• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evacuation Of British School Children In World War 2.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evacuation Of British School Children In World War 2 Q1. These two sources show different sides of the start of the children's evacuation journey. Source B is a photograph taken in September 1939 of some evacuees walking to a station in London. The children are waving at the camera and look really happy. Source C is part of an interview with a teacher from 1988. It describes her experience of when she was evacuated with children from her school. From a first impression, source B looks as thought it is a useful, reliable source as what is shows would be what happened when children were evacuated. However, as everyone in the picture is looking at the camera it could easily have been staged. The adults in the photograph (who would have been teachers and helpers that were supervising the children) could have told the children to smile. Because of this, the photograph could have been used as propaganda. If this photograph were shown to parents it would help them with their decision to let their children go. Apart from all the children looking happy, another reason it might do this is that all the children are walking on the pavement. This would make parents think that if the children were all being kept safe here, that they would be in the place they were being sent to - it would also show that the evacuation program was very organised. However, unknown to them, the children could have been forced to walk there for the photograph. In fact, the only way this photo could not have been staged is because they are carrying gas masks and other bags. ...read more.

Middle

The father of this child would probably have been more at ease if all of his questions about the evacuation process had been answered which suggests that the government did not do very well in making information available to parents. The way in which the government chose to deal with problems like this was by using propaganda to convince parents that evacuation was the right thing to do. Source B is an example of something that could have been propaganda. It is a photograph taken in September 1939 and shows evacuees walking to a station in London. It would easily give the impression that evacuation was a success because it looks very organised. However, the children in this picture look to be with their school because of what they are wearing which could add to why it looks organised. I know from other sources such as the film "Hope and Glory" that sometimes parents took their children to the station when they were being evacuated. This shows it wasn't all completely organised and could make it seem like less of a success. All of the children look happy which is a reason to make it look successful. Another source, which would back up that the children were happy, is source D - the picture of the evacuees at bath time. Again they are all smiling and looking happy. However, both of these sources seem reliable but as they are photographs they could easily have been staged. The children could have been told to smile for the picture - and even if they weren't, the natural thing to do when someone takes a picture of you is smile. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were able to do this because they no longer had to stay at home and look after children. Women did such a good job whilst the men were at war that things changed so women would be allowed to do these jobs after the war. Not all of the evacuation experience was good though. Some of the children had been treated very badly when staying with foster parents - many had been forced to do unpaid labour. IT was also a very upsetting time for families as they were torn apart from loved ones. During the time when many children had gone home because of the "phoney war" the blitz began and a lot of the previously evacuated children died. Evacuation should probably have been stricter and children should have been made to stay with foster parents but as it could not have been predicted that Germany would wait so long before attacking this didn't seem very important. After looking at various sources and using my own knowledge, I have decided that I do agree with the statement "Evacuation was a great success". Evacuation had a lot of bad points, but the overall outcome was very positive. Hundreds of lives were saved, out of the 8 million paper coffins ordered, there were only 50,000 needed as only this amount of people died - a tiny amount compared to the death toll of the first world war. It also improved standards of life in Britain after the war. Health improved and the government took a much more positive attitude towards the country. Evacuation was also a success because the well organisation meant that the huge scale operation of transporting people around the country and finding foster parents was pulled off. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World War 2

    This was the only way Britain could attack Germany before D-Day. Their targets were the factories, especially the Ruhr Valley, a major industrial city. The bombing of the cities also decreased the amount of airplanes the Germans sent to the Eastern Front, helping the Soviets.

  2. World war 1

    would get thousands of men killed, because they weren't the ones fighting; they only gave orders. The sources also give us information about a tactic used at the Battle of Somme; 'going over the top'. These sources are useful to us as historians however only to certain extend, because we

  1. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    That is why I think that the government attitude is possibly the most important reason why the government decided to evacuate children from Britain. There are good points and bad points about evacuation.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    resulting in, no food, old ragged clothes and lice in their hair. Basically, it was a dirty environment to live in. Their education was also disrupted; this hugely affected the children's learning abilities. Families had been broken up because of evacuation making many evacuees' experience horrifying and frightening.

  1. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    However the source lacks an attribution and may not hold reliable information. One unfortunate yet important incident that brought the aims of the Suffragette movement into the public eye was the death of Emily Davison, a suffragette herself, at the Epsom races on June 4th 1913.

  2. British Evacuation in World War II

    from the media and they would be extremely worried about their own children. It was vital that the morale of the soldiers was kept as high as possible and with their children evacuated and safe, they would be able to fight and train better, increasing Britain's chances of winning the War.

  1. History Assignment 2

    War on the Home Front was beneficial to the fact Britain won the war. Women supplied ammunition, food and shelter, medicine and health care to the sick soldiers. They also created the 'Land Girls', providing food for the population of Britain, in case Germany blocked our food supplies, which may have forced Britain to surrender.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Many country families were unaware of how city children lived. Evacuees were assumed to have lice and diseases. Some children had no experience of using a knife or fork to eat with. Also a lot of evacuees, like the characters in the source, found that the homes they stayed in were much cleaner than their own.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work