, F and G How useful are these sources in helping you to understand Hitler's demands in September 1938? Sources E, F and G are all official documents. This suggests that the sources are extremely reliable because it gives the Czechoslovak government and the British government's true points of view. Both governments would not lie on such a serious matter and lie through very important, official statements and therefore are reliable. Source E describes Hitler's demand for "areas of Czechoslovakia with probably 50% German population", which he want to become part of the Reich (the German Empire). This meant he would gain vital areas to Czechoslovakia's wealth and industry, which was the main reason for this demand. ...read more.


At the Munich Conference, Chamberlain gave away the Sudetenland without the consultation of the Czechs. Czechoslovakia was not invited to the meeting because Chamberlain knew they would oppose to the handing over of the Sudetenland region. This action did not please the Czechs and showed Chamberlain to be very cowardly and not courageous in the way he handled the situation at Munich. Source E explains "The British and French governments recognise how great is the sacrifice that is required of the Czechoslovakia government" which shows they should have helped the Czechs if they supported this, but they felt they couldn't help in "the cause of peace". Chamberlain may have been seen as a coward at this time but if he stood up to Hitler, the Rhineland may have not been captured. In conclusion, I agree with the writer of Source H and I think that war was avoided in 1938 because of Chamberlain's foreign policy. This year of peace allowed Britain to become stronger and would not have survived if they went to war with Germany over the Sudetenland. Chamberlain knew that if they went to war when Germany invaded Czechoslovakia six months after the Munich Conference, they would have lost the Battle of Britain and become part of the Reich. Appeasement Coursework 01/05/2007 Kunal Khanna 11WN ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    his background, which may affect his opinion of the German people and so change the way he sees things. eg; he could be Jewish and so 'bear a grudge' making the source biased. Assuming this source is true then the information which is described, how "men and women screamed and

  2. History GCSE Sources Coursework – The Munich Agreement

    said he would be satisfied with the Sudetenland and not ask any more territory in Europe, he convinced France and Czechoslovakia to submit to the German occupation of the Sudetenland. 4) Study E, F, G and H. What can you work out from these sources about: i)

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Because quote ii is supported with many dependable sources, then obviously it's more likely that the Nazis were the group behind the event. 8) Use the sources and your knowledge of German history to explain why there has been so much disagreement over the Reichstag Fire.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    This source suggests that it was less likely that the Nazis set fire to the Reichstag, as they were not prepared and had other plans for the Communists. Source I is again from a history book published in 1974, so again it's facts could be a little wrong in places.

  1. The Munich Putsch 1923 - source related study.

    The fact that reference is made in source E to the testimony of a witness makes it likely to be more reliable than sources B and C. The reason being that source E has been aided by several witnesses that all agree.

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    When he describes the crowd as being "obviously horrified", it seems a bit of a strange reaction considering that if they were too shocked they may be arrested or taken away, so this may be inaccurate. Buffman himself says "the slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    work more interesting to the public; he could of heard rumours and broadcasted it. Overall, I think that this doesn't support the statement because the source clearly implies that Goebbels and the SA were involved and it was planned, not a 'spontaneous event caused by the German people'.

  2. Nazi Germany Revision 1918-45

    1933 Concordat with the Roman Catholic Church ? the Nazis would not interfere in the organisation of the Church as long as the Church kept out of politics. All Protestant Churches were supposed to unite under one ?Reich Church? led by Bishop Muller.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work