• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

history coursework question 4 blitz

Extracts from this document...


4) Study Sources E, F and G. Use Sources E, F and G, and your own knowledge, to explain why the government was concerned about the morale of the British people in the autumn of 1940. (12) The height of the Blitz started around the autumn of 1940, during this time the British government was trying to keep the morale in Britain extremely high in order to achieve and avoid situations but did the government do enough to keep the spirit of Britain strong? By June 1940, Hitler had managed to capture 7 countries there was a growing fear in the government that Britain would be next. Hitler's aim of the Blitz was to break the morale of Britain therefore it is understandable why the government highly used censorship and propaganda to keep the morale high. ...read more.


Source E shows how many people seemed to be "hysterical" and in panic, they would "run madly for shelters". It's their own secret report which was done by the Ministry of Information and it clearly shows how seriously they took the problem. The government wanted to avoid "shelter mentality" from taking place and tried to keep morale high in order to avoid that situation. But what exactly did the government do in order to stop morale from dropping low? A large part of the way the government tried to stop morale from being low was through censoring images and through the use of propaganda. Any image which showed bombs, dead bodies or a negative part of the Blitz would have been banned; the government also made sure certain pieces of news were not broadcasted. ...read more.


In Source G we can see that although trekking took place, most people came back the next day for work. Even if the morale was low, people still believed they had to turn up to work and during the Blitz the industrial production continued with good attendance from the workers. The Source was written in 1988 therefore it is written with a good historical overview. Source G proves how the government had successfully managed to sustain the morale and avoid lack of workers in factories, which the government believed to be a real problem. In conclusion, the government was concerned about British morale as if it was low then that would mean many disastrous things would take place like "shelter mentality" and letting Hitler achieve his aim. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The student's response to the question is explicit but there is a lack of developing the ideas and examples made (which in turn, creates the idea of asserting points). Whilst assertion of points is not heavily criticised at GCSE level, ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student's response to the question is explicit but there is a lack of developing the ideas and examples made (which in turn, creates the idea of asserting points). Whilst assertion of points is not heavily criticised at GCSE level, it helps the structure and clarity of the essay if assertions are avoided by fully developing the idea supported with examples. The introduction and conclusion show a clear understanding of the question set and the student meets the requirements of addressing all three sources mentioned however the 'own knowledge' does not seem overly apparent in the essay. This said, I don't know what the sources were and can only guess that the majority of what is said in the essay is inferred from the source and not further developed in some cases. There were some very vague ideas such as "many disastrous things" 'floating' around in the essay which is also best avoided as it shows the lack of confidence in the argument along with the lack of 'own knowledge'. In regards to lack of developing ideas, the censorship from the government is best explained by the fact that the death toll was steadily climbing along with the frustration from the public towards war. Thus this brings in 'own knowledge' along with developing the ideas from the source further.

Level of analysis

The ideas that the student did develop in this essay were very good. The essay does not lack source analysis and evaluation but that extra step of bringing in 'own knowledge' would have gained the student the top marks. However, it was clear from the introduction the line of argument that the student was to take and it was very strongly sustained throughout the essay. This said, perhaps it was because everything was said in the introduction that the conclusion did not seem to do very much for the essay apart from telling the examiner the essay was complete. It is always best to try and keep the introduction and conclusion of a balanced length. Also, the student should avoid asking questions within the essay and stating the obvious from the question set. It is obvious that the essay should address the question and perhaps suggest a main reason / cause - this does not need to be repeated in coursework as it just eats up the precious word count.

Quality of writing

The spelling, grammar and punctuation had a few questionable places. Though nothing major, one should make sure that they always check through their work as such 'silly mistakes' do not leave a good impression to the examiner and spoils a high standard essay. The technical terms used in the essay were appropriate and the student follows typical conventions in regards to the structure of the essay. On the other hand, I should note that it is not necessary to write the word Source every time. It is ok to write 'E is an account ....' rather than 'Source E is an account'. This again helps the word count.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by crystalclearmagic 24/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    means his interpretation is non basis and clearly explained and back up with evidence. Richard Gotts had reached his interpretation that the British Empire was not only negative towards the colonies but to the British as well. Richard Gotts had reached this interpretation, as modern historians in wanting to find

  2. Year 10 Essay: How successful was the League of Nations between 1919 and 1929?

    The industrial area went to Germany, and the rural area stayed to Poland. The League safeguarded rail links between the two countries, and made arrangements for water and power supplies from one side of the border to be supplied to the other.

  1. How did the Blitz affect the British people?

    The three sisters seem to continue as normal. The girls explain they were happy as they could stay out longer and later, so despite the war, people were determined to continue to have fun. However despite this positive effect, sometimes the bombing raids still had an impact as the sisters

  2. Haig Coursework

    The final difference is found in source 3. The writer appears to be 'very bitter', with comments including, 'made earl... I know what I'd...' Even though they express the same view of Haig as source 2, calling him a 'butcher' (source 2)

  1. World War 1-Life in the Trenches

    These things were well known amongst soldiers, and often made them feel low as it was so easy to die, not forgetting they could have been attacked by the enemy. The idea that people who represent the country live with rats made the soldiers feel as if it is not worth it.

  2. The Blitz - questions and answers

    The British survived the blitz but with terrible effect, high numbers of casualties threatened morale. It had been said that despite the Blitz threat to morale, the Blitz actually brought people together. Struggling to cope with the bombings and disruptions to their everyday lives people actually stayed determined not to

  1. Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

    The disaster is that they have lost an awful lot. They have been betrayed and they have been through a lot of emotional torment seeing their friends and allies fall victim to enemy gunfire. They have achieved a lot getting back to British shores, but the axis are still winning the war.

  2. GCSE History The Blitz C/W

    All of these points contribute to why the major cities of Britain were bombed by the Germans the biggest one being to try and destroy the British industry. 2. Describe the effects of the Blitz on everyday life in Britain?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work