• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evacuation - was it a success.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Samantha Yates History Coursework Question 2 (b). In this essay I am going to explain whether or not I think Evacuation was a success in the Second World War. I will research this by analysing sources from the Second World War and evaluating each one individually. Evacuation is the removal of children from the Second World War. This was done to prevent any unnecessary harm or injury in the cities. Children were sent to countryside's called reception areas and stayed there over the remainder of the war. The first Evacuees were sent during September 1939. 827, 000 children were sent to reception areas at the beginning of the war and many more were yet to join them. A photograph was taken showing evacuees walking to the station in London during the first month of evacuation. The children in the picture look happy and exited and everything seems to be organised well. This photograph could be used as propaganda in the cities to encourage parents to send their children away from the war. It convinces them that evacuation is a good idea and is the right thing to do. However you could argue that this photo was planned and set up to make people believe it is a great plan. ...read more.

Middle

Foster parents were needed all over the countryside's as more and more children were been evacuated. There was a popular advertisement issued by the government in 1940, which was clearly propaganda. It was a persuasive poster aimed at foster parents and parents in the cities asking for more families to take in evacuated children. It has pictures on it of two children a young boy and girl who are smiling happily. They look clean, tidy and cute, just the right picture to make you believe the children evacuated are in reliable hands. In the text beneath the picture it says how great foster families have been and it thanks them for there work. This shows that evacuation is successful however it could also mean that they are in trouble, as more foster parents are needed urgently, but this may also mean that it is becoming so great that more parents are sending their children away to safety and so they simply need more foster families. There are two sides to this poster but overall I think it shows a successful side to evacuation. Whilst evacuation was taking place it was important to know the opinions of the public on their view of evacuating children. There was a famous survey, which the government took to see how successful the war was, this was called the Mass Observation Survey. ...read more.

Conclusion

I think that this postcard shows that children did not enjoy their stay with the foster families as at the end she says: "I hope I can come home soon." This source does not make evacuation look successful. In total there was over 1 million people sent away on evacuation and all of these remained safe from death, which was the whole idea of it. The government came up with this to stop children dying or getting injured due to battle, and this is what happened. In one view I believe that evacuation was a success as there were so many people who actually went through with it. Also some children liked where they were moved to so much that they continued to live there after the war. Another view however is that it caused a lot of emotional pain for many families to let their children go and also changed so many lives of the country side public through no fault of their own. From analysing the above sources I found that the one's which showed a good side to it were more reliable and useful for evidence and the one's showing that evacuation wasn't successful are not as reliable or exactly accurate. Therefore from the sources I think that evacuation was very successful and a great idea that had a huge impact on the Second World War in the U.K. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    The 3rd wave was a complete failure, more bombs were dropped in 3 months than in the whole of 1943, yet there was no demand for evacuation, and people had a 'stay put' attitude. So evacuation was not a great success for the government.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    Source F is a letter written by a young girl during her time in evacuation. It is very useful because it is taken from the time in the year 1939. She writes to her family about her life being an evacuee living with another family.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    However, the sources differ as source A would have been staged using evacuees while source F was staged using professional actors. Also, the sources show different attitudes towards evacuation. Source A is showing a positive view of evacuation as it shows children smiling and waving as they walk down to

  2. Evacuation was a great success

    This Source also contradicts the other Sources because the father believes the country people to be poor rather than the country people believing the town people were poor. This is another example of the differences in culture of town and country people.

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    This is shown when the teacher in the interview describes the fact that, during the evacuation, as they got to the station, the train was ready for them, this portrays evacuation as being successful because it was well organized. However, there is much more in the source to show that

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    Furthermore, I doubt that the photograph was a form of propaganda as the photo was taken during the period of the evacuation and it was a very busy time and I find it would be quite hard for the government to stage such a photograph at such a busy time.

  1. History Coursework - Evacuation Assignment

    It has been made to be very bias towards one side, and is very staged. Because of these factors it would not be very useful to a historian. 2.) " Source G is an extract taken from a novel. Is it reliable evidence about evacuees?

  2. Britain in the Age of Total War, 1939-45

    Does Source D support the evidence of Sources B and C about the damage done during air raids? Source D supports the evidence given in Source B but appears to give a different picture of the war to that shown in Source C.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work