• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig - The main Allied attack on the Western Front during 1916 was the Battle of the Somme. Famous chiefly on account of the loss of 58,000 British troops

Extracts from this document...


Haig Coursework The main Allied attack on the Western Front during 1916 was the Battle of the Somme. Famous chiefly on account of the loss of 58,000 British troops (one third of them killed) on the first day of the battle, 1 July 1916. To this day it remains a one-day record. The attack was launched upon a 30 kilometre front, from north of the Somme river between Arras and Albert, and ran from 1 July until 18 November, at which point it was called off. The offensive was planned late in 1915 and was intended as a joint French-British attack. The French Commander in Chief, Joffre, conceived the idea as a battle to depreciate the German forces of reserves, although territorial gain was a secondary aim. The plan was agreed upon by the new British Commander in Chief, Sir Douglas Haig, although Haig would have preferred an offensive among the open ground of Flanders. Haig, who took up his appointment as Commander in Chief of the British Expeditionary Force on 19 December 1915, had been granted authorisation by the British government, led by Asquith, to conduct a major offensive in 1916. Source B5ii, Part 2; Douglas Haig This source supports Sir Douglas Haig, and we can tell this is true, primarily because it was written by Haig himself, but also from such parts of the source as "The work of our artillery was wholly admirable". ...read more.


between the 1 July and the 18 November. He also informs us that "During the same period, we captured 29 heavy guns, 96 field guns and field howitzers, 136 trench mortars and 514 machine-guns." Haig doesn't mention the losses that his army had suffered: since the 1st July, the British has suffered 420,000 casualties, and the French lost nearly 200,000. Allied forces gained some land but it reached only 12km at its deepest points. This source would be useful when identifying how many prisoners had been taken, and also for collecting statistics on how many weapons had been captured. Source B6v, Part 2, Erich Ludendorff (Hindenburg's main Military Advisor) In this source, Ludendorff admits his heavy losses when the Allied infantry got into the trenches and villages before the Germans "could crawl out from their shelters." We can tell that Ludendorff knows he was defeated in that particular attack when he says "A continuous yield of prisoners to the enemy was the result." This source is useful when showing that the Ludendorff accepted his losses and admitted them, unlike Haig who seemed to always speak of how successful he was and made excuses for his losses ("The nation must be taught to bear losses"). ...read more.


This enables us to imagine how 58,000 men died on the first day of the Battle of the Somme. This source would be very useful when criticising Haig for sending so many men over the top. I think the source is reliable as it is written by a soldier who was fighting at the Somme. Source B8i, Part 2, William Robertson (from a letter to Haig, 1916) This source shows Robertson explaining to Haig that, firstly, casualties are unnecessarily high with no great gains, and secondly that "It is thought that the primary object - the relief of Verdun - has to some extent been achieved." Robertson informs Haig that the actual point of the attack (taking the pressure off of Verdun) had been achieved, and also that the Ministers are bothered about the fact that the casualty bill was somewhere between 200,000 and 300,000, and the allied forces hadn't made any great gains. This source could be useful when showing that the Ministers and others of higher-importance than Haig knew that there were lives being casually and unnecessarily wasted. I think this source is extremely valid and reliable as there are a lot of facts within the source. By Ross Saunders ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    This shifted however, by around 1917, when the allies gained the support of both Italy and America. We also saw that Haig and his staff began to realise what tactics needed to be altered, and utilised this to great effect.

  2. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    likely to exaggerate and I don't think is to be taken seriously. I would say that the source is unreliable, but does suggest that Haig is an uncaring general and reflects the basic feelings about the battle. Source E is from a cartoon from a British magazine published in February 1917.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    Before that soldiers would use various methods of collecting water. As soldiers were expected to rely on their water bottle that was only refilled when they went back to the reserve-line, soldiers found that they had a lack of water.

  2. Why was fighting on the Western Front such a new and terrible experience for ...

    This did not require any shooting or attack against the enemy but was almost as lethal as the Front line- It left soldiers out in the open and targeted them for long range guns keeping watch. Although approaching 'No Man's Land' proved to be near suicide many men also died

  1. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    This could be seen as a failure, once again due to ignorance, or an error due to age. Despite the death toll, Haig did in fact manage to achieve his aim of wearing the Germans down, i.e. attrition. The persistent tactics that he used did eventually take its toll on the opposition.

  2. 'Lions led by donkeys.' How valid is this interpretation of the leadership of Douglas ...

    Many, such as historian Alan Clark, feel he reached his high position through luck and good fortune. He claims that "He failed the Staff College examination." Which shows that Haig somehow managed to avoid formalities such as passing. In his second application "the formality of an entrance examination were waived".

  1. "Lions led by donkeys". How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    Also the source was produced in 1917, after the Battle of the Somme, when the views of generals had become critical due to little progress and news of high casualties. Another reason why the source might be over critical is that Liberals who often criticised the war effort were the main readers of Punch.

  2. How Far was Haig responsible for the failings of the British War effort on ...

    he thought all the Germans were dead which is a stupid way of thinking, this just made them very vulnerable to German attacks. The men were also carrying very heavy packs, containing trench repair kits, so when the British easily took the first line of trenches they could be repaired

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work