• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig Sourcework

Extracts from this document...


(a) Study Sources A and B. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? [7 marks] I think that Source A does not prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men. It just shows that he knows that you cannot fight a war without having casualties. You know that he knows this because he says "No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders, no training however good, on the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives." He knows that in this particular battle there will be heavy casualties. You can see this when he says "The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists." Haig's views on warfare were inline with what most people thought at the time. He believed that the country should expect men t loose their lives for Britain to win the war. Source B shows us that Haig was not receiving accurate information. He believed that the barbed wire had been cut, which was not true. ...read more.


Source B also shows that Haig was caring as he is talking about the men's spirit, this shows that he did care about the morale of troops. Source H backs this up and shows that the men had confidence in the leadership of their commander. (e) Study Sources I and J. Why do you think that Sources I and J differ about the Battle of the Somme? [7 marks] Sources I and J were both written by Lloyd George, Source I in 1916 and Source J in the 1930's. In Source I Lloyd George says "that the heartening news of the last few days has confirmed that the tide has now defiantly turned in our favour." We know that the British attack lifted the pressure on Verdun, this could have been what Lloyd George was referring to at the time. When Source J was written in the 30s Lloyd George knew the full extend of casualties and lives lost, and obviously wanted to distance himself from decisions made at the time of the war. He seems to be covering himself by saying that he expressed his doubts to General Haig. ...read more.


Source G is an extract from the German official history of the First World War. It shows us that despite the huge British lose of life; there was still a huge impact on the Germans. They to had suffered the loss of experienced officers and the German armies confidence had been knocked. Strategically this was a great consequence for the British. Source H does not support the view that Haig was uncaring and sacrifices the lives of his soldier for no good reason. It was written by a British general who fought in both world wars and describes Haig as a leader with courage and determination who never wavered from his purpose of breaking down the powers of resistance of the enemy. The writer clearly believes that the British army were inspired by Haig and that Germany's spirit of resistance was broken. Source I written at the time of the war is also congratulating Haig on his skill and plans and describes heartening news that the tide had turned in favour of the British. This source in no way shows Haig sacrificing the lives of his soldiers. Source J written in the 30s shows Lloyd George distancing himself from the decisions made at the time, but in no way describes Haig as an uncaring general who deliberately sacrificed his soldiers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Just like the previous claim, there is lots of evidence to back this up and to refute this. Firstly, I will discuss this evidence to refute this assertion. It is a fact that the men in service under Haig loathed him.

  2. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    This is supported by the fact that Haig had managed to create so many casualties and deaths just on the first day and then continued with the same tactics with the same disappointing results. Source G also opposes Kegan's statement it is an extract from War memories of David Lloyd George published after the war.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    "The 1st day of the Somme" by Martin Middlebrook. The only places that the British and French didn't have this result was at Montaubon and Mametz, where the French and the Surrey Regiment did break through, only to fall back due to the fact that the cavalry didn't come to push through.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Unfortunately, Haig seemed unable to make these adjustments. His plans were always painstaking, his timing was meticulous and was always critical to success, and he always relied on information gleaned from aerial observation and photography. However his plans did not compensate for unavoidable mistakes that always happen in the confusion of battle.

  1. General Haig doesn't care about his soldiers.

    did think that they would teach the Germans a lesson and that it would be easy and over by Christmas. What the man with the moustache says in reply is obviously making a joke saying, "You mean are we all going to get killed?

  2. "Haig was an uncaring generalwho sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good ...

    Our troops are in wonderful spirits and full of confidence." This proves that Haig was informed that they had a successful start to the battle and that his men were confident of victory. As we already know, this wasn't the case.

  1. General Haig

    The purpose of the programme and the extract was to show the attitudes of soldiers in the First World War towards their commanders in a comical way. This source is quite useful to a historian studying attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War because it

  2. "Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    Throughout the war his "persistence" was not a public favourite as he made many mistakes. On the other side of the coin though, what could he do? He had been told by supporting generals that his plans were "brilliant" and therefore why would he change them?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work