• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

history coursework question 4 blitz

Extracts from this document...


4) Study Sources E, F and G. Use Sources E, F and G, and your own knowledge, to explain why the government was concerned about the morale of the British people in the autumn of 1940. (12) The height of the Blitz started around the autumn of 1940, during this time the British government was trying to keep the morale in Britain extremely high in order to achieve and avoid situations but did the government do enough to keep the spirit of Britain strong? By June 1940, Hitler had managed to capture 7 countries there was a growing fear in the government that Britain would be next. Hitler's aim of the Blitz was to break the morale of Britain therefore it is understandable why the government highly used censorship and propaganda to keep the morale high. ...read more.


Source E shows how many people seemed to be "hysterical" and in panic, they would "run madly for shelters". It's their own secret report which was done by the Ministry of Information and it clearly shows how seriously they took the problem. The government wanted to avoid "shelter mentality" from taking place and tried to keep morale high in order to avoid that situation. But what exactly did the government do in order to stop morale from dropping low? A large part of the way the government tried to stop morale from being low was through censoring images and through the use of propaganda. Any image which showed bombs, dead bodies or a negative part of the Blitz would have been banned; the government also made sure certain pieces of news were not broadcasted. ...read more.


In Source G we can see that although trekking took place, most people came back the next day for work. Even if the morale was low, people still believed they had to turn up to work and during the Blitz the industrial production continued with good attendance from the workers. The Source was written in 1988 therefore it is written with a good historical overview. Source G proves how the government had successfully managed to sustain the morale and avoid lack of workers in factories, which the government believed to be a real problem. In conclusion, the government was concerned about British morale as if it was low then that would mean many disastrous things would take place like "shelter mentality" and letting Hitler achieve his aim. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The student's response to the question is explicit but there is a lack of developing the ideas and examples made (which in turn, creates the idea of asserting points). Whilst assertion of points is not heavily criticised at GCSE level, ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student's response to the question is explicit but there is a lack of developing the ideas and examples made (which in turn, creates the idea of asserting points). Whilst assertion of points is not heavily criticised at GCSE level, it helps the structure and clarity of the essay if assertions are avoided by fully developing the idea supported with examples. The introduction and conclusion show a clear understanding of the question set and the student meets the requirements of addressing all three sources mentioned however the 'own knowledge' does not seem overly apparent in the essay. This said, I don't know what the sources were and can only guess that the majority of what is said in the essay is inferred from the source and not further developed in some cases. There were some very vague ideas such as "many disastrous things" 'floating' around in the essay which is also best avoided as it shows the lack of confidence in the argument along with the lack of 'own knowledge'. In regards to lack of developing ideas, the censorship from the government is best explained by the fact that the death toll was steadily climbing along with the frustration from the public towards war. Thus this brings in 'own knowledge' along with developing the ideas from the source further.

Level of analysis

The ideas that the student did develop in this essay were very good. The essay does not lack source analysis and evaluation but that extra step of bringing in 'own knowledge' would have gained the student the top marks. However, it was clear from the introduction the line of argument that the student was to take and it was very strongly sustained throughout the essay. This said, perhaps it was because everything was said in the introduction that the conclusion did not seem to do very much for the essay apart from telling the examiner the essay was complete. It is always best to try and keep the introduction and conclusion of a balanced length. Also, the student should avoid asking questions within the essay and stating the obvious from the question set. It is obvious that the essay should address the question and perhaps suggest a main reason / cause - this does not need to be repeated in coursework as it just eats up the precious word count.

Quality of writing

The spelling, grammar and punctuation had a few questionable places. Though nothing major, one should make sure that they always check through their work as such 'silly mistakes' do not leave a good impression to the examiner and spoils a high standard essay. The technical terms used in the essay were appropriate and the student follows typical conventions in regards to the structure of the essay. On the other hand, I should note that it is not necessary to write the word Source every time. It is ok to write 'E is an account ....' rather than 'Source E is an account'. This again helps the word count.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by crystalclearmagic 24/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    The empire also taxed the colonies heavily decrease there income and their countries GDP rates. There is a lot of evidence to support the view that the British Empire had negative effects on Britain for example because the empire wasn't ruling the colonies as they would have this caused Britain

  2. Peer reviewed

    history coursework question 5 the blitz

    4 star(s)

    The government was so worried about morale becoming low as there was a possibility of "shelter mentality" developing among the working class and also Hitler's main aim of the Blitz was to break British morale therefore through censorship and propaganda, the government could control what was shown through the media and therefore keep morale high.

  1. World War 1-Life in the Trenches

    die so people will lead better lives in the future is glorious. But at the time of the war this wouldn't have been recognised, you can only see the difference many years later, when the war had completely finished. Back then it would have been just another person.


    Charles soon started to argue with it. Parliament insisted on discussing its grievances (the things it did not like about the way Charles had run the country) before voting money for the war. After receiving the money he shut it down again after almost a month after he had recalled it after eleven years.

  1. How democratic had Britain become by 1928.

    Allegations of illegal acts during elections did decline significantly after this Act was passed and average election expenditure of candidates also fell significantly. Although corruption declined it did not completely die out. The 1867 Reform Act gave the vote to about 1,500,000 men.

  2. Evacuation during WWII - source based questions.

    This is implying that the foster - parents are doing a great fob in caring for evacuees, but there is need for more foster - parents. The advertisement is very encouraging; giving valid reasons as to why caring for an evacuee is good for the carer, the evacuee and the actual parents.

  1. Sourcework - The impression that the British faced the Blitz with courage and unity ...

    However the Nazi propaganda minister described the Home Guard as a "mob of amateurs armed with broom-sticks" despite these comments I believe that the Home Guard was an effective force not so much because it was a strong army but because it helped boost morale and made people feel wanted.

  2. Was there really a 'Blitz Spirit'?

    Although there aren't many reasons as to why this could not be useful but Alice Bridges could've exaggerated the raids to seem better. But overall I think it might useful. Secondly a supposed Liverpool family's experience explains how they were left homeless for six months due to a heavy raid to the buildings whilst in the shelter.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work