• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

how are suffragists and suffragettes different?

Extracts from this document...


How were the Suffragists and Suffragettes' methods different? The Suffragists was a campaign to give women the right to vote and also to give women justice. It was founded and led by Millicent Fawcett in 1897. The Suffragettes was also a campaign and organisation to give women the right to vote, however this organisation started later and was inspired by the Suffragists. The Suffragettes was started and led by Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst in 1889. The main difference between the two was the methods used to get their points across. The Suffragists took a more calmer and rational approach to the situation however the Suffragettes chose to use militant methods to make people agree with them. The Suffragists used peaceful methods which would take its toll upon the decisions of the voting in a long period of time. Some of the methods used by the Suffragists were petitions, debates, speeches and posters. ...read more.


The reason why they used posters was because a lot of people would see the posters and that might persuade or even just give information on the campaign. The Suffragettes used rebellious and aggressive methods, so their beliefs straight away were different to the Suffragists. The Suffragettes believed in 'deeds not words', they believed that women should demand the vote not ask for it. Some of their methods were heckling, debating, hunger strikes, embarrassment, and other violent immoral methods. All the methods had several reasons behind them, their beliefs. The Suffragettes used heckling as a method because they thought if they keep irritating the politicians they are going to have to give in sooner or later. They also used debating as a method because again just to get their point across to the country. Suffragettes had a very good reason for using hunger as a method that was to make people feel sympathetic towards them, so people would think they feel so deeply about the issues that they would starve to death for it to become true. ...read more.


They have no respect from the men and the politicians were men so they are not going to take onboard their ideas. However Suffragists taking a calm approach showed men that women aren't dense they also have a mind that they like to express but in a peaceful manner. So they must have won respect over which means votes. There are many ways in which the two leaders' attitude to the wole manner was different. Both of the leaders wanted women to have the right to vote, to do that they needed publicity this was where the differences showed through their attitudes. Millicent Fawcett got publicity by being civilised and making speeches, letters to politicians and many other various ways, they gained a lot of respect for women. However Emmeline Pankhurst resulted to violence, smashing windows and harassing politicians and for publicity going on hunger strikes. They both used completely different methods to get the same point of view and same change in the country across. Mohanjit Sekhon 10x1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. What were the main differences between the suffragettes and the suffragists?

    Suffragette violence caused many women to end up in prison, which became another publicity campaign. In 1912, a huge hunger strike began. As women were still portrayed as weak and vulnerable this was very much a sympathy vote.

  2. Free essay

    age and voting

    to collect reliable quantitative data on my particular research are and stuck to the positivist approach outlined in my methodology. This was because it allowed me to product data that was easy to interpret and analysis and come up with a solid conclusion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work