• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason. How far do these sources support this view?"

Extracts from this document...


William Martin Assignment 2 Q: 6 "Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason. How far do these sources support this view?" In the Question all the sources will be or relevance, some will support Haig and some will not. This is a summary of the sources that support the question. Source A was written a month before the attack and it is preparing the nation for the heavy losses and casualties that they will have to suffer. Winning is the main objective and it doesn't matter about the lives of his men. The whole source has a cold tone to it. In the second part of source B it claims that the battle is going well but it was only the first day and far to early to be drawing conclusions from it. From background knowledge we know that actually going badly but he still sent in more men to be killed. ...read more.


This is analogy of how Haig will do anything just to gain a few miles of land, even kill thousands of men. Source E is about a British cartoon drawn in 1917 after the Somme offensive had finished. It is stating the fact that Haig never went to the front line to see what the men where actually having to fight in. "Major-General: I want you to understand that there is a difference between a rehearsal and the real thing. There are three essential differences: first, the absence of the enemy. Now (turning to the Regimental Sergeant-Major) what is the second difference? Sergeant Major: The absence of the General, Sir." Source F is in favour of the question but we don't know when it was written or who wrote it. The title of the book, "British Butchers and Bunglers of World" gives the impression of negativity, very anti-war, anti Haig and the battle of the Somme. ...read more.


Also it is understandable that this man is so supportive of Haig. This general had lived his whole life in the army and had been taught to have complete faith in his commanders. Source I was written by David Lloyd George. It is very positive and supportive of Haig but at this point of David's life he was sectary of war. This meant that if the war was going badly he could be blamed. This source is also to keep moral high. The sources that support the stalemate out weight the sources that are against it. From background knowledge we know that Haig never visited the front line and was prepared to send men to there deaths in there thousands. He would send men over the top knowing that there were no gaps in the German wire. He would also send cavalry against machine guns, which was hopeless. The artillery was not set up properly and there was no element of surprise. The Germans would have always known about an attack. Also Haig was a very stubborn man. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The resultant of the battle of Verdun was a draw, with the same number or casualties and no ground lost or gained. However, if the Germans had had a lot more of their most experienced soldiers that were lost at the Somme, then Verdun would have been captured.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    and thought that wave and after wave of men could not be eliminated by machine guns. "The machine gun is a much overrated weapon," "The way to capture machine guns is by grit and determination." Comments made by Haig prior to the attack.

  1. Study all Sources - 'Haig was an uncaring General who sacrificed the lives of ...

    the Somme reduced pressure on the French: "The French pressed the British strongly to attack on the Somme by the end of the month and help relieve the pressure at Verdun."(users.tibus.com/the-great-war/sommewww) so in a way Haig helped the French from losing a battle which could have resulted in losing the war, by having the battle of Somme.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    However, the evidence seems to contradict this. Even after the poor display by the tank during it's first battle in the Somme, Haig ordered several one thousand more tanks to be built. Although this might not have been a great military decision, it certainly seems to dispel the notion that he was unwilling to accept them.

  1. "Haig was an uncaring generalwho sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good ...

    "Several have said that they have never before been so instructed and informed of the nature of the operation before them." This sentence tells us what some of the commanding officers have told him. We must remember that the commanding officers weren't in the trenches and could be saying good things just to get in Haig's good books.

  2. "Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    He believes that "any Tommy" could have told Haig that his tactics are useless. And therefore it shows Haig as being a poor general. The problem is Haig genuinely believed that his plans were safe, and he was wrong another sign of ignorance.

  1. 'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    then replies with, "Great Scott, Sir! You mean the moment has finally arrived for us to give Harry Hun a darn good British style thrashing, six of the best trousers down?" Harry Hun is a nickname that the British gave the German soldiers (the Huns) like the british nickname was the Tommies.

  2. How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    In conclusion I believe that Source C is probably more trustworthy than Source B because George Coppard was telling us his account years after the war and was not under government pressure to say certain things. Haig needed to produce good news for the public and I don't believe that we can completely trust the information that is given.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work