• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

history coursework question 5 the blitz

Extracts from this document...


5. Study all the sources, and use your own knowledge. The impression that the British faced the Blitz with courage and unity is a myth. Use the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this statement. (14) I disagree to an extent with the statement that Britain faced the Blitz without courage and unity because Britain did remain generally strong and unified as Britain managed to survive the Blitz and continue working even after the Blitz. However, a large amount of the media shown during the Blitz was propaganda which raises a question about how did the public really feel during the Blitz and whether they actually felt unified. The statement can also be compared to Angus Calder's theory where he believed that the unification of Britain during the Blitz was a myth. During World War II, the government set up the Ministry of Information to firstly, censor all newspapers and radios and secondly, to produce propaganda to help 'boost public morale'. ...read more.


It is a very positive image and the people are seen to be having "blitz spirit", this purpose of the image would've been to help keep Britain unified during the Blitz. This image proves how the government influenced on what was shown; we don't actually know whether or not the people photographed felt positive or whether they had been asked to smile therefore it was a propaganda picture and because it was published, many people would've seen it. This would have influenced the way people felt about the Blitz as it would have left a positive impact on the reader. Source C also could suggest whether "Blitz Spirit" even exist due to the propaganda and therefore supports the statement. Another source which agrees with the statement is Source E. It shows how some people would run "madly" to the shelters and it was written in autumn 1940 which was during the height of the Blitz. ...read more.


However, we know that most people came back the next day for work which shows how the Blitz did not affect the industry as people still believed they had to turn up for work, there was still good attendance and production during the Blitz. Source G was written in 1988 which shows there was a good historical overview and also talks about "trekking", it proves to us how the government managed to successfully sustain the morale, even if it was at times low, and avoid lack of workers in the factories which the government believed to be a problem. The source therefore disagrees with the statement as Britain managed to continue the industrial production up. To conclude, I agree with Calder in the sense that our understanding of the Blitz is largely based on propaganda. However, I disagree with Calder and the statement as Britain managed to survive the Blitz and go on to rebuild the damage, also during the Blitz Britain managed to continue working in factories which proves there had to be some element of unification during the Blitz. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The student has a clear line of argument and argues their line well throughout the essay. However, the student has a very strong siding towards rejecting the title therefore the 'for argument' in the essay is relatively weak in comparison ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student has a clear line of argument and argues their line well throughout the essay. However, the student has a very strong siding towards rejecting the title therefore the 'for argument' in the essay is relatively weak in comparison to the 'against argument'. By this, I mean that the 'for' is less well developed in terms of supporting it with evidence. Whilst this is not always possible to achieve, certainly for such source coursework, they always give sources which strongly agree, disagree and some which can be used on both sides. The structure is very clear and the introduction opens the essay well. However, the introduction seemed to also do the work of the conclusion as by the conclusion, there were no points left to say and so it was repeating almost exactly what had been said before. The idea of the conclusion is to wrap up the essay and tie up any loose ends - I felt this was all done throughout the essay therefore the conclusion seemed slightly pointless.

Level of analysis

The student shows a strong analytical approach to the sources and writes well. As mentioned above, the student lacks some depth in some areas where they could have been more specific and precise in detail bringing in their 'own knowledge'. The sources were closely looked at and the student obviously has a very good understanding of each source in relation to the question. The student uses the sources to their advantage and uses it to guide the essay which is good, but this also endangers the 'own knowledge' part as it can be too heavily source based (which this was tending towards). The conclusion was a strong and apparent one from the start. However, I would avoid the words "I" and "we" in an essay. Especially with the word "I" as it is always obvious that the essay is your opinion so ultimately whatever your conclusion, it is always your argument. In regards to the word "we", it is not as professional to use. The student could try other phrasing such as 'It is evident from E that....' rather than 'We can see from E that...'.

Quality of writing

The spelling, grammar and punctuation had a few questionable places. Though nothing major, one should make sure that they always check through their work as such 'silly mistakes' do not leave a good impression to the examiner and spoils a high standard essay. The technical terms used in the essay were appropriate and the student follows typical conventions in regards to the structure of the essay. The student has also mentioned each source at least once which is good as marks can be deducted if this is omitted. I should add that it is not necessary to write the word Source every time. It is ok to write 'E is an account ....' rather than 'Source E is an account'. This again helps the word count.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by crystalclearmagic 24/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    Cecil Rhode was an English businessmen that wanted to see the empire grow as it would bring in him fortune, due to the empire Cecil Rhode business in diamond mining became increasingly successful, so successful that the empire named a country after him, Rhodesia ( Zimbabwe)

  2. To what extent was appeasement justified?

    This was vital as it had to provide a global defense for all of Britain's territories. Britain desperately needed more time for rearmament. Furthermore, Germany was obviously more prepared, and this was seen in the bombing of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War.

  1. Why was the Edwardian times a 'golden age'?

    He identified primary and secondary poverty, very poor families, and families that earned just about enough to live, with no money to spare for ill health, unemployment or old age. He also claimed that �1 a week should be enough to keep a family 'just above the poverty line' if no money was spent on medication, newspapers, fares etc.

  2. Haig Coursework

    and a 'murderer' (source 3), it shows signs of acrimony towards Haig, when he says 'I'm very bitter, always will be' and 'I don't think he knew what a trench was like'. This is a considerable bias, and would greatly affect his judgement, unlike sources 1 and 2 which show comparatively few signs of bias on a personal level.

  1. World War 1-Life in the Trenches

    were special and worthy to be part of the country if you were in the army. Also soldiers in the army who wrote back to their family would write good things so their family wouldn't be upset about them being there.

  2. Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

    They have been cruelly betrayed but never defeated or dispirited, which is one of the biggest weapons of winning the war. They are still fighting with honor and dignity, all in formation, still with their rifles. This is a reassurance to all the British back in their homes.

  1. The Blitz - questions and answers

    Normal life was overturned as an effect of the Blitz and so British people found different ways to avoid the bombs. Blackouts were introduced to avoid the Blitz and affected the British people at night because they had to be very considerate and turn the lights off so Germans wouldn't know where to bomb as ARP wardens made Blackouts compulsory.

  2. Evacuation in Britain during World War II

    I think the aim of the book was to tell people that evacuation from his experience was a good thing which is the complete opposite to what source 7 told us. This source creates a huge contrast with source 7 because in source 7 evacuation is shown as a bad experience but in source 10 it is a great thing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work