• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Field Marshall Haig "The butcher of the Somme"? - source related study

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 2: Assessment Objectives 2 and 3 Field Marshall Haig "The butcher of the Somme"? a) Source A is a primary source which is contemporary, it is written before the bombardment occurred. I believe that Source A proves a considerable amount that Haig did not care about the lives of his men. This means he was not emotionally involved with them. Source A proves that Haig didn't care about the lives of his men because immediately it says "The nation must be taught to bear losses" then it states that Haig believes to enable to victories to be won there must be a sacrifice of men's lives. These are Haig's exact thoughts because it was written by the man himself before the bombardment. Source B does not prove Source A and the statement correct, I know this because in the first extract in Source B before the attack it states that the men are in splendid spirits and that the barbed wire has never been cut so well Haig says that all the commanders are full of confidence. However how can Haig possibly know the soldiers are in splendid spirits or that the barbed wire has never been so well cut if he wasn't there he was situated quite a distance from the front line? The information was distorted because it was later revealed that the wire was more tangled than ever before due to the relentless bombardment. ...read more.

Middle

The source says 'as unthinking as a donkey' calling Haig stupid. Source H is Pro Haig so is biased because it displays only one persons opinion of Haig. 'They were inspired by his determination', this means that his troops were proud of their general because of his strength of mind. This is proving source F incorrect because it states that had Haig not had the moral courage to shoulder the main burden of the struggle in the Somme battle of 1916, French resistance would of crumbled. In shorter terms it means that if had it not been for Haig and his planning they would of lost the battle of the Somme. Source F clearly states that Haig's plan 'is not at a strategy at all, it's a slaughter' and 'the Somme was a criminal negligence. However, a British general who had fought in both World War 1 and 2 wrote source H so I believe his statement will be biased in favour of Haig because Haig himself was a General and by criticising Haigs decisions as a General in the war he would be criticising his own decisions as a General. I do not believe that sources G and H prove source F wrong. I think that every source is biased in what it says so no Source can individually be trusted. Source F exaggerates deeply in what Haig did and is anti Haig because of the death toll at the end of the battle. ...read more.

Conclusion

When it says 'it's a slaughter' and that the battle of the Somme was a criminal negligence it is saying that Haig slaughtered his own men by sending them over the top and that he left them to die. This source is very anti Haig calling him 'as unthinking as a donkey'. The German government that doesn't agree with the statement that Haig was uncaring and that he sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason but it doesn't disagree with the statement either. Source H is completely disagrees with the statement which claims Haig was uncaring and sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason. Instead the source is all for Haig saying that he was 'one of the main architect of the allied victory'. It says that the soldiers had full confidence in their leader. Source I says 'the tide has definitely turned in are favour' which says that there was a good reason for the Somme. However this source does have its limitations, as the writer could not write what he felt personally but only what the Government as a whole felt. Source J agrees with the statement. The writer was able to write what he felt personally and stated that he questioned Haigs decision of using calvary on a battlefield bristling for miles with barbed wire and machine guns. He claims the attack killed off far more of the British's best soldiers than it did of the Germans. This further reinforces the claim made that Haig sacrificed his soldiers lives for no good reason and was uncaring. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    *Question 4: Tanks were first used in the Battle of the Somme. Using these sources and your own knowledge assess the historians' verdicts on Haig's decisions to use tanks. As the war went on both sides looked for ways to break the stalemate on the western front.

  2. Haig, Butcher of the Somme

    the Somme offensive and should be free from bias, unless perhaps previous generations of his family died fighting. Another major reason for Haig being considered a butcher by the British public, were the opinions of other vocal people. Many soldiers were critical of Haig because they saw their friends being killed and saw Haig as 'almost 50km behind the line'.

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    However being Pals Battalions, their deaths and wounding don't necessarily mean it was done by the oppositions, so if could be seen as Haig's fault; but could have happened through other circumstances, such as the act of help for other family and friends hardship.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    Though, this may have been what he believed or told, so would be the truth to his knowledge. It may have been how a minority of men were feeling. Source C, written by Private George Coppard, years after the war, shows the opposite opinion of the war to Haig's view.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    What is more astounding is that it is said that Haig was completely unaware of the magnitude of the disaster, and even on 2nd July, he believed that only 40,000 men had died in two days, not 61,000 in one.

  2. General Haig

    included the loss of 20,000 allied soldiers killed on day one and 40,000 injured making it the bloodiest day in British military history. Source C is an extract from the British broadsheet newspaper, The Daily Telegraph and was written in November 1998, by the son of Field Marshal General Haig, Earl Haig.

  1. Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

    down due to the fact that Haig told them to walk towards he enemy. The German's had also had a lot of time on their hands and during that time they created concrete dugouts that the soldiers were unaware of, causing even more difficulties.

  2. General Haig doesn't care about his soldiers.

    either what Haig was trying to achieve or the Battle of the Somme and are therefore useless to someone trying to study the Battle of the Somme of General Haig. Having said that both Sources have to have some historical relevance or they wouldn't be funny.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work