• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

Extracts from this document...


Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme? Commander-in-chief during the battle of the Somme, Field Marshall Haig has often been called 'Butcher of the Somme' since the battle. A butcher, of course, is someone who kills animals and prepares them to be sold before selling them himself. However, when applied to a person butcher can mean someone who kills heedlessly, brutally or indiscriminately or someone who bungles things, and this is how people felt abut him. During the war, people at home in England only heard about the war from the point of view of the generals (when they read the newspapers) or their husband, sons, friends, brothers or fianc�s when they wrote letters (which was not a guaranteed way of getting news across, as letters could be lost or intercepted) so they didn't really know what was going on. The newspapers all said Haig was leading the BEF well, so people believed it. But after the war, when the soldiers came home, they told their families and friends what things had actually been like on the front line. ...read more.


His strategies were very unimaginative, they were the same ones used previously in the same war and had not really worked- how could Haig expect them to work now? He also kept sending men in month after month, one replacing another. It apparently did not occur to him that if they were all dying something was not right- maybe it was the fact that his plans were inflexible, and many of his soldiers were inexperienced and could not follow them through properly. Haig was very remote and his officers and generals found him very hard to talk to. They did not tell him how big the casualty rates really were, or how badly their plans were going because they were afraid of him. However, to be fair, Haig never gave up. He was a stable figure of hope for many soldiers throughout the battle. Haig spent an enormous amount of time preparing for that battle, when he became Field Marshall he directed the conversion of the back area of the Somme (from Albert to Amiens, twenty five miles apart) to a military encampment cut by new roads and covert with shell dumps. ...read more.


on (so that the British would have the advantage of higher ground), and though some of the battle plans were unsuccessful, they certainly managed to take over the hill, relive the French and wear down the Germans (which was useful as by then the great war had become a war of attrition). Of course, Field Marshall Haig was only a human being, and no matter how well the battle was planned, and how good a strategist he was, there were always going to be some failures. After all, the German army would have chosen the best commander they could, so Haig was up against someone of his own level, and he carried a lot of responsibility on his shoulders. Because he was Commander-in-Chief any mistake that was made- even if it wasn't his mistake- would be blamed on him. I think that because many people have read or heard the accounts of the soldiers, and how terrible it was for them, they forget that it was an ordeal for Haig as well. In desistance to my conclusion, even if he was a terrible commander in chief and a careless blunderer, he did his best, so how can he be a Butcher? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    This is a fair point to make, but if you consider the state of affairs, if he had not used the tanks he would have been condemned for having not used every means at his disposal. Therefore, whichever judgement he made, would have come under scrutiny.

  2. Haig, Butcher of the Somme

    Conclusion The argument for Haig being a butcher is strong. Fatal tactical errors, including failing to anticipate the effects of the artillery bombardment, provide a strong case even before looking at the causes of these mistakes. Haig failed to collect intelligence regarding his enemy, making assumptions based on past experience in completely different conditions.

  1. General Haig doesn't care about his soldiers.

    This may mean that the number of casualties will be painful to him and the people of Britain. The other side of this, which brings me onto reasons why he may not have cared, is that he may have known that many people would die and he is just preparing Britain for the news.

  2. General Haig: Butcher or War Winner?

    Their fellow soldier Lieutenant George is much more enthusiastic. This deffinatley tells us that Haig didn't care about his men but we have to keep in mind that the episode was made as a comedy and if we do not in to account that if it didn't make people laugh then it wouldn't have been so successful.

  1. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    Haig's mentality is also to be questioned, as his attitude towards human life is simply shocking. His 'attacking initiative' ideas where men are simply thrown over the top on little raiding parties of 10 or 15 people, were madness. Every group died and was just another target for the Germans to shoot down.

  2. Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as the Butcher of the Somme?

    The use of emotive language makes it sound more exaggerated such as words like 'Bitter' this affects its reliability. In source 2, David Lloyd George, British Prime Minister during the first world war he write a lot about his war memories in 1935, this supports the interpretation that Haig was

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    Furthermore because is a primary source it proves reliability. Sir Douglas Haig was not only battling the Somme but also against the interpretations people were developing of him. In December the year of the Battle, Haig's report states 'the German casualties have been greater than ours'. This is somewhat an ambiguous statement.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Many people say that the Somme was Haig's biggest mistake of the war because he rendered useless most of the able-bodied, well trained British men, and replaced them with young, inexperienced and sometimes even disabled boys. While the battle of attrition was probably the objective by the end of the offensive, it was most certainly not at the beginning.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work