• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evacuation - source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alexandra Salters December 2002 History Coursework 1) Study Source B and C Which source is the most useful as evidence about the start of the children's evacuation journey? Explain your answer using Source B and C and knowledge from your studies. 5 Marks In 1939 many precautions were taken to protect civilians. One was the evacuation of children, (some with their mothers) from the major cities to the countryside. The British Government were expecting immediate air raids and lots of casualties. The Government decided to send children to the countryside in school groups. The "Phoney War" interrupted this process parents were very upset at sending their children away to safe areas and Parents brought many children home. The Government released Propaganda posters in an attempt to persuade parents to leave children in safe areas. Source B is a photograph taken in September 1939. It shows children in a line with parents in the background. All appear to be happy, smiling and waving. They are carrying luggage and from my knowledge I know they would also be carrying gas masks and wearing identification labels. The photograph may have many purposes propaganda- a parent taking a picture as a momentum or a journalist taking it for a local newspaper. The photograph however only shows one part of London, it doesn't even tell us where it was taken or which station the children were going to. Source C is an extract from an interview with a teacher in 1988. ...read more.

Middle

3)"Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree with this statement or disagree with this statement? Explain your answer using all the sources and knowledge from your studies. 15 Marks The government decided at the beginning of WW2 that it was necessary to evacuate all children to the countryside to protect them from German bombing, as the government had expected many casualties and deaths. The "Phoney War" interrupted this process parents were very upset at sending their children away to safe areas and Parents brought many children home. The Government released Propaganda posters in an attempt to persuade parents to leave children in safe areas. Within the question I will look and discuss different sources and conclude whether Evacuation was a success or not. Source A is from a textbook, it explains what happened when children were evacuated. Host families were shocked at the children's behavior and the language they used. Many could not settle in their new environment. From my own knowledge I know this wasn't always the case as some children enjoyed living the countryside and didn't want to go home. I also some children were well behaved and came from good families. Source B is a photograph taken in September 1939. It shows children in a line with parents in the background. All appear to be happy, smiling and waving. They are carrying luggage and from my knowledge I know they would also be carrying gas masks and wearing identification labels. ...read more.

Conclusion

I know from my knowledge that this wasn't always the case and some evacuees had terrible experiences. Source H is another use of propaganda it is asking for more host families in Scotland. Host families were very important as this is were evacuated children would stay. I know from my knowledge that families did take children in for the money they would receive for looking after the children. Most families did this for the money, as some of them hated children. Other did it because they loved children and felt it was important to help with the war effort. Source I is a fathers opposition too evacuation. He tells us that he has a son who he doesn't want to be evacuated. It feels very strongly and doesn't want a stranger looking after his son. He also doesn't think Wales is the best place for his son to go he complains that they were starving there before the War. He then ends with saying that if he is killed during this war there will be plenty of family and friends to look after his son. This is another interview for a newspaper in may 1940 during the phoney he is obviously skeptical because no bombing raids had taken place, he thought his son was perfectly safe. This interview was taken just before the Blitz. Studying all the source I think there is plenty of evidence to show that evacuation was a great success. Evacuation was a necessary precaution and it saved many lives. All sources positive and negative things about evacuation. Overall I believe evacuation was the right course of action to protect Innocent civilian lives. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. History Coursework - Evacuation Assignment

    It was a success for some, and it has been known for some to come out of the experience a lot better off than when they went into it, but also in a lot of cases it was a bad experience for the evacuees and could not be described as a 'great success'.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    It shows evacuee's walking to a train station. They are all smiling and look happy. We cannot fully trust this source because it may be a staged photo used by the government for propaganda. Source D is another photograph, showing that evacuees were clean and happy people, but we cannot trust this source because it says it was issued by the government, so it is propaganda.

  1. Was Evacuation A Success

    expecting 10,000 deaths per raid, with the government aware of this, which is why they introduced evacuation.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    We have no reason to dispute these figures, because they aren't those recorded after battalion role-calls. They are the Official British Army Figures. However we usually round this figure up to 60,000. In comparison, the number of men taken prisoner is minute.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Also, both these sources were probably encouraging evacuation by showing the public how happy the children were who were already evacuated. These sources are also similar in terms of their reliability. Both sources are likely to be staged though source D is probably staged using actors who might not even

  2. The 1913 Derby - source related study.

    is not really interested in what happened so one is vague and one is very bias. Mrs Pankhurst who was the leader of the Suffragettes is claiming Emily is a martyr who gave up her life for the women's cause.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    This cartoon shows us the types of protest that the suffragettes did, very loud and very high profile in comparison to the suffragists who, as we can see in this source did things in a quieter more distinguished way. The publication in which the cartoon was printed may have changed

  2. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    In 1908 Campbell-Bannermann was replaced by Herbert Asquith as Prime Minister. He was another Liberal politician but was against giving women the vote, as he thought they would all vote Conservative and the Liberals would consequently lose power. This did not help the women's cause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work