Explain the reasons why the women's movements failed to win the vote before 1914.

Authors Avatar

Explain the reasons why the women’s movements failed to win the vote before 1914.

     

[ 20 ]

During the early twentieth centaury, the social position of women was very different. The role of a woman was very domestic. They were expected simply to marry, bear children and look after the home. Women were seen as unintelligent, indecisive, emotional creatures that could not cope with politics. William Randall Cramer commented that if women got the vote, they would become masculine and domineering and consequently neglect their household and marital duties. There were also those that thought that if women had the vote, they would stop having children, and eventually the human race would die out.

When the NUWSS was formed to campaign for women’s suffrage, it was met by horror and disapproval. This made the situation difficult for the suffragists, but on the other hand perhaps it would be irrational to expect a more positive response as the traditional social position of women had been upheld for a long time. These feelings heightened with the founding of the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) in 1903. Not only were women campaigning for the vote, but resorting to violence and vandalism to push their cause. The WSPU committed criminal offences such as setting fire to letterboxes, smashing windows and assaulting policemen. These criminal acts probably reduced their support, as people would be cautious of openly supporting dissidents. Perhaps the most shocking for the public of the time was that women who were not ‘women of the streets’ were being imprisoned. Once there, they were not chastened, but proceeded to hunger strike, an action thought typical of lunatics. They even audaciously continued their behavior after the Cat and Mouse Act was passed in 1913. However, the actions of the WSPU did bring the plight of the suffragettes into the public view. For example, Emily Davidson committed suicide (yet another criminal offence) by throwing herself in front of the king’s horse. Public opinion was even more against the suffragettes as there was more anger over the death of a good horse and the insult to the King.

Join now!

Women were also disregarded in the public eye, as they did not represent a united front. The WSPU and the NUWSS were striving towards the same goal, but using very different tactics. This showed the women as indecisive especially when the Women’s Anti Suffrage League (WASL) formed campaigning against the vote. The Women’s Freedom League (WFL) was also established as the result of an argument between the Pankhursts and Millicent Fawcett. Maybe if the women’s movements had been united, they would have been taken more seriously and regarded as a more potent force.

Concerning the passing of laws, public opinion ...

This is a preview of the whole essay