• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Sourcework - How Far does Source I prove that Goering was telling the truth in Source H? - Hitler's Germany

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Sourcework: Study Sources H and I. How Far does Source I prove that Goering was telling the truth in Source H? Source H was written by Goering who was at the time in command of the German economy. Goering was a high ranking party official, achieving the prestige of being Hitler's deputy at one point. He was furious that Goebbels had allowed so much destruction during the ransacking of Jewish Property. He was stringently trying to adhere to the 4-year economic plan that was to prepare Germany for war. He saw that the property and goods within the Jewish households which would have greatly useful to help achieve this plan. He had nothing to do directly with Kristallnact though. After the damage of Kristallnact in order to keep in line with the party's Anti Semitic policies he charged the Jew's 100 million marks for the damage caused that night. He was later charged with the responsibility of the Jews in the concentration camps, which led to him being tried after the war, in that trial this account was given. The testimony follows the opinions of Goering in that his fierce competition against Goebbels that results in placing all of the blame onto Goebbels shoulders who was not there to defend himself, after committing suicide. ...read more.

Middle

However the claim that Hitler apologising for the actions of Goebbels, we do not know. If Source A is anything to be going by, it seems that Hitler fully supported the actions of Goebbels. The reason why he would apologise for the actions of Goebbels if Source A were true is unknown, unless he was putting a face on to all other senior Nazi's. There are a few gaps in the text. Goering's interpretation of what happened during Kristallnact is unknown and what he was doing at the time. He did not disclose in the piece who else apart from Goebbels was responsible for Kristallnact. Nor Fritz Hesse reported if what happened at the dinner party in a true manner as he was probably there. However we do know that Goering was not directly involved in Kristallnact though he had to deal with the consequences. Source I is a reporting of a conversation held with Hitler by Frau Troost, a women married to Hitler's favourite architect. The speaker in this source is Hitler, occurring shortly after Kristallnact. The opinion of Hitler seems to be that Kristallnact was a regrettable event because of von Roth's death and maybe because everybody saw the Jews killed on the street, which he did not want to occur. The consequences were starting to emerge on the economy as well throwing the four-year economic plan askew. ...read more.

Conclusion

The agreement with France is not put into more detail. What was it? Was their really any sort of plan with France? It may have been a Nazi bluff. No other source agrees or mentions with this aspect of the conversation, which leaves it as a bit suspect. The figure of speech '' Elephant in a china shop'' does agree with Sources C, E, F and G in picturing Kristallnact as a brutal messy attack. In conclusion Source I does agree to an extent that Goering was telling the truth in source H. It agrees on the fact that there was extensive damage to German Property and eventually the Economy. The tone Hitler uses in Source I suggests that he did regret the incident and meaning that he may have apologised for Goebbels, therefore agreeing with Source H again. Further similarities result from Adolf Hitler claiming that the entire occurrence of Kristallnact shouldn't have happened. Whether or not Hitler feels that the economy was damaged and the four-year plan in the process, is not discussed in Source I so remains unknown. However the use of the plural form of ''the people responsible'' indicates that there was more than one person responsible for organising the riots. Source H just shows Goering blaming Goebbels for everything. This results in the two sources agreeing on most issues to an extent, meaning that both ounces carry a reasonable degree of reliability as they confer reasonably. J.Harratt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    It is like a warning to not follow them. The book is trying to convince the readers that van der Lubbe was the one who set the fire. This is why the Nazi author put him on the cover along with the fire.

  2. adolf hitler

    Threatening and beseeching, with small pleading hands and flaming steel-blue eyes, he had the look of a fanatic. Presently my critical faculty was swept away he was holding the masses, and me with them, under a hypnotic spell by the sheer force of his conviction.

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    The fact that lions eat sheep further indicates his intention of taking hold of the countries/colonies. A reason for the league not to be worried, however, is that Italy showed its weakness in 1920 when it came running to the league after the incident at Corfu.

  2. Nazi Sourcework

    Source B however states that women lost all their benefits and right under Nazi rule and that they gained nothing in exchange. (c) Sources D and E are useful as evidence about Nazis policy towards women because they both imply that women should have children for their hard working men.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Van Der Lubbe would be under a greater deal of pressure which may have affected the content of his statement, and therefore adding bias and unreliability to the comparison between each. In conclusion, there is inconclusive evidence to say whether source A is fully supported by source B.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    When there was an emergency in Rome, the emperor and his leading followers had dictatorial powers, much as Hitler did in Germany. If the togas are a reference to that, then this point is neither for nor against the Nazis.

  1. Nazi Germany 1933-45 Source Work

    At no moment of my struggle on behalf of the German people have I forgotten the duty incumbent on me to uphold European cultures and European civilisation. The German people have no interest in seeing the French people suffer. Why should it not be possible to lift the problem of

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    other hand it could be reliable because he uses negative Nazi images and he also he has taken an enormous risk in writing this note. Source 'E' attempts to convey shock of "Most German people", who are not he says involved in the "plunderings and destruction" of Jewish property.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work