• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig Sourcework

Extracts from this document...


(a) Study Sources A and B. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? [7 marks] I think that Source A does not prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men. It just shows that he knows that you cannot fight a war without having casualties. You know that he knows this because he says "No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders, no training however good, on the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives." He knows that in this particular battle there will be heavy casualties. You can see this when he says "The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists." Haig's views on warfare were inline with what most people thought at the time. He believed that the country should expect men t loose their lives for Britain to win the war. Source B shows us that Haig was not receiving accurate information. He believed that the barbed wire had been cut, which was not true. ...read more.


Source B also shows that Haig was caring as he is talking about the men's spirit, this shows that he did care about the morale of troops. Source H backs this up and shows that the men had confidence in the leadership of their commander. (e) Study Sources I and J. Why do you think that Sources I and J differ about the Battle of the Somme? [7 marks] Sources I and J were both written by Lloyd George, Source I in 1916 and Source J in the 1930's. In Source I Lloyd George says "that the heartening news of the last few days has confirmed that the tide has now defiantly turned in our favour." We know that the British attack lifted the pressure on Verdun, this could have been what Lloyd George was referring to at the time. When Source J was written in the 30s Lloyd George knew the full extend of casualties and lives lost, and obviously wanted to distance himself from decisions made at the time of the war. He seems to be covering himself by saying that he expressed his doubts to General Haig. ...read more.


Source G is an extract from the German official history of the First World War. It shows us that despite the huge British lose of life; there was still a huge impact on the Germans. They to had suffered the loss of experienced officers and the German armies confidence had been knocked. Strategically this was a great consequence for the British. Source H does not support the view that Haig was uncaring and sacrifices the lives of his soldier for no good reason. It was written by a British general who fought in both world wars and describes Haig as a leader with courage and determination who never wavered from his purpose of breaking down the powers of resistance of the enemy. The writer clearly believes that the British army were inspired by Haig and that Germany's spirit of resistance was broken. Source I written at the time of the war is also congratulating Haig on his skill and plans and describes heartening news that the tide had turned in favour of the British. This source in no way shows Haig sacrificing the lives of his soldiers. Source J written in the 30s shows Lloyd George distancing himself from the decisions made at the time, but in no way describes Haig as an uncaring general who deliberately sacrificed his soldiers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Just like the previous claim, there is lots of evidence to back this up and to refute this. Firstly, I will discuss this evidence to refute this assertion. It is a fact that the men in service under Haig loathed him.

  2. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    Overall from the collection of two sources I believe there is fairly enough evidence for both for and against Keegan's statement however there are only two sources. From the sources that are left there are three sources that all oppose Keegan's statement.

  1. Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    men for no reason, as it claims he was just trying to win the war regardless of how many men died, and he knew he had "no chance of a breakthrough". We don't know how much knowledge the writer would have had on the battle, but the source is from

  2. General Haig

    It says that he thinks he was one of the greatest men in the twentieth century and not a callous, uncaring man when in fact he was a very humane man. He also says "When the old soldiers who fought in the war were alive, I never heard a word of criticism from them.

  1. "Haig was an uncaring generalwho sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good ...

    Our troops are in wonderful spirits and full of confidence." This proves that Haig was informed that they had a successful start to the battle and that his men were confident of victory. As we already know, this wasn't the case.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    As the source says 'there must therefore be added 27,936 making the grand total of those evacuated by this date 366,162' this signifies additional military achievement for the British. We cannot however take all the source remarks at face value.

  1. 'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    like the british nickname was the Tommies. George in this speech bubble is being sarcastic as he is saying a British style thrashing, but if you remember the British weren't doing very well in the war as they lost 57,000 men on the first day and that shows that they couldn't give a good thrashing.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    There are also two more main differences between the sources: * Timing * Different perspective The timing is different because, the German eyewitness source is the day of the Somme, and the novel extract is from the night before. However both refer to the 1st day of the battle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work