• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


Dunkirk and the battle of Britain By jay lewis 11vb 1) How useful is sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like? Explain your answer. Source A is useful in the effect of giving us a first hand account of the events that occurred. The only problem with this source is that we don't know if it applied to many people, or if it just applied to Commander Thomas Kerr. We also need to know the date that this source was written to find out how accurate it really is. Source B also gives us a first hand account of what happened on the beach. But also, only gives us one mans views of what he was experiencing and we don't know how popular this sort of thing was, we would need more evidence to find out how useful this source is. ...read more.


It was written by A.J.P Taylor. Although at the time of Dunkirk it was only seen by people as a great triumph. Only after time as historians studied sources the thought of disaster was introduced. Source D shows the beaches with people being rescued from them. It also shows plains bombing. Its factual accuracy unknown. This is because it is on its own and on its own, the source is hard to tell how accurate it actually is. Also the government used to employ artists to paint 'glorified' pictures of events. The painting was actually painted by a British man named Charles Cundull. If the government didn't employ this man his versions of events would have been bias anyway. ...read more.


He was minister of war. It was written in 1940. This speech was almost certainly written and spoke to keep moral high. We can't exactly rely on this source due to the position that Britain was in at the time this was written. Source H is a source extracted from a British newspaper, published in 1945. The basic facts it explains are correct. What's not accurate is the way the people felt. The way they express this is a little bit bias. this source is also for boosting moral but not as much as source G. this source tells a bit more of what the conditions are really like. Source I is a historians view of the Dunkirk operations. This sources factual accuracy is very good as far as the facts go. This was written by A.J.P Taylor, and was published in 1965. I have come to the conclusion that ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The book could also have been censored. Dunkirk Spirit had a positive influence on the British people. Following Dunkirk over a million men enrolled in the Local Defence Volunteers and everywhere signposts were rearranged and barbed wire and beach fortifications laid in preparation for the German invasion many thought was

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    We would expect this historian to be biased, as he is British, but he tries to give an unbiased account. His extract is very negative towards the Allied troops. The book is written about the United Kingdom defence so he admits that they had a lot of mistakes, but the

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    Hundreds of people gave their boats to help evacuate soldiers off the beaches of Dunkirk. Many sailed their boats across the English Channel, some with no military experience. The braveness of these people was recognized by some of the top figures. J.P Preistly stated on one of his radio broadcast.

  2. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    I also feel the source is biased as the artist is British and works for the government, therefore painting what the government wanted him to paint, which may be inaccurate to the actual events. Although the source shows factors of bias, I do agree with this interpretation of the events at Dunkirk.

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    did make people aware of how bad the situation was amongst the unemployed. The Jarrow crusade didn't get what they wanted. The government didn't get what they wanted. The government didn't do anything about it but at the time the government couldn't do anything about it as it had problems itself.

  2. How successful was Dunkirk

    do not want any further involvement in the war because of their experience in Dunkirk. Atkins is quite reliable as a historian so we would expect him to be well informed and also the source is an eyewitness account which also makes it useful.

  1. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    As planes and men were being destroyed this meant that planes had to be built quickly, however it took longer to train new pilots, therefore the pilots used were young an inexperienced. Period British Planes destroyed German Planes destroyed 1-15 July 51 108 16-31 July 69 117 1-15 August 156

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    This proved to the British citizens that the British navy was something that you could join to because it was so powerful and mighty since they claimed that they had won. This source is written by a person called Ben Walsh, a history teacher and author writing in a GCSE

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work