• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chamberlain's policy towards Germany - source related questions and answers

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Study Source A What can you learn from Source A about Chamberlain's policy towards Germany? From Source A, we learn that Chamberlain was evidently in "no position" and not ready to go to war with Germany. Chamberlain describes Germany as "a formidable power", which suggests Chamberlain's view of Germany's strength and how strongly he was against the idea of another war. Also from source A, we learn that Germany may also have been "aided by Italian attacks on our Mediterranean possessions and communications", which Chamberlain thought of as an even bigger threat on Britain's empire if Hitler was united with Italy. This was another reason why Chamberlain's policy was needed. Germany also seemed to know that France's army was strong but also was "desperately weak in some vital spots". Chamberlain knew that this meant if there was another war, not only would the British army fail but the French army would also not be able to withstand Germany's power. Therefore, Chamberlain decided to "adjust" the means of foreign policy in his favour so he could buy himself enough time until Britain's rearmaments, among other countries i.e. France, were "strong". 2. Study Sources A and B Does Source B support the evidence of Source A about Chamberlain's foreign policy? Explain your answer. ...read more.

Middle

Both sources were written before the Munich Conference and invasion of Czechoslovakia. These sources show the first impressions Chamberlain gained of Hitler. Source C shows how Chamberlain thought he was incapable of starting a war and source D shows that Chamberlain thought Hitler was an honest and good man who was true to his word. Both of these first impressions were wrong and Chamberlain was fooled when Hitler took over Western Czechoslovakia. This changed Chamberlain's opinion of Hitler considerably. 4. Study Sources E, F and G How useful are these sources in helping you to understand Hitler's demands in September 1938? Sources E, F and G are all official documents. This suggests that the sources are extremely reliable because it gives the Czechoslovak government and the British government's true points of view. Both governments would not lie on such a serious matter and lie through very important, official statements and therefore are reliable. Source E describes Hitler's demand for "areas of Czechoslovakia with probably 50% German population", which he want to become part of the Reich (the German Empire). This meant he would gain vital areas to Czechoslovakia's wealth and industry, which was the main reason for this demand. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the Munich Conference, Chamberlain gave away the Sudetenland without the consultation of the Czechs. Czechoslovakia was not invited to the meeting because Chamberlain knew they would oppose to the handing over of the Sudetenland region. This action did not please the Czechs and showed Chamberlain to be very cowardly and not courageous in the way he handled the situation at Munich. Source E explains "The British and French governments recognise how great is the sacrifice that is required of the Czechoslovakia government" which shows they should have helped the Czechs if they supported this, but they felt they couldn't help in "the cause of peace". Chamberlain may have been seen as a coward at this time but if he stood up to Hitler, the Rhineland may have not been captured. In conclusion, I agree with the writer of Source H and I think that war was avoided in 1938 because of Chamberlain's foreign policy. This year of peace allowed Britain to become stronger and would not have survived if they went to war with Germany over the Sudetenland. Chamberlain knew that if they went to war when Germany invaded Czechoslovakia six months after the Munich Conference, they would have lost the Battle of Britain and become part of the Reich. Appeasement Coursework 01/05/2007 Kunal Khanna 11WN ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Holocaust Sources Questions

    because it says that most took part in the Holocaust whereas Source J says that most Germans didn't care and it was only a few that joined in. Q.6 Sources K and L are the views of two German Soldiers.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    The reliability of this source is good, with only a few exceptions to doubt it. Firstly, Goering and Goebbels were well known enemies. This suggests that Goering may want to blame Goebbels for 'Kristallnacht' for the sheer fact that he hated him.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    However, common people don't think the fact that the Nazis could've used Lubbe as part of their plan. This also applies to many of the sources given. There aren't dependable proofs to prove that a source is accurate. It is the historian's decision to look at the provenance and to decide whether or not the source is accurate.

  2. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    Take R J Overy for example. He Quotes that 12"It represented a realistic attempt by the Chamberlain government to assess Britain's vital interests and to balance those against reality of Western power." R J Overy believed that an element of stability might be restored to European affairs.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Source D is the cover of a German book about the Reichstag fire, written by a Nazi and published shortly after the fire. The image on the front of the book is of Van der Lubbe standing next to a fire with two men wearing cloth caps and scarves with guns standing nearby protecting him.

  2. The Munich Putsch 1923 - source related study.

    This is an opinion, not a fact; it is not necessarily true. A person might say that Hitler was a leader of an army, he should be brave and help his soldiers/secret police in any and every way possible. He should set an example and raise their morale.

  1. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    Straight away we are given impressions of violence. Buffman uses words such as "ruins ...violence...horror of crowds" to convey his feelings of the Nazi responsibility. We can infer from Source "C" that Buffman disagrees with the Nazis views and that he believes that they are responsible. When Buffman says "no attempts were made to put out the fires"

  2. History GCSE Sources Coursework – The Munich Agreement

    like the look of him, Chamberlain still had faith that Hitler's word meant something and that Hitler's policies were only directed towards uniting all the German speaking peoples, not just getting all the territory he could. Because Chamberlain believed what he said in source D, and believed Hitler when he

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work