• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig Coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1a: In what way are the accounts similar and in what way do they differ? These accounts are very similar and very different in their accounts of their feelings towards General Haig. The similarities of the sources are that all of them were written about world war one and they all also refer to Haig. Finally, they are all written by people who fought in the war, whether before or during the war (source 1) or after the war (source 2 and 3).The first main difference in the sources is that sources 1 and 3 had been in contact with Haig. Source 2, however had 'never had any contact' with Haig, and so lacks primary knowledge, so his account cannot be a fair judgment. Another key difference is if the Kitchener volunteer wrote the account, then he would have written the letter before January 1915. This is before 1916 and 1917, which are the years of Haig's reputed worst wars. Therefore, this person has never witnessed or been involved in any of Haig's battle strategies. Consequently, his judgment that Haig is a good leader is founded purely on looks and on what he has been told, "A wonder full looking man, with a very firm chin and dark blue eyes'. ...read more.

Middle

The writers might have forgotten key facts, and might have felt resentment that Haig was rewarded when the war ceased. Source 2 is obviously quite unreliable, as he appears to be drawing almost all of his conclusions about Haig from what he thinks to be true; 'I don't know anything about generals'. This confirms the narrower perspective that the soldiers had as mentioned earlier. Source 3 reiterates what four (a private letter from Haig to his wife) says; 'I don't think he knew what a trench was like' and '... don't know anything about generals'. It is possibly even more unreliable than source 2, as there is a further element of bias. In addition, there is the fact that they do not know for sure whether their statements are true. He says 'I'm very bitter' and gives negative comments on his post-war rewards (or lack of). Even more ambiguous, source 4 (a prime example of censorship) is very unreliable. When writing to his wife, Haig would have known it foolish to write 'Today, I killed ten of thousands of men and I have thought nothing more of it'. He would not have received a warm reception by his wife (and others who would view the letter) upon arrival back home. ...read more.

Conclusion

Moreover, it was certainly the answer to barbed wire and other defenses put into place by the Germans to slow British advances. This would have delivered a huge blow on German morale. Also, back at home, seeing pictures of the potentially war winning weapon would have greatly strengthened the morale back at home; giving support from the public. Pictures of the tanks would have been shown in the cinemas, which made the viewers think they had a chance of winning, so recruitment went up. After reconsideration, the tank at the time would have seemed a justified course of action. However, after a while, the Germans eventually realised the tanks' flaws, finding strategies for defeating the tanks, and creating blue prints for their own tanks. Also, I believe strongly that Haig was not at fault for using the tanks at that stage of the war, but it was the way they were used. It was thought that if the artillery bombarded the enemies defenses, the tanks would be able to steam right through them. In reality, the artillery shells created giant craters, and turned up mud in which the eventually the tanks would be stuck, or 'bogged down' until they were 'knocked out' with relative ease by the Germans. 5. These sources are taken from a novel, a song, and a poem. How reliable are they as evidence about the role of generals during the war? Explain your answer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    During the war, the allies (Britain especially) organised a naval blockade of German ports with amazing success. The aim was to cut off as much food, trade and raw materials into the country as. Germany's economy suffered greatly from the blockade. Without money coming in, the Germans were not able to fund their war effort as well as they could.

  2. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    The source tells of the terrible conditions and the tactics that meant many were lost and advances were nearly impossible. For example Gough records "when it came to an infantry attack across the waterlogged shell-holes, movement was so slow and tiring that only the shortest advance could be considered."

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    war, the Cavalry Corps took three thousand prisoners and broke through lines of machine guns and artillery in the process. Although this might well have been true, his critics would still continue by saying that he relied too heavily on his cavalry, and did not put enough faith in infantry, or new technology.

  2. General Haig

    included the loss of 20,000 allied soldiers killed on day one and 40,000 injured making it the bloodiest day in British military history. Source C is an extract from the British broadsheet newspaper, The Daily Telegraph and was written in November 1998, by the son of Field Marshal General Haig, Earl Haig.

  1. Windsor Coursework

    Interviews- An interview is a conversation between two or more people, the interviewer and however many interviewees there maybe. When in an interview one may not feel completely comfortable when asked questions maybe they wouldn't like to answer such as "what is your annual salary?"When in an interview you can

  2. (3) GSCE COURSEWORK ON BRITIAN

    with their thumbs-up despite the only thing they have in common is that their houses were bombed. It shows the circumstances of the Blitz, people were able to forget their differences and unite together. This is supported by the fact that people from all different classes were unusually friendly and co-operative towards each other in ARP rest centers.

  1. What was the contribution of tanks towards winning the war for Britain?

    German troops just kept on firing away the tank, unaware that the bullets bounced off - much hotter than when it had left the gun. At the time, it was invincible (considering Germans had never seen it before and had no idea whatsoever on how to overcome this problem)

  2. The Battle of Passchendaele

    The army had had a good victory at Messines ridge under Plumer by using mines. These were impossible to dig at Passchendaele due to the weather conditions, which had previously brought extreme winters with heavy rain and very low temperatures.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work