• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Sourcework - How Far does Source I prove that Goering was telling the truth in Source H? - Hitler's Germany

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Sourcework: Study Sources H and I. How Far does Source I prove that Goering was telling the truth in Source H? Source H was written by Goering who was at the time in command of the German economy. Goering was a high ranking party official, achieving the prestige of being Hitler's deputy at one point. He was furious that Goebbels had allowed so much destruction during the ransacking of Jewish Property. He was stringently trying to adhere to the 4-year economic plan that was to prepare Germany for war. He saw that the property and goods within the Jewish households which would have greatly useful to help achieve this plan. He had nothing to do directly with Kristallnact though. After the damage of Kristallnact in order to keep in line with the party's Anti Semitic policies he charged the Jew's 100 million marks for the damage caused that night. He was later charged with the responsibility of the Jews in the concentration camps, which led to him being tried after the war, in that trial this account was given. The testimony follows the opinions of Goering in that his fierce competition against Goebbels that results in placing all of the blame onto Goebbels shoulders who was not there to defend himself, after committing suicide. ...read more.

Middle

However the claim that Hitler apologising for the actions of Goebbels, we do not know. If Source A is anything to be going by, it seems that Hitler fully supported the actions of Goebbels. The reason why he would apologise for the actions of Goebbels if Source A were true is unknown, unless he was putting a face on to all other senior Nazi's. There are a few gaps in the text. Goering's interpretation of what happened during Kristallnact is unknown and what he was doing at the time. He did not disclose in the piece who else apart from Goebbels was responsible for Kristallnact. Nor Fritz Hesse reported if what happened at the dinner party in a true manner as he was probably there. However we do know that Goering was not directly involved in Kristallnact though he had to deal with the consequences. Source I is a reporting of a conversation held with Hitler by Frau Troost, a women married to Hitler's favourite architect. The speaker in this source is Hitler, occurring shortly after Kristallnact. The opinion of Hitler seems to be that Kristallnact was a regrettable event because of von Roth's death and maybe because everybody saw the Jews killed on the street, which he did not want to occur. The consequences were starting to emerge on the economy as well throwing the four-year economic plan askew. ...read more.

Conclusion

The agreement with France is not put into more detail. What was it? Was their really any sort of plan with France? It may have been a Nazi bluff. No other source agrees or mentions with this aspect of the conversation, which leaves it as a bit suspect. The figure of speech '' Elephant in a china shop'' does agree with Sources C, E, F and G in picturing Kristallnact as a brutal messy attack. In conclusion Source I does agree to an extent that Goering was telling the truth in source H. It agrees on the fact that there was extensive damage to German Property and eventually the Economy. The tone Hitler uses in Source I suggests that he did regret the incident and meaning that he may have apologised for Goebbels, therefore agreeing with Source H again. Further similarities result from Adolf Hitler claiming that the entire occurrence of Kristallnact shouldn't have happened. Whether or not Hitler feels that the economy was damaged and the four-year plan in the process, is not discussed in Source I so remains unknown. However the use of the plural form of ''the people responsible'' indicates that there was more than one person responsible for organising the riots. Source H just shows Goering blaming Goebbels for everything. This results in the two sources agreeing on most issues to an extent, meaning that both ounces carry a reasonable degree of reliability as they confer reasonably. J.Harratt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. adolf hitler

    Then all of a sudden he would jump up, and running about excitedly, make a speech attacking the Jews. (3) Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (1925) On the 13th October, 1918, I was caught in a heavy British gas attack at Ypres.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Usually people would just believe a primary statement like this. But, because the Nazis are famous for torturing, we could not say whether this statement is true or not.

  1. History Sourcework - Do Sources D and E make it more or less likely, ...

    If he is referring to the 10th of November there is no account for the 9th and the build up of the Anti-Semitic laws within Germany. He does not say how the SS and SA received there housebreaking tools or who gave them the tools and their orders; this leads

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    Despite the fact that source B shows how the league was slow and how Italy were about to leave, I still think that what the dogs and the woman show are more crucial in terms of understanding the problems. The fact that the conflict is shown and how Britain, France

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Communist, and as the Communists were one of his main rivals in the elections he could use the fire as propaganda for the Nazis in proving that the Communists were no good. The togas that the two men are wearing in this image could be taken to mean different things.

  2. Nazi Sourcework

    Source D is a propaganda poster showing a woman holding and looking down on lovingly her child while the men are working hard in the fields. Source D shows that the Nazis expected women to nurse their children while their German men were working hard in the fields or protecting them.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Van Der Lubbe would be under a greater deal of pressure which may have affected the content of his statement, and therefore adding bias and unreliability to the comparison between each. In conclusion, there is inconclusive evidence to say whether source A is fully supported by source B.

  2. Nazi Germany 1933-45 Source Work

    Hitler from a speech to Reich Governors, July 1933 Source C: Hitler reassures France after remilitarising the Rhineland. You know how hard was the road that I have had to travel since 30 January 1933 in order to free the German people from the dishonourable position in which it found itself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work